Page 4 of 6
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:11 am
by Zanchief
Harrison wrote:[insert graph of temperature patterns for millions of years here]
[insert thought someone else has I didn't come up with but will take as my own so I don't have to think for myself]
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:50 am
by Harrison
I forgot that this was a race to see who can say their thoughts first as to coin it as their own and forever have it trademarked.
Shut the fuck up.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:52 am
by Narrock
Diekan wrote:Oh please.
Are gluttony and greed major "sins" or not?
Does it not state in the bible than man is to take care of the Earth, or does it not?
Does the bible not state the pride is a sin?
Does the bible not state that you should not judge your fellow man?
Conservatives stand strongly behind big business - the very definition of greed of gluttony. You stand idly by and scoff at the environmentalists who are warning you that we need to stop what we're doing to the planet. Conservatives walk around very proud of what they've obtained, or mostly, what they've stolen from others. Judgemental? Do I realllllly need to point out examples of this for you?
Liberals make better Christians than do most conservatives, yet a great deal of them don't even believe in a divine creator.
The only "God" the conservatives truly worship is the mighty dollar and they will try to crush any and every one/thing that stands in their way of more and more and more and more wealth.
You're not champions for Christianity... you're hyprocites masking your true intentions behind the Cross.
Obviously you're set in your ways. I don't want to turn this into a flame war, but most people (not here on the NT though) would highly disagree with you.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 am
by Narrock
Harrison wrote:I forgot that this was a race to see who can say their thoughts first as to coin it as their own and forever have it trademarked.
Shut the fuck up.
Zanchief doesn't want to believe that "global warming" is cyclical. He wants to blame it on capitalism. lol
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:54 am
by Zanchief
Narrock wrote:Obviously you're set in your ways. I don't want to turn this into a flame war, but most people (at my church) would highly disagree with you.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:55 am
by Narrock
Zanchief wrote:Narrock wrote:Obviously you're set in your ways. I don't want to turn this into a flame war, but most people (not here on the NT though) would highly disagree with you.
Re-fixed
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:04 am
by Zanchief
Narrock wrote:Harrison wrote:I forgot that this was a race to see who can say their thoughts first as to coin it as their own and forever have it trademarked.
Shut the fuck up.
Zanchief doesn't want to believe that "global warming" is cyclical. He wants to blame it on capitalism. lol
I tend to listen to scientists with matters in the realm of science. You go right ahead and listen to pastors and holly men. They totally know what's going on with the environment.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:07 am
by Narrock
Zanchief wrote:Narrock wrote:Harrison wrote:I forgot that this was a race to see who can say their thoughts first as to coin it as their own and forever have it trademarked.
Shut the fuck up.
Zanchief doesn't want to believe that "global warming" is cyclical. He wants to blame it on capitalism. lol
I tend to listen only to liberal scientists with matters in the realm of science.
Fixt.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:23 am
by Diekan
It has nothing to do with "liberalism."
It IS highly unfortunate that environmentalism is associated with those granola eating, tree hugging, hippies that would rather we all resort back to the stone ages.
That's your problem, Mindia. The Rush's of your side use those types of people to deface the true problem behind the scene.
Conservatives support big business. Big business plays a major role in the destruction of the environment. Conservates will use any ammunition they can garner in support of big business (aka money) and to derail anything that could potentially serve as a hinderance to making a profit.
To acknowledge that there is a problem with the environment, to acknowledge that global warming is a reality is to suggest that companies will have to surrender some of their profits to modify, retrofit, change, whatever their practices and plants in order to combat the problem.
"Taking away" their profits isn't something that sits well with you.
The almighty dollar is > than the lives of thousands who die every year from fossil fuel related respiratory illnesses. The almighty dollar is > the health and well being of this planet.
These high dollar big businesses that you cherish so much have spent generations destroying the planet, ruining countless lives, putting the country in jeapordy, and embracing greed and gluttony with open arms. Yet, despite these abominations in the eyes of God - you rally around them because Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and others have you so blinded that you're unwilling to accept the truth of the matter.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:38 am
by Harrison
Yet, despite these abominations in the eyes of God - you rally around them because Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and others have you so blinded that you're unwilling to accept the truth of the matter.
And what is it if you had decided upon such a belief without the "aid" of those tools?
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:41 am
by Zanchief
Harrison wrote:Yet, despite these abominations in the eyes of God - you rally around them because Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and others have you so blinded that you're unwilling to accept the truth of the matter.
And what is it if you had decided upon such a belief without the "aid" of those tools?
Dishonesty.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:45 am
by Harrison
Unlike you and your ilk, I lack the need to watch T.V. or listen to hypocritical political pundits for direction in my beliefs.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:51 am
by Arlos
Me either, I can't stand political pundits of either side. So, instead, I actually read the reports on the science itself. Guess what I've learned from examining the actual science: Global warming is real, humans are contributing to it, and it's going to get worse unless we take action immediately.
-Arlos
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:51 am
by Narrock
Diekan wrote:It has nothing to do with "liberalism."
It IS highly unfortunate that environmentalism is associated with those granola eating, tree hugging, hippies that would rather we all resort back to the stone ages.
That's your problem, Mindia. The Rush's of your side use those types of people to deface the true problem behind the scene.
Conservatives support big business. Big business plays a major role in the destruction of the environment. Conservates will use any ammunition they can garner in support of big business (aka money) and to derail anything that could potentially serve as a hinderance to making a profit.
To acknowledge that there is a problem with the environment, to acknowledge that global warming is a reality is to suggest that companies will have to surrender some of their profits to modify, retrofit, change, whatever their practices and plants in order to combat the problem.
"Taking away" their profits isn't something that sits well with you.
The almighty dollar is > than the lives of thousands who die every year from fossil fuel related respiratory illnesses. The almighty dollar is > the health and well being of this planet.
These high dollar big businesses that you cherish so much have spent generations destroying the planet, ruining countless lives, putting the country in jeapordy, and embracing greed and gluttony with open arms. Yet, despite these abominations in the eyes of God - you rally around them because Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and others have you so blinded that you're unwilling to accept the truth of the matter.
I don't care for Rush Limbag, nor do I care for big corporations running everything into the ground. You are
generalizing big time. I do like Sean Hannity though. I do care for the environment. I recyle. I don't litter. You might say that "I play my part" in environmental conservation efforts. I also know that global warming is cyclical, and that you cannot blame global warming on big bad corporations and diesel trucks emitting ozone-depleting particulates.
Frankly, I don't care what you think Diekan. You're just another arm-chair quarterback spewing forth crap you listen to from biased sources like "algore, the complete retard" or The New York Crimes. You also displayed what little you actually knew about me. No surprise there though.
HINT: Just because people label themselves as "Conservative," doesn't mean they support big oil corporations or other unethical corporations like Enron. It also doesn't mean that they don't care for the environment.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:54 am
by Harrison
arlos wrote:Me either, I can't stand political pundits of either side. So, instead, I actually read the reports on the science itself. Guess what I've learned from examining the actual science: Global warming is real, humans are contributing to it, and it's going to get worse unless we take action immediately.
-Arlos
That's exactly my point entirely. We are not the cause. We are simply not helping the situation any with our lack of care for environmental repercussions in most of what we do industrially.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:54 am
by Zanchief
Harrison wrote:Unlike you and your ilk, I lack the need to watch T.V. or listen to hypocritical political pundits for direction in my beliefs.
Awesome, I'm an Ilk.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:56 am
by Diekan
Narrock wrote:
Frankly, I don't care what you think Diekan. You're just another arm-chair quarterback spewing forth crap you listen to from biased sources like "algore, the complete retard" or The New York Crimes.
Really? I guess I'm just wasting my time earning a Master's degree (one year to go) in BIOLOGY - backed by a Bachelor's degree in BIOLOGY.
Yeah... really... lol... you dolt.
Hey look I pulled a Rust!
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:58 am
by Harrison
Biology has exactly what to do with environmental sciences may I ask? (I'm not being a prick entirely. I am just curious if there is a relation that is relevant to this discussion)
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:59 am
by Zanchief
Diekan wrote:Narrock wrote:
Frankly, I don't care what you think Diekan. You're just another arm-chair quarterback spewing forth crap you listen to from biased sources like "algore, the complete retard" or The New York Crimes.
Really? I guess I'm just wasting my time earning a Master's degree (one year to go) in BIOLOGY - backed by a Bachelor's degree in BIOLOGY.
Yeah... really... lol... you dolt.
Hey look I pulled a Rust!
Watch it Diek, education is a sign on NT.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:59 am
by Diekan
Harrison wrote:Biology has exactly what to do with environmental sciences may I ask? (I'm not being a prick entirely. I am just curious if there is a relation that is relevant to this discussion)
You're kidding, right?
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:02 pm
by Arlos
Mindia, I think I've established, at least to a reasonable degree, the fact that I know what I'm talkijgn about when it comes to science matters, yes? Well, I tell you once more, that Global Warming *IS* real, period. Yes, there are cyclical effects to the climate. However, what we are doing is, at the very least, massively accelerating those changes, which has potentially dire effects. Animals and systems which have adapted to changes that might take, say, 10,000 years, are not going to be able to handle the changes if they take, say, 100. And that's what we're doing.
It would *NOT* cost us that much to adhere to the Kyoto provisions; Bush's figure of "5 million jobs" is a farce that was pulled out of a hat, and has no basis in fact. Yes, some large industrial and power companies would be forced to eat large chunks of their current profits to re-invest in their business to pay for pollution control upgrades, and some might even lose jobs. However, there will be large numbers of new jobs that open up at the businesses that produce those pollution controls.
As for Al Gore, did you know that pretty muche very environmental scientist that I've read about that has seen his movie says that it is just about spot on? Dislike the man all you want, and I know you do, but that doesn't necessarily mean that his message is necessarily invalid. I know you don't think he'd be a good president, but that's not what the discussion is about at this point.
-Arlos
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:03 pm
by Arlos
Biology has exactly what to do with environmental sciences may I ask? (I'm not being a prick entirely. I am just curious if there is a relation that is relevant to this discussion)
That is quite possibly the single most retarded thing I've ever seen you say, Harrison, and that's saying a lot.
-Arlos
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:07 pm
by Harrison
Now that I think about what I said, I agree with you on that!
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:25 pm
by Diekan
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:00 pm
by Snero
you don't need a degree, or even to read the news to find out about the latest developments in science, from global warming to long term effects of smoking pot you can find all sorts of studies here
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=pubmed. I did most of my thesis research here, it's an invaluable site to find out what the scientific community is up to.
edit: fixed it so the link worked