namelesstavern.net

I'm sticking with my "organisation of time travellers from a future Earth irreparably polluted who seek to rejuvenate the human race from those about to die in the past" theory.

A plane that size could have penetrated the building just like both of the planes that hit the towers, the planes traveled through each of the buildings blowing out the opposing side. Why could this not have been the exact same at the pentigon?

Structural differences between the Towers and the Pentagon.

All I'm saying is that if you look at the evidence that is available it doesn't appear to be a hit from a 757. I don't have the answers, only a theory that it appears to be a missle. The concurrently smaller holes through each ring of the Pentagon also lends to that theory. A large plane would have crumpled on impact, but much of the debris would have remained outside the building. Like the wings or tail section.

A missile of that size would have done more damage.

Harri you an expert on missles ?

Harrison wrote:A missile of that size would have done more damage.

did you even watch the video?

they showed other buildings that'd been smoked by that type of missile and the damage was very very similar

Stop and think of how someone would "hijack" a missile as was previously said.

Now try to tell me it would make it to the PENTAGON, without our knowledge.

The whole idea is ridiculous.

The problem I have with all this is that on 9-11-2001 5 things happened that have never happened before. 3 structural steel buildings collapsed due to fire and 2 airliners disintegrated to the point of being unrecogniseable.

Never before had this happened in the history of the world. And at every step of the way the Federal Government blocks complete, scientific investigation of these enigma.

I've seen all the conspiracy docs and I've read the 911 report. Personally I don't think I even want to know what really happened. Thing is, it's not without many historical preceedants.

Honestly, I'm a small fish. I'll go swim somewhere else.

SS~

Im not saying anything about a hijacked missle bro. I think 9/11 was on purpose and all the shadyness that goes along with it and wack ass shit goin on in our country is all the proof I NEED.

Stop and think clearly for a second about how terrorists may go about procuring a missle of that size. Would they A) Try to 'hijack' a destroyer, use the targeting equipment on board, manuever the ship in range of the pentagon, then fire it off all without anyones knowlege?

Or B) buy one from the fucking russians and smuggle it into the country.

I'd go with B), if it was in fact a missle.

I think it's really too much to fathom. What we're saying is that we attacked ourselves to further the aspirations of those that would conquer the world.

It's not like it hasn't happened before, many times. But would they go so low as to kill 3,000 Americans in our faces to open the floodgates for their war.

I find it really hard to belive that in this age it could be gotten away with but I'm confounded by the fact that the Federal government won't release the facts, files and footage of the events. I'm stunned and amazed.

I really don't want to belive this shit. But the more I look at it the worse it gets. When I compare the Government explanations ala the 911 report vs the scientific research I just wanna fuckin kill somebody.

But, I'm not goin there...the really sad thing is, if this did happen. They all knew, or they know now and everyone that holds political office in this country is tainted. And what they're banking on is that even if we suspect, even if we prove it. What's done is done, we'll carry on.

Maybe I'm wrong. But after almost 4 years don't ya think the Government would want to prove me wrong?

SS~

Just watch my video on page 2 please thanks~

Tikker wrote:

Harrison wrote:A missile of that size would have done more damage.

did you even watch the video?

they showed other buildings that'd been smoked by that type of missile and the damage was very very similar

he's right. The way that missile punched through all those walls is exactly what most cruise missiles do. They penetrate bunkers/buildings etc THEN explode once inside.

Do I think the missle was a tomahawk...probably not, but maybe launched from an American fighter jet...Perhaps.

Are there any aicraft capable of deploying a tomahawk? Jazendars video makes it look like the 757 that hit the second tower has one strapped on the fusealage.

Harrison wrote:Stop and think of how someone would "hijack" a missile as was previously said.

Now try to tell me it would make it to the PENTAGON, without our knowledge.

The whole idea is ridiculous.

you really didn't watch the video did you?


the 14 "hijackers"? 9 of them are still mysteriously alive and well today