Page 3 of 6
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:18 pm
by kaharthemad
Gypsiyee wrote:Xaiveir wrote:Mentally that girl was not there at all. While sure i shed a tear (not really) for her son, because he lost a mother, but honestly he can probably grow up to be "normal"
Well not her son, her daughter - her son died a 'tragic death' (overdose no doubt) a few months back at the ripe age of what, 20?
gyp her son did die of an overdose. It does not make it tradgic it makes him a product of darwin
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:22 pm
by Jay
Fox news is suggesting it as a maternity death. Over 150 days later maternity death.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:06 pm
by kinghooter00
You know what i think????
The baby is actually the sons kid.... When the son found out, he killed himself by her bedside.... later, from severe depression and self guilt, she commited suicide as well....
Take it or leave it.....
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:07 pm
by Ginzburgh
That would make some juicy fucking news.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:09 pm
by Gypsiyee
kaharthemad wrote:Gypsiyee wrote:Xaiveir wrote:Mentally that girl was not there at all. While sure i shed a tear (not really) for her son, because he lost a mother, but honestly he can probably grow up to be "normal"
Well not her son, her daughter - her son died a 'tragic death' (overdose no doubt) a few months back at the ripe age of what, 20?
gyp her son did die of an overdose. It does not make it tradgic it makes him a product of darwin
I'm aware, hence the 'tragic death' =p
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:19 pm
by Martrae
Now Zsa Zsa hub, of all people, has come out to say he might be the baby's daddy.
Go go, Drama!
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:34 pm
by kinghooter00
... She should go on Maury for a paternity test.... "I Know you my Babies Daddy"
oh....she's dead. Damn, i'm dumb.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:36 pm
by Xaiveir
kinghooter00 wrote:... She should go on Maury for a paternity test.... "I Know you my Babies Daddy"
oh....she's dead. Damn, i'm dumb.
Take her inplants on the show instead? They have the same IQ as her.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:50 pm
by Spazz
I know celebs seem like walking talking characters but you guys are talking about a real person here....... Who was alive...
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:52 pm
by Xaiveir
She was real?
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:36 pm
by Gypsiyee
her body parts damn sure weren't.
spazz, i'm sorry, but it's incredibly hard to feel bad. this is without a doubt a self inflicted death based on her age and whatnot - it's far from a tragedy if you bring it on yourself and you spent your life thinking of ways to make the most money possible with no skills, regardless of who it hurt.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:50 pm
by araby
remember when she had to have all her teeth root canaled/crowned because she was on so many uppers she ground all the enamel of her teeth? that was fucked up.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:50 pm
by Martrae
Probably TrimSpa messed up her insides and killed her
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:02 pm
by Phlegm
Her dead husband's family had her kill. First they took out the son, now her, her daughter is next. That's to make sure nobody is around to contest the judge's ruling on the will.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:12 pm
by Jay
That old man approached her several times and proposed to her back when she was a stripper. She just decided to not look a gift horse in the mouth finally. Yes she was utterly retarded but I think Gyps is making her out to sound a lot more evil than she probably is. It's not like she suckered the guy. He asked her. Think about how dumb she is and think about how possible is would be for her to fool a billionaire into giving her his fortune. Bottom line, he let it happen. She just chose to accept which if anyone here says they wouldn't at least humor the thought I think they'd be lying.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:12 pm
by Gypsiyee
It doesn't matter how it happened, what makes her evil is how she totally screwed over his family. Basically she's a whore in my eyes - being on the arm of someone for money = whore. I think I missed the memo that whores are great people.
And no Jay, I wouldn't - I'm not lying, either - my mom raised me to work for my money, not go down on some old guy.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:07 pm
by Jay
Whore I'll accept, but evil, no. I didn't say she was a great person either I'm just simply saying that she was put in a position that your average person would at least think about. Maybe it's the California in me talking but that's how I see it. Kudos to you to having an unwavering moral center that wouldn't think twice about doing something you'd be less than proud of for money but everyone has even the tiniest ounce of greed in them and when you're given the opportunity financially liberate yourself it's hard to say no.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:23 pm
by Gypsiyee
Well no, I'm not saying I have an unwavering moral center - I'm far from perfect or ideal in any regard, but there are some lines that, to me, are positively uncrossable. That's one of them.
I never said she was evil. I said she's a whore and a bad person.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:30 pm
by Spazz
Why is she the bad guy cuz some rich asshole wanted her as a trophy.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:27 pm
by Gypsiyee
She's not a bad guy because of that; she's a whore because of that.
She's a bad guy for causing so much turmoil in the family who rightfully deserved that money, and let it go to the extent of court rulings etc for her greed, which is despicable to me.
She's a bad guy because she was a bottomfeeder at best. She was an incoherent drug addict who had no credentials to do anything of worth in her life so instead she decided to get her hands down a rich mans pants to save her ass financially and put herself in the limelight for nothing of significance, but instead gain attention based on looks that weren't even her own, but that of her rich husband and her plastic surgeon.
Perhaps it was how I was raised, but it's impossible for me to hold a person like that in any regard or have any form of respect for them. It is her fault her son is dead based on the life she chose to give him, and I highly doubt had she lived throughout her daughters full childhood that she would end up any better. Unfit parent, and imo, unfit for society in general. A true waste of skin, that woman.
Here's to hoping Paris Hilton is next. (mean thing to say, and I'm sure people will be butthurt about it, but so be it~)
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:31 pm
by 10sun
Gypsiyee wrote:She's not a bad guy because of that; she's a whore because of that.
She's a bad guy for causing so much turmoil in the family who rightfully deserved that money, and let it go to the extent of court rulings etc for her greed, which is despicable to me.
She's a bad guy because she was a bottomfeeder at best. She was an incoherent drug addict who had no credentials to do anything of worth in her life so instead she decided to get her hands down a rich mans pants to save her ass financially and put herself in the limelight for nothing of significance, but instead gain attention based on looks that weren't even her own, but that of her rich husband and her plastic surgeon.
Perhaps it was how I was raised, but it's impossible for me to hold a person like that in any regard or have any form of respect for them. It is her fault her son is dead based on the life she chose to give him, and I highly doubt had she lived throughout her daughters full childhood that she would end up any better. Unfit parent, and imo, unfit for society in general. A true waste of skin, that woman.
Here's to hoping Paris Hilton is next. (mean thing to say, and I'm sure people will be butthurt about it, but so be it~)
I forget, did the dead guy leave a will and if so, who were the principle beneficiaries? If ANS was, then it stands to be reasoned, the guy was looking for someone to give the money to because his family was just waiting for him to die.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:42 pm
by Gypsiyee
as I recall, she wasn't even mentioned in her husband's will - his son I believe was named sole beneficiary and she challenged it.
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 12:23 am
by The Kizzy
she challenged it based on a verbal agreement, and she also believed that the son coerced his father to change the will shortly before he died.
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:20 am
by Gypsiyee
well I mean hell, they were only together what, a little over a year before he died?
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:41 am
by Tossica
If the family weren't greedy shitheads, they could have just offered her a few million instead of trying to cut her out completely. It was over a billion dollars for fucks sake. More than enough for everyone involved.