Page 1 of 2
Wii
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:21 pm
by Phlegm
From Reuters:
LOS ANGELES - Nintendo Co. Ltd on Thursday said it has named its new video game console “Wii, which it said is pronounced “weâ€
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:32 pm
by Narrock
That will be fun for little kids.
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:10 pm
by Durothil Skyreaver
I'm curious to see how the back catalogue of games works.
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:27 pm
by Tikker
wtf, Wii?
revolution was actually a good name for a console
I'm really curious to see this in action, what with the back catalogue, and the supposedly revolutionary controller
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:27 pm
by Lyion
Mindia wrote:That will be fun for little kids.
and big ones. The gamecube is a great console and gets the most use in my household.
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 4:57 pm
by Phlegm
From CNBC
LOS ANGELES - Third-place Nintendo showed off its next-generation game console Tuesday, taking shots at its rivals as it promised that "Wii" would be about improving the actual game experience, not just high-tech graphics.
Nintendo said Wii would be released in the fourth quarter of 2006, but did not give a specific release date. Reggie Fils-Aime, Nintendo of America’s executive vice president of sales and marketing, said pricing details for the console will be announced later.
CNBC's Jim Goldman reported that he had unofficially been told to expect a price tag of between $249 and $299 and a release date similar to Sony's PlayStation 3, which is Nov. 17 in North America.
Nintendo also showed off its unusual wireless controller, which looks a bit like a large TV remote. Players can use it in different ways depending on the game they're playing — as a golf club during a golf game, or as a bat in a baseball game, for example. Sony on Monday unveiled a controller that also uses motion-sensing technology, but to a less dramatic extent.
If the $249 report is correct, the Wii would be priced at more than half the cheapest PS3 and substantially cheaper than Microsoft's Xbox 360, which was released last fall.
This would be in keeping with Nintendo's general console strategy, which has been to emphasize its relative low cost and family-friendly games. While the Wii will have only slightly more power than Nintendo's current GameCube system, both the Xbox 360 and the PS3 took huge leaps in power and boast high-definition graphics.
Sony is the dominant player among video game consoles, with 64 percent of the market. Microsoft has 16 percent; Nintendo 13 percent.
Fils-Aime took indirect aim at its rivals' high-tech strategy at the news conference Tuesday, a day before the official start of the video game industry's annual conference, the Electronic Entertainment Expo in Los Angeles.
"What we're unveiling is the next leap in gaming, to a place where playing is no longer just about looks, it's about the feel," Fils-Aime said. "Where it's no longer confined to just a few, it's about everyone. And most of all, the next leap is not about what you see. ... The next leap is about playing, because playing is believing."
He added that the next version of the popular “Legend of Zeldaâ€
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 5:04 pm
by Durothil Skyreaver
I'm more interested in seeing Wii then PS3 actually. This'll be more than just updated graphics with the same tired gameplay.
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 5:05 pm
by Phlegm
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 5:15 pm
by brinstar
lyion wrote:Mindia wrote:That will be fun for little kids.
and big ones. The gamecube is a great console and gets the most use in my household.
same here
sometimes months will go by before anyone turns on the ps2
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 7:47 pm
by Tikker
i'm really curious to see ps3 and wii
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 9:13 pm
by Rotj
worst name ever
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 10:52 pm
by brinstar
i will agree with that, wii is a stupid-ass name for sure
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 6:43 pm
by Alphonso
this is the console i will be buying. The other two seem like weak computers, but this one is actually looking like it will offer things a computer cant.
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 11:44 am
by Phlegm
The company announced that their new machine, Wii, would not exceed $250 in America. Nintendo also said it plans to ship 6 million systems between its launch in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the end of its fiscal year in March 2007.
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 11:54 am
by Tikker
I'm really intrigued by the potential this system has
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:40 pm
by Muglack
Wii is the only way to fly. You can buy a Wii (plus a second controller and 2 games) and XBox 360 (plus a second controller and two games) for the price of a PS3. XBox 360 is underperofmrming the only thing that keeps it going is XBox live, and PS3 is gonna be a big bag of suck. The Wii is gonna be able to be able to go online (this is how you get almost the complete catalogue of Nintendo games, you simply connect to the game server and download them) games like Smash Bros is going to have online play (HAWT!) and the new 3-D mouse idea will crush the competitors.
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:55 pm
by Tikker
the PS3's potential to playBlu-ray dvd's, be a networked media server as well as having a big stable of games makes it really attractive to people too
the largish price will make it harder to purchase for people who are on the fence tho
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:06 pm
by Muglack
Blu-ray is bullshit. By the time PS3 omes out and Blu-Ray is a viable option for home movies the Chinese wholesale companies will be producing them at such a reduced cost that you'll be able to buy one from walmart for a hundred dollars (look at DVD players). As for the stable of games you'll be able to access almost every title nintendo has ever released on the Wii, there's nothing that can compare to that. Networked Media server? XBox 360 can already do that, and noone does it.
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:14 pm
by Tikker
Muglack wrote:Blu-ray is bullshit. By the time PS3 omes out and Blu-Ray is a viable option for home movies the Chinese wholesale companies will be producing them at such a reduced cost that you'll be able to buy one from walmart for a hundred dollars (look at DVD players). As for the stable of games you'll be able to access almost every title nintendo has ever released on the Wii, there's nothing that can compare to that. Networked Media server? XBox 360 can already do that, and noone does it.
xbox requires a fileserver running MCE, which is retardedly stupid
I've got over 800gb of movies on a fileserver that I currently stream to my HTPC. I'd definately do it with the PS3
And as for the nintendo games you can access, that's slick, but you have to buy each one you download, they're not free
if they were all free, it'd be a slamdunk no brainer
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:19 pm
by Thon
wtf is blu-ray, and how is it so different from a regular DVD to make the ps3 cost as retardedly much as it does
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:27 pm
by Ginzburgh
And as for the nintendo games you can access, that's slick, but you have to buy each one you download, they're not free
I wonder how much they will cost.
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:31 pm
by Muglack
I heard it ranges from 99 cents for old school games to a couple bucks for GameCube/N64 games.
Blu-Ray is Sony's version of HD-DvD. Sadly it's going to get crushed by HD-DvD the same way the VHS crushed Beta when they tried to get greedy. Mitsu-something or other the company that owns the rights to HD-DvD has already said they are willing to lose money on players by forfeiting their patent rights and letting the Chinese companies start producing them right out of the gates. Plus a majority of the movie houses are backing HD-DvD as well as Microsoft.
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 3:55 pm
by Tikker
toshiba owns HD-dvd and i've heard no such nonsense about waving patent rights
besides, sony owns 40% of all movie titles ever made, so whatever sony chooses, especially if they get 14+million PS3's sold as planned will go a long way towards settling the format war
every other movie house will support both formats until blu-ray becomes the defacto standard
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 3:58 pm
by Lionking
In the VHS vs. Beta wars, Sony was on the Beta side....

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:16 pm
by Tikker
Lionking wrote:In the VHS vs. Beta wars, Sony was on the Beta side....

sony didn't own all the movie companies then tho
this way they control more content than anyone else