Page 4 of 5

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 6:33 pm
by Yamori
You just proved my point Yamori, yet you don't even see it. THE SOUTH wanted this and the SOUTH wanted that... blah blah blah. The SOUTH was not equal to what the country as a whole wanted. Copout? LOL, no. Your boat just sunk to the bottom of Davy Jones' locker.


I could argue that most people in the north didn't give a shit about what happened to the black man, and that it was a small minority (and a few politicians when new states were created) making an uproar about slavery until the very END of the civil war where they made freeing the slaves an issue to boost morale. But whatever.

Ok, how about this.

During REVOLUTIONARY times, the majority was for slavery and the refusal of political rights to women and blacks.

You , Arlos, Gidan, Rust, and the rest of your ilk all subscribe to the same puerile points of view, thus giving yourselves a strong support network... /snooze So, lauding yourselves as victorious in any thread is completely laughable.


Haha, my "ilk." Good one. I disagree with them on plenty of issues. I'm sure we disagree like hell ass when it comes to economics.

I doubt I'm in any "ilk" on this board.

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 6:57 pm
by Narrock
brinstar wrote:
Mindia wrote:So, lauding yourselves as victorious in any thread is completely laughable.


more people on this board disagree with you than agree with you

by your logic, that makes you wrong

thx drive thru


That's because of my statement that most of you subscribe to the same points of view. That's some ownage there...

lol

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 7:00 pm
by Narrock
Yamori wrote:
You just proved my point Yamori, yet you don't even see it. THE SOUTH wanted this and the SOUTH wanted that... blah blah blah. The SOUTH was not equal to what the country as a whole wanted. Copout? LOL, no. Your boat just sunk to the bottom of Davy Jones' locker.


I could argue that most people in the north didn't give a shit about what happened to the black man, and that it was a small minority (and a few politicians when new states were created) making an uproar about slavery until the very END of the civil war where they made freeing the slaves an issue to boost morale. But whatever.

Ok, how about this.

During REVOLUTIONARY times, the majority was for slavery and the refusal of political rights to women and blacks.

You , Arlos, Gidan, Rust, and the rest of your ilk all subscribe to the same puerile points of view, thus giving yourselves a strong support network... /snooze So, lauding yourselves as victorious in any thread is completely laughable.


Haha, my "ilk." Good one. I disagree with them on plenty of issues. I'm sure we disagree like hell ass when it comes to economics.

I doubt I'm in any "ilk" on this board.


Nice backpedal attempt, but... no. You align yourself more with left-leaning philosphies than right. You cannot win this argument.

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 7:08 pm
by Drem
uh, the majority wanted us to fight in vietnam? are you sure about that? last time i checked, just about everyone hated vietnam

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 8:10 pm
by Narrock
Of course the war protestors were against it. The type of idiots who waved the "No War for Oil" signs last year are the same type of idiots we saw in the late 60's to early 70's waving the "Baby Killers" signs at the US GI's returning home from Vietnam.

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 8:57 pm
by Yamori
Nice backpedal attempt, but... no. You align yourself more with left-leaning philosphies than right. You cannot win this argument.


I'm just about as liberal as the founding fathers were... I'm a constitutionalist who is conservative on economics and liberal on some social issues (excluding gun control, and affirmative action or hatecrimes).

If I had to pick, I lean more right than left.

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:12 pm
by Narrock
Yamori wrote:
Nice backpedal attempt, but... no. You align yourself more with left-leaning philosphies than right. You cannot win this argument.


I'm just about as liberal as the founding fathers were... I'm a constitutionalist who is conservative on economics and liberal on some social issues (excluding gun control, and affirmative action or hatecrimes).

If I had to pick, I lean more right than left.


Well, I am glad to hear that then.

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 2:35 pm
by Lueyen
Mindia wrote:Of course the war protestors were against it. The type of idiots who waved the "No War for Oil" signs last year are the same type of idiots we saw in the late 60's to early 70's waving the "Baby Killers" signs at the US GI's returning home from Vietnam.


I was not yet born at the time, but my understanding of it from talking with friends and relatives that were was that the people "baby killer" signs were the extremist minority. Many people did not support the war, and didn't like the fact that we were involved, but they didn't blame our troops. I don't think you can group every Vietnam war protester in the Jane Fonda camp.

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 2:42 pm
by Narrock
Lueyen wrote:
Mindia wrote:Of course the war protestors were against it. The type of idiots who waved the "No War for Oil" signs last year are the same type of idiots we saw in the late 60's to early 70's waving the "Baby Killers" signs at the US GI's returning home from Vietnam.


I was not yet born at the time, but my understanding of it from talking with friends and relatives that were was that the people "baby killer" signs were the extremist minority. Many people did not support the war, and didn't like the fact that we were involved, but they didn't blame our troops. I don't think you can group every Vietnam war protester in the Jane Fonda camp.


I wasn't lumping them all in with the Jane Fonda crowd, but just take a look at the mindset of protestors... that kind of just speaks for itself.

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:04 pm
by Gypsiyee
hey so I heard this thread was about Terry Schiavo

guess that wasn't true though

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:07 pm
by Narrock
Terry Schiavo? What gave you that impression? lol

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:08 pm
by mofish
When Mindia starts posting, all bets are off.

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:11 pm
by Narrock
I just don't put up with BS. Get used to it.

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:50 pm
by Zanchief
Mindia wrote:I just don't put up with BS.


You must hate yourself.

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:52 pm
by Narrock
Zanchief wrote:
Mindia wrote:I just don't put up with BS.


You must hate yourself.


/sigh

What grade are you in?

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:10 pm
by Zanchief
Mindia wrote:
Zanchief wrote:
Mindia wrote:I just don't put up with BS.


You must hate yourself.


/sigh

What grade are you in?


3 but it's online so who knows.

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:31 pm
by Darcler
HAHA

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:35 am
by Gidan
Mindia wrote:
Lueyen wrote:
Mindia wrote:Of course the war protestors were against it. The type of idiots who waved the "No War for Oil" signs last year are the same type of idiots we saw in the late 60's to early 70's waving the "Baby Killers" signs at the US GI's returning home from Vietnam.


I was not yet born at the time, but my understanding of it from talking with friends and relatives that were was that the people "baby killer" signs were the extremist minority. Many people did not support the war, and didn't like the fact that we were involved, but they didn't blame our troops. I don't think you can group every Vietnam war protester in the Jane Fonda camp.


I wasn't lumping them all in with the Jane Fonda crowd, but just take a look at the mindset of protestors... that kind of just speaks for itself.


Does that go for all protesters? I have seen far more religious protesters then anything else. Most of the Christian or Catholic.

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:33 am
by Rust
Gidan wrote:
Mindia wrote:
Lueyen wrote:
Mindia wrote:Of course the war protestors were against it. The type of idiots who waved the "No War for Oil" signs last year are the same type of idiots we saw in the late 60's to early 70's waving the "Baby Killers" signs at the US GI's returning home from Vietnam.


I was not yet born at the time, but my understanding of it from talking with friends and relatives that were was that the people "baby killer" signs were the extremist minority. Many people did not support the war, and didn't like the fact that we were involved, but they didn't blame our troops. I don't think you can group every Vietnam war protester in the Jane Fonda camp.


I wasn't lumping them all in with the Jane Fonda crowd, but just take a look at the mindset of protestors... that kind of just speaks for itself.


Does that go for all protesters? I have seen far more religious protesters then anything else. Most of the Christian or Catholic.


What does Mindia think of Fred Phelps, I wonder?

--R.

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 2:18 pm
by mofish
Fred Phelps is a good christian man, trying to save our country from Satan.

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:22 pm
by Insanityfair
Gypsiyee wrote:hey so I heard this thread was about Terry Schiavo

guess that wasn't true though


Indeed...I must have taken a wrong turn somewhere.... :rofl:

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:48 pm
by Lueyen
Insanityfair wrote:
Gypsiyee wrote:hey so I heard this thread was about Terry Schiavo

guess that wasn't true though


Indeed...I must have taken a wrong turn somewhere.... :rofl:


No this thread is now about the fact that this thread is no longer about Terry Shiavo. :eyecrazy:

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:29 pm
by Narrock
Gidan wrote:
Mindia wrote:
Lueyen wrote:
Mindia wrote:Of course the war protestors were against it. The type of idiots who waved the "No War for Oil" signs last year are the same type of idiots we saw in the late 60's to early 70's waving the "Baby Killers" signs at the US GI's returning home from Vietnam.


I was not yet born at the time, but my understanding of it from talking with friends and relatives that were was that the people "baby killer" signs were the extremist minority. Many people did not support the war, and didn't like the fact that we were involved, but they didn't blame our troops. I don't think you can group every Vietnam war protester in the Jane Fonda camp.


I wasn't lumping them all in with the Jane Fonda crowd, but just take a look at the mindset of protestors... that kind of just speaks for itself.


Does that go for all protesters? I have seen far more religious protesters then anything else. Most of the Christian or Catholic.


I think I may have seen a few religious protestors but they don't really stand out in my mind.

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:31 pm
by Narrock
Rust wrote:
Gidan wrote:
Mindia wrote:
Lueyen wrote:
Mindia wrote:Of course the war protestors were against it. The type of idiots who waved the "No War for Oil" signs last year are the same type of idiots we saw in the late 60's to early 70's waving the "Baby Killers" signs at the US GI's returning home from Vietnam.


I was not yet born at the time, but my understanding of it from talking with friends and relatives that were was that the people "baby killer" signs were the extremist minority. Many people did not support the war, and didn't like the fact that we were involved, but they didn't blame our troops. I don't think you can group every Vietnam war protester in the Jane Fonda camp.


I wasn't lumping them all in with the Jane Fonda crowd, but just take a look at the mindset of protestors... that kind of just speaks for itself.


Does that go for all protesters? I have seen far more religious protesters then anything else. Most of the Christian or Catholic.


What does Mindia think of Fred Phelps, I wonder?

--R.


I think Fred Phelps is a fanatic.

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:18 pm
by Gidan
Mindia wrote:
Gidan wrote:
Mindia wrote:
Lueyen wrote:
Mindia wrote:Of course the war protestors were against it. The type of idiots who waved the "No War for Oil" signs last year are the same type of idiots we saw in the late 60's to early 70's waving the "Baby Killers" signs at the US GI's returning home from Vietnam.


I was not yet born at the time, but my understanding of it from talking with friends and relatives that were was that the people "baby killer" signs were the extremist minority. Many people did not support the war, and didn't like the fact that we were involved, but they didn't blame our troops. I don't think you can group every Vietnam war protester in the Jane Fonda camp.


I wasn't lumping them all in with the Jane Fonda crowd, but just take a look at the mindset of protestors... that kind of just speaks for itself.


Does that go for all protesters? I have seen far more religious protesters then anything else. Most of the Christian or Catholic.


I think I may have seen a few religious protestors but they don't really stand out in my mind.


I remember every single morning passing a group of chrisitan protesters at every single planned parenthood in the area of NY I lived. They stood out there from 7am to 7pm 7 days a week. Always screaming and yelling, taking pictures of the girls going in every girl regadless of why she was there and telling them they are going to post the pictures all over the internet as the murderes they were.

The ones at the Planned Parenthood closest to me would een come as a group on Sunday morning. THey would goto church at 6am, then straight from church in 1 big van they would go straight to the Planned Parenthood.

My graduation was protested by christians because the speaker was pro choice and didn't hate gays.

My GF graduation at the time was protested by christians.

I can go on and on, 99% of the protesters I have seen were religious almost all chrisitan.