namelesstavern.net

Rahiem wrote:So mocking black looters is ok, but mocking black criminals is racism. Isn't looting a crime? So aren't you mocking a black criminal if you dress up like the looter guy?

Why is there always a double standard when it comes to what is viewed as racist?

the fact that the dude is black was just a coincidence

any person that would have been caught looting BEER in new orleans at the time would have been mocked the same way

it's only the attention whores that are turning it into a race issue

Harrison wrote:

Zanchief wrote:

Tikker wrote:how is it possible that every single time a white person uses the word black, uses a black crayon, dresses as a black person, mentions a black person that it's instantly racism

that's fucking stupid

How did all these words get in my mouth?

Here's a free lesson. If someone paints his/her face black, right off, he's/she's pushing it.

There's no fucking way in hell you are ever allowed to define racism.

Best leave it to the bigots...gotcha.

No, it's best to leave it to people obviously more intelligent than you.

You honestly believe that anything pertaining to black people, from a non-black, is instantly racist. You have a serious problem.

If the roles are reversed you see nothing wrong. You have a serious problem.

Racism is what you pull on here on a daily basis. Racism isn't wearing a fucking costume to a fund-raiser.

The refusal to recognize skin color & different racial backgrounds is an issue in its own right.

Harrison wrote:No, it's best to leave it to people obviously more intelligent than you.

You honestly believe that anything pertaining to black people, from a non-black, is instantly racist. You have a serious problem.

If the roles are reversed you see nothing wrong. You have a serious problem.

Racism is what you pull on here on a daily basis. Racism isn't wearing a fucking costume to a fund-raiser.

That's all assumption. I don't comment on the actions of Jesse Jackson and the rest of the attention seeking crowd he runs with, but that doesn't mean I support them, it means I'm not going to add to the news people love to heap on him, in the name of equality.

I see both sides of the argument, you do not. I'm objective, you are not. You feel it's your duty to champion the cause of reverse racism, where as I don't make a distinction between any bigotry. Worse yet, the fact that the race you are championing is your own, and you often make false claims that it is "superior" makes all of those assertions completely useless and hateful.

It's obvious that arguing with you is just forcing you to dig your heels into the excrement you pass as logic, so for the good of humanity I'll just leave you to your "beliefs". I just hope one day you'll grow up a little bit.

Now you're just fabricating slander.

There is no assumption in what I said. Seeing as I'm not the only one who sees it here.

You live in a world of extremes with no in-between. You are just like Jesse Jackson in almost every way.

You seemingly create racism just about every chance you get out of thin-air. Someone wears a costume, in a fund-raiser, to enter a contest with other people. No one thinks twice about it. Then some attention grubbing whore finds out the person was white and suddenly there's a problem where one didn't exist previously.

There is racism in there, and it's originating from the opposite end of where you think it is.

I HIGHLY doubt that person's objective was "I'm going to go as a black prisoner in an attempt to show that I think blacks are all criminals." This is your ridiculous assumption based on your belief that anyone depicting anything outside of their race is a racist. You're pathetic...

It was a very well done costume with makeup and a wig. Just entering the contest with a jumpsuit wouldn't have been a very good one at all.

Harrison wrote:You seemingly create racism just about every chance you get out of thin-air.

You posted this article to point out the reverse racism. This is the third article in the last month that you've done this. How am I the one starting anything?

I think you might want to find that mirror you gave your girlfriend and take a nice hard look into it.

Harrison wrote:There is no assumption in what I said. Seeing as I'm not the only one who sees it here.

Neither is he. Just because more than one person agrees on a matter doesn't mean it's an absolute right..

The thing is you came back into the discussion ignoring all previous posts that were made in reply and turned it right back into the crusade against Zanchief, saying the same things you say every time with different wording, whereas other people have stated things relevant to the topic at hand.

Gypsiyee wrote:

Me? I can watch a show like Criminal Minds and think of Shemar Moore as the sexy guy and Thomas Gibson as the guy in desperate need of a stripper and not even notice whether one is black or not. That's because I see people and not the color of their skin. How do you see?

Ah but you've said this, so you've obviously made the observation that they are black, which would mean you're not really seeing people, but a sexy black man that you can use to justify racist arguments.

Again wrong...I had to dig around for an example because I really couldn't remember one until I remembered someone saying on another board something about him being cute for a black guy.

Nice try, though.

Since everyone is completely missing my point, I think I'm done with this topic.

So you dug around for an example of black people (who are cute for black people) to prove that you don't notice people are black?

Come on Mar ><

Wow...way to twist that one.

Martrae wrote:Wow...way to twist that one.

Whatever, racist.

Zanchief wrote:

Harrison wrote:You seemingly create racism just about every chance you get out of thin-air.

You posted this article to point out the reverse racism. This is the third article in the last month that you've done this. How am I the one starting anything?

I think you might want to find that mirror you gave your girlfriend and take a nice hard look into it.

ding ding

I posted once before but this is worth quoting. because it's so obvious!

ok get it overwith some one needs to say it.....