Page 2 of 4
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:25 am
by Tacks
But it's also ironic coming from you since you openly admit that you'd roll on anything that you can use as well even if it's a huge upgrade for another person.
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:38 am
by The Kizzy
I don't group with people I don't know, and we always do NBG. Mostly, I solo, 90% of the time. So it really doesn't apply to me. And if it's a uge updrage for me, and another person, then yes I am going to roll on it.
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:16 am
by Skrum
Its a shame 99% of hunters are fucktards, because one who understands his class is a valuable asset. As for pvp, you can cheese and feign/frost trap and just be an aimed shot whore or you can wing clip which isn't cheesy.
nobody cares, but everyone loves pictures
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 11:26 am
by Jeddas
Skrum wrote:Its a shame 99% of hunters are fucktards

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 3:09 pm
by Kramer
hmmmm, who knew being a hunter had so much baggage along with it....
though I ran into Ashenvale earlier and the Night Elf Rogue that tried to jump me got slaughtered by 4 lvl 60 guards... that was tender... and stupid
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 10:26 pm
by Tikker
boybutter wrote:hmmmm, who knew being a hunter had so much baggage along with it....
though I ran into Ashenvale earlier and the Night Elf Rogue that tried to jump me got slaughtered by 4 lvl 60 guards... that was tender... and stupid
Hunters came out super late in beta, and for the most part, attracted a shit ton of faggots who thought they were uber l33t
all classes contain dipshits, cocksuckers, and loot whores, but since hunters can't heal, it's easy to label them
some of the best players overall (that i know) are hunters
the worst fucking faggots i know are a mix of hunter, warlock and rogue tho
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:43 pm
by Tae-Bo
hunter pvp tip #1 - you never lose to rogues
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:55 pm
by Tae-Bo
hunter pvp tip #2 - dueling isn't pvp
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:09 pm
by Harrison
You don't lose to rogues because you run like a chickenshit each.and.every.time.
Can't lose if you don't fight.
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 pm
by Tadpole
If a Rogue gets the opening strike on a Hunter, the Rogue wins.
If a Hunter gets the opening strike on a Rogue, the Hunter wins.
I've found that is how it is a lot of times, no matter what class they are, and being around the same level.
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:30 pm
by Tacks
pretty much the only way a rogue wins without getting the opening shot is by using a net or catching up and blinding them
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 12:42 am
by The Kizzy
A good mage can own all in PVP or dueling, that is all.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:00 am
by Susvain
Couldnt agree more

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:34 am
by Langston
Kizzy wrote:A good mage can own all in PVP or dueling, that is all.
No.
I'll take a mage on with my shaman. They're not as easy as killing a hunter... but hunters are extra-special squishy just for my pleasure.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:48 am
by Jazendar
I rarely lose to any class other than other rogues...If they get the first CS they win usually, unless I can get a gouge / bandage restealth off or blind etc. Other than that a good usage of skills / professions and you shouldn't lose 1v1 in duels or pvp. Ofcourse theres always the random luck of a aimed shot crit for 2k or pom pyro for 2.5k which suck ><
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:44 am
by Jeddas
My shaman has been able to rape mages four or more levels above him always. I usually round out the battle with more than 50% mana and health.
And that stays true as he just hit 50. Actually I can only thing of one mage that ever killed me, and he jumped me while I was in a tight spot.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:25 am
by Harrison
I was untouchable by anything within 4-5 levels of me on my shaman.
The rogue got owned by shamans regularly (yes, he was on alliance unfortunately)
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:42 am
by Kramer
friend has a shaman, they tear shit up
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:46 am
by Insanityfair
Only class I have a hard time taking one on one on my priest is a rogue. Mages haven't proven to be that difficult, hunters just jump around which is annoying more than anything.
It also really depends on how retarded the person behind the toon is though.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:08 am
by xaoshaen
Having played both classes to 60, and PvPed quite a bit with each, yeah, a shaman should beat the piss out of a mage.
On the other hand, a good paladin (heh, yeah, I know) or druid should be able to gut stomp a shaman.
PvP in WoW really is fairly balanced overall.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:10 am
by xaoshaen
Insanityfair wrote:Only class I have a hard time taking one on one on my priest is a rogue. Mages haven't proven to be that difficult, hunters just jump around which is annoying more than anything.
It also really depends on how retarded the person behind the toon is though.
On my shaman, most priests don't get to cast Psychic Scream more than once before they're a puddle. The shaman's strong points just align nicely with the priest's abilities.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:15 am
by The Kizzy
I've never dueled a shaman. I never played one either, so I can't talk about things I don't know about.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:27 am
by Insanityfair
I've never dueled a Shaman I don't think, least not recently. I was more thinking in terms of bg though. I've gotten the chance to go head to head with a lot of classes that think I'm really squishy.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:28 am
by Tacks
When you play Horde you don't have to worry about shaman. And when you play against paladins all you need to do is let them pound on you while you kill the other players.
Except theres that rare 1 or 2 paladins who actually heal other players.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:31 am
by Insanityfair
Wait, there are Paladins that actually heal? Get out!