namelesstavern.net

Drem wrote:it must suck to go through life worrying about shit like this. i feel really sorry for you, harrison. maybe you should get mad at john hawkyns for subjugating an entire race of human beings

YOu should be mad at the africans themselves and the Dutch before John Hawkins.

Lueyen wrote:Key to the explanation and proof will be how he defines success.

likely, but ones personal definition isn't fact.

to say something as bold and arrogant as caucasians are more successful than anyone in the world while asking where's the ignorance, you should certainly have a statistical fact that backs it up, or the statement is exactly everything that encompasses ignorance.

Why even read what Mark says? He's an ignorant douchebag.

for pure interest and to point out the blatant disregard for facts in his crusade to prove white superiority, why else?!

Gypsiyee wrote:if you're counting the success of caucasians in australia, most european countries, and 2/3 of north america, well no kidding - that's a ton of countries that are comprised of a majority of whites. that's by no means 'most everywhere in the world' especially if you do just a little bit of research on the population percentages of those areas to other continents

i'm no demographic or census expert, but considering the success of an overwhelming number of asian populace, including the size of china alone, cite your source. factor in africa, south america, and the rest of asia, and i think you have a fantastic recipe for bullshit stew.

Bolded where it starting to get "lol" level of funny.

Red text to reference points in the following maps: (going to post a few to minimize inconsistencies)







This next one is about the percentage that are malnourished in its populace and not economic prosperity and/or freedom.(I think we can safely say that a well-fed populace is "successful" in the broadest of terms)



Let's look at Africa in specific:



I don't know about you, but you don't exactly have statistics backing your end up either.

P.S. I'm not on Mark's side on a global scale. Societal differences are ridiculously too vast. I'm merely providing a bit of information in the form of maps. (Most of them are labeled, and when they are not, the meaning is easily discerned by cross referencing to the U.S., Australia and Japan which are all equals on each map excluding the one of Africa.)

I am not going to go fucking digging for any up-to-date statistics to coincide with aforementioned maps. You guys can waste that amount of time if you so wish.

Too bad you can't zoom into the map to see the shithole you live in. It would probably be its own colour.

Oh, I'd gladly dig those up if they were more readily available.

Get a fucking job, you bum.

I'll stop being a bum the same time you stop raging against the machine long after everyone else grew up.

you just get more fucking retarded by the day

just to help your lack of reading ability, i was factoring in the rest of the world minus antarctica. what i referenced was *every other continent with a population of working life* but LOL HEY GUYS THERES POVERTY IN SOME PARTS OF THE WORLD!! no shit you stupid ass, that DOES NOT change the success rate of working class people, or the amount there are in comparison to your delusions of white power.

your google image search provided no insight, as it never does. there are no numbers of rate of success, it's a poverty map on a world scale in certain areas of the world that are nowhere near the civilization of those that i was talking about. note that i specifically said that i'm no expert on demographics and to provide statistical proof.. yet again, you have failed to deliver anything but something that's not pertinent to the topic at hand in any way shape or form

you are, and will forever be, an ignorant hopeless piece of shit white trash lazy ass douchebag with nothing to validate himself but an unwarranted superiority complex

learn a little reading comprehension you uneducated neo-nazi looking slob. the most amusing part is how you link pretty pictures it in an argument to prove the success of white people where you're the epitome of failure.

ITT: rage**** rages more

When you go to post in a moderated forum kindly remove that word from your vocabulary - Lueyen

your lack of wit never disappoints

Gypsiyee wrote:you are, and will forever be, an ignorant hopeless piece of shit white trash lazy ass douchebag with nothing to validate himself but an unwarranted superiority complex

learn a little reading comprehension you uneducated neo-nazi looking slob. the most amusing part is how you link pretty pictures it in an argument to prove the success of white people where you're the epitome of failure.

Not to defend Finawin, but he doesn't at all look like a neo-nazi to me. I'd say he acts and looks more like a redneck KKK fuck.

I love how 2 white guys are boasting white success while their personal situations go against the statistic they present.

Here's a stat for you. 93.4% of US citizens are employed (Seattle Post Intelligencer). Congrats Harrison, you are Mr. 6.6%. Out of everyone in the US that's unemployed, 1.7% of them are caucasian. Congrats at being specialer. Oh, the national high school drop out rate is 10%. Out of that total, less than 3% of them are white.

I guess the conclusion to all of this is that Harrison has a better chance of winning the lottery than being at least a semi successful contribution to society. Only difference between him and his dad is marijuana. At least dad has an excuse.

Jay wrote:I guess the conclusion to all of this is that Harrison has a better chance of winning the lottery than being at least a semi successful contribution to society.

absolutely owned, haha

My statement is based on a per-capita generaization. Per-capita, caucasions are more succesful than any other race almost everywhere in the world. Yes, here are very successful Chinese, Japanese, etc... but even in those countries caucasions are generally more succesful on a per-capita basis than other races. Are you saying that I'm wrong?

It has nothing to do with superiority. It's a defense against your position that caucasions are more ignorant than other races.

Jay wrote:I love how 2 white guys are boasting white success while their personal situations go against the statistic they present.

Here's a stat for you. 93.4% of US citizens are employed (Seattle Post Intelligencer). Congrats Harrison, you are Mr. 6.6%. Out of everyone in the US that's unemployed, 1.7% of them are caucasian. Congrats at being specialer. Oh, the national high school drop out rate is 10%. Out of that total, less than 3% of them are white.

Still

Keep at it guys...soon you will know everything about me!

finawin~

We *do* know everything about you. you tell us everything, remember? You only have to say it three times, en masse and you have done that. We got it.

let me save you the trouble of going after me and my breakup with somebody I loved and went nuts over. at least I went there. you're in your momma's house, boy.

oh snap, even araby is taking a few free jabs.

araby wrote:finawin~

We *do* know everything about you. you tell us everything, remember?

No, you don't. And no, I don't.

Markarado wrote:My statement is based on a per-capita generaization. Per-capita, caucasions are more succesful than any other race almost everywhere in the world. Yes, here are very successful Chinese, Japanese, etc... but even in those countries caucasions are generally more succesful on a per-capita basis than other races. Are you saying that I'm wrong?

It has nothing to do with superiority. It's a defense against your position that caucasions are more ignorant than other races.

If you're going to continue to boast about how "caucasions" are not ignorant, could you at least spell the fucking word correctly you idiot. It's Caucasian.

Markarado wrote:My statement is based on a per-capita generaization. Per-capita, caucasions are more succesful than any other race almost everywhere in the world. Yes, here are very successful Chinese, Japanese, etc... but even in those countries caucasions are generally more succesful on a per-capita basis than other races. Are you saying that I'm wrong?

It has nothing to do with superiority. It's a defense against your position that caucasions are more ignorant than other races.

I asked you to cite your source. All you're doing is continuing to say the same thing while re-wording it, which just makes it racist blabbering, not fact.

Also, while we're at it - please quote where it was MY position that Caucasians were more ignorant. Let's keep with the facts if we're going to go ahead and try and make a ludicrous argument without citing relevant sources - that was Drem's post, not mine. Since we've established that, moving on - no, I never said you were wrong (reading comprehension again here.) I said present some facts for what you're representing as an absolute truth, which you've yet to do.

I was going to call you out on the spelling of Caucasian as well, but it looks like Tiff beat me to it - there's 3 s's in successful, too - not 2.

Haylo wrote:If you're going to continue to boast about how "caucasions" are not ignorant, could you at least spell the fucking word correctly you idiot. It's Caucasian.

Haha, Haylo wins