namelesstavern.net

don't be retarded

OK, I exaggerated a bit. It's half of her military force!

From my side on the computer it seems like were 150 troops up on you.

I wouldn't be to quick to judge.

LOL

LoL

Heh, nice link. Found THe Axis of Just as Evil there too. Good stuff.

"Spain, Scotland, and New Zealand established the Axis of Countries That Sometimes Ask Sheep to Wear Lipstick."

"International reaction to Bush's Axis of Evil declaration was swift, as within minutes, France surrendered. "

That one is good, too.. Missed it before.

Tossica wrote:There is very little to gain financially in Sudan and unfortunately, most of our military is tied up right now. Maybe we'll get to it once Iraq is "liberated".

Could send the U.N. over there and let them restore order. Oh wait, we already did that, and they ended up just raping women and little girls.

Harrison wrote:Fuck France, and fuck the U.N. in its entirety.

We should go in and do something because it's exactly what needs to be done. We shouldn't need the approval of the rest of the world to do what is right and needs to be done.

To answer your question, yes, we should police the world. It is our world too. What happens on another corner of the planet will and does affect us.

Lastly, fuck the U.N. I fucking hate that corrupt piece of shit with all of my heart.

ANALOGY:
I don't care how big of a mutherfucker you are, but if enough smaller motherfuckers hate you they will find a way to take you down sooner or later.

No we shouldn't police the world, ESPECIALLY AFRICA OR SOUTH AMERICA FOR ANY REASON.

First Reason:

These two cultures have existed since the dawn of time. Africa is supposedly where the first men were created/beamed down from spaceships, whatever...

They have had thousands of years to get their shit together and are still an absolutely useless continent that contributes NOTHING to the advancement of the human race.

Fuck those mother fuckers.

If Africa sunk tomorrow it would be secondhand news compared to Brad and Angelina.

Second Reason:

They don't want shit to get better. If it isn't one faction making war its another. Black people love crime... Murder, rape, genocide. Its in their blood. We just have to get used to it.

Third Reason:

Most of them are muslims. These people hate westerners. The reason no one but the U.S. steps up to the plate is that they aren't stupid enough to get entangled in the mess. The muslim religion is a crock of shit. Let them kill each other off I say and Allah can sort them out.

Fourth Reason:

Like mappatzee said... We have no financial interest in Sudan. Whether the dems like it or not, if Bush's little war stabilizes the middle east the U.S. stands to make trillions.

While the liberals turn their nose at the whole idea, they sure don't fucking complain when it creates tons of jobs and brings in even more taxes to fund their social programs.


In closing I don't care about Africa or african'ts. If they all die tomorrow including the kids so fucking what? It just means less terrorists, muslims and militia to fuck up the rest of the world and drain our resources.

While on a basic level I agree with you on most of that.

I don't like the idea of hundreds of thousands being murdered by a single source. Besides, it will shut those whiny liberal cocksuckers up.

Second Reason:

They don't want shit to get better. If it isn't one faction making war its another. Black people love crime... Murder, rape, genocide. Its in their blood. We just have to get used to it.

They don't want shit to get better. If it isn't one faction making war its another. White people love crime... Murder, rape, genocide. Its in their blood. We just have to get used to it.

Hmm that seems to fit also.

Third Reason:

Most of them are muslims. These people hate westerners. The reason no one but the U.S. steps up to the plate is that they aren't stupid enough to get entangled in the mess. The muslim religion is a crock of shit. Let them kill each other off I say and Allah can sort them out.

Actually Africa is 50% Christian

Fourth Reason:

Like mappatzee said... We have no financial interest in Sudan. Whether the dems like it or not, if Bush's little war stabilizes the middle east the U.S. stands to make trillions.

So if we cant make money off it we should do it. Well I guess its true money > everything.

In closing I don't care about Africa or african'ts. If they all die tomorrow including the kids so fucking what? It just means less terrorists, muslims and militia to fuck up the rest of the world and drain our resources.

Damn man, is there anyone you dont hate?

Let them kill each other off I say and Allah can sort them out.

Troo-dat

It is Rwanda all over again.

It happens in Africa over and over for a couple of major reasons.

One is that the continent is piss poor and is comprised of a large number of different tribes that have hated each other for generations.

The other is that the Western world is primarily white and does not see an economic benefit to being involved. This war/genocide is the latest in a string of similar incidents that have been going on for centuries. An awful lot like the mess in the mid-east or the Balkans.

Should America/the UN get involved. Absolutely. Will they, not likely.

There is not enough people who care because it is happening far away and we can safely ignore what is happening.

An awful lot like the ostrich who keeps sticking its head in the sand. Absolutely tragic from a human waste.

Well, the former colonial powers made things worse by shoe-horning various tribes together into artificial nations, and then put one tribe in charge over others (like Rwanda). The Sudan is a 'smash' of Arabs, Blacks, Muslims, Animists, Christians, etc. They put the Arab Muslims in charge, and the result is everyone else reacted over time to a lack of political power.

--R.

yup


kind of like serbia/croatia = yugoslavia (and that turned out well)<----- sarcasm
czech republic/slovakia = czechloslovakia (not so bad when it poofed)