Page 4 of 7

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:34 am
by Gargamellow
:hiphop:

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:13 am
by 10sun
Hey, should I take my high school sweetheart or my old friend from college out this Christmas break?

All 3 of us are single, haven't seen either of them in quite some time... just an occassional online chat with one and a phone call every couple months with the other.

They both lead busy lives, one is up in Wisconsin most of the year and the other lives in Columbus, but works 60+ hours a week.

Decisions!

This one is 50/50 where it doesn't matter THAT much to me anymore. So I leave it to you, the internet to make my decision for me.

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:19 am
by Harrison
College friend, because high school "anythings" have a bad habit of being nothings this much later in life.

At least with the college friend they were a bit more mature when you first met them, right?

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:28 am
by 10sun
Harrison wrote:College friend, because high school "anythings" have a bad habit of being nothings this much later in life.

At least with the college friend they were a bit more mature when you first met them, right?


High School friend isn't bad, she has grown considerably, no longer is she the one drink date. She finished college and works for the EPA researching fisheries in Wisconsin or some shit.

If anything, over the past couple years we've grown closer since a bad breakup right after high school graduation(she was leaving, I was pissed, we both slept with each other's best friends to spite one another etc).

College girl and I were never as close. We were just friends who could make each other laugh, have good dates. She is allergic to shellfish and thus doesn't eat seafood at all (I WANT MY SASHIMI GODDAMNIT), so thats a big negative, plus one of the biggest drunk ramblings is how much she loves big black cocks(dead serious!). So yeah.

Its a tie game for both of them at this point.

I think I have a better future with high school girl, but college girl is a bit more fun for short term stuff ><

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:31 am
by Harrison
Fisheries in....WISCONSIN? wtf

Do they even have a lake large enough for fish? :wink:

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:31 am
by 10sun
Harrison wrote:Fisheries in....WISCONSIN? wtf

Do they even have a lake large enough for fish? :wink:


hell if I know, all I know is that she is about the only girl I know of that wears Waders to work =P

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:36 am
by Tuggan
big black cocks? thats an automatic loss buddy.

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:21 am
by Tossica
Harrison wrote:Fisheries in....WISCONSIN? wtf

Do they even have a lake large enough for fish? :wink:



Wisconsin borders the biggest lake in the world.

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:49 pm
by Tuggan
north america.

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 1:07 pm
by Tossica
Lake Superior is the biggest lake in the world.

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 1:21 pm
by araby
Jimmy Durante wrote:
kinghooter00 wrote:i've talked to alot of chicks and they just love going out and dancing.

The "dancing" at "dance clubs" is not dancing at all, but rather a primal mating call. Expect an upcoming study from Jane Goodall.


this is the answer to your question though many people dancing at the clubs don't even know it

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:03 pm
by Tuggan
only in surface area, baikal is much larger in terms of volume.

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:45 pm
by Tossica
Tuggan wrote:only in surface area, baikal is much larger in terms of volume.


Thanks Google!

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:46 pm
by Tuggan
I live in Michigan, they teach us all about the great lakes.

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:39 pm
by Evermore
she's cheating on you with diekan.

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:13 pm
by Gypsiyee
Harrison wrote:Fisheries in....WISCONSIN? wtf

Do they even have a lake large enough for fish? :wink:


We sure do - we have Fish Fry every Friday here - perch, cod, pike.. we do alright =)

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:57 pm
by Harrison
When I was in Detroit I had a pretty damned good lake Perch platter, fried, baked, etc.

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:19 pm
by Tossica
Tuggan wrote:I live in Michigan, they teach us all about the great lakes.


If you know all about the great lakes then you know that Lake Superior is the largest fresh water lake in the world (period)

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:46 pm
by Arlos
Actually, Tuggan's right.

Lake Superior has the largest surface area of any lake in the world, but Baikal blows it away for volume.

Lake Superior has a surface area of 31,820 square miles, and a volume of 2900 cubic miles.

Lake Baikal only has a surface area of 12,159 square kilometers, but a volume of 5,521 cubic miles. Actually, Lake Baikal, by volume, holds more water than all of the Great Lakes combined.

The reason is, Lake Baikal is incredibly deep. It averages 2500 ft deep, and gets as deep as 5400. Lake Superior, however, averages less than 500 feet deep, and only gets to about 1350 at max.

Thank you, :google:

-Arlos

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:58 pm
by Tae-Bo
deep lakes are scary

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:06 pm
by Harrison
Tossica wrote:
Tuggan wrote:I live in Michigan, they teach us all about the great lakes.


If you know all about the great lakes then you know that Lake Superior is the largest fresh water lake in the world (period)


*gasp* Tossica DOESN'T know everything as he tries to make it appear?!

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:25 pm
by KaiineTN
I think I remember reading that Baikal is on an active fault line or something too, there's hot springs around there etc.

That'd one thing that would be cool to see sometime, natural hot springs. You guys ever been to any?

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:52 pm
by Gargamellow
i would take them both out and see which one wants me more

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:40 pm
by Jay
I knew a guy named Baikal who played EVERQUEST.

Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:30 am
by Tossica
Haha. What a ridiculous argument. My statement holds true.