Page 4 of 4
well ok then
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:45 pm
by dammuzis
tell you what everyone agree that ID wont be taut if they take the fraudulent evidence of evolution ouf of the textbooks
you know the ones
human embryos have gills (they dont)
the horse evolution chain (goes from 15 ribs to 14 to 16 back to 14 etc)
lucy and other "missing links" that have been proven false
the recent chinese dinosaur fraud Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis
the geological column (that exists nowhere but textbooks)
heck the spotted moth one is STILL in textbooks too
etc etc etc
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:46 pm
by Diekan
and Columbus "discovered" America - funny that's still being taught.
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:15 pm
by dammuzis
columbus opened america up for exploitation so in a sense he did "discover" it
when i was a kid i asked my teacher... if columbus discovered america how come there were people there already... i was sent to the principles office
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 8:48 pm
by Tikker
dammuzis wrote:columbus opened america up for exploitation so in a sense he did "discover" it
when i was a kid i asked my teacher... if columbus discovered america how come there were people there already... i was sent to the principles office
columbus wasn't even the 1st european to america
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:59 pm
by Kramer
why the hell can't people just say "here are 2 or 3 o4 views that are popularly held... here is how scientifically supported they are, let's discuss these and what makes them scientific or non-scientific....
and is the fact that something is non-scientific make it more valuable than something that isn't.....
But OH WAIT that would involve more than teaching straight science or math or reading... but going beyond that to THINKING....
no one has to fear a cetian teaching if it is shown to everyone what makes the belief what it is, whether it is experimentation or faith or a mix of both, which is what the vast majority of science is.
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 11:52 pm
by brinstar
get your ass to grammar class please
THEN worry about other subjects
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2005 12:01 am
by Thon
we learned something like Intelligent Design in philosophy(just basic survey course), they called it an Argument from Design. And i've seen some of the people that flog I.D. as teh truth use the very same argument. but then the next chapter showed how regoddamtarded it is. i don't think those guys read that far
edit - anyway, it belongs in a philosophy class, and as far away from biology/science as possible
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:21 am
by Phlegm
Tikker wrote:dammuzis wrote:columbus opened america up for exploitation so in a sense he did "discover" it
when i was a kid i asked my teacher... if columbus discovered america how come there were people there already... i was sent to the principles office
columbus wasn't even the 1st european to america
Yeah, but his publicity agent from his marketing department was better.