namelesstavern.net

Well i'm suprised it hasn't been posted yet but you can find the video here.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/

It doesn't look like you see the plane hitting the pentagon, just the big explosion aftewards.

I watched that on the news last night.. I didn't like it.

I can remember watching those when it first happened. Did they suddenly pull them from the media for the trial or something?

Barbara Olson died in that one.

Martrae wrote:I can remember watching those when it first happened. Did they suddenly pull them from the media for the trial or something?

Seems that they couldn't release this video because of the trial of the musaoui guy (forgot his name and i'm too lazy to google it.)

that doesnt look like a 757 to me.

Naethyn9 wrote:that doesnt look like a 757 to me.

Oh God, we're we go with the conspiracy theories...

You want a conspiracy theory?

http://www.loosechange911.com

Those people are fucked in the head.

Oh God, we're we go with the conspiracy theories...

He's just stating an opinion. Just like "Barbara Olson was a cunt" is an opinion too.

Ginzburgh wrote:

Oh God, we're we go with the conspiracy theories...

He's just stating an opinion. Just like "Barbara Olson was a cunt" is an opinion too.

Can you post in one single thread without being an ass? Just wondering.

Mindia wrote:

Ginzburgh wrote:

Oh God, we're we go with the conspiracy theories...

He's just stating an opinion. Just like "Barbara Olson was a cunt" is an opinion too.

Can you post in one single thread without being an ass? Just wondering.

I like Ginz' posts.

Zanchief wrote:

Mindia wrote:

Ginzburgh wrote:

Oh God, we're we go with the conspiracy theories...

He's just stating an opinion. Just like "Barbara Olson was a cunt" is an opinion too.

Can you post in one single thread without being an ass? Just wondering.

I like Ginz' posts.

You would.

that doesn't look like a plane at all. More like a cruise missle.

Too bad they missed Rumsfeld. Bastard Muslims fuck up everything.

O M F G!

Lyion said something negative about a member of the Bush administration! Someone alert Ripley's! Mark this day on your calender, boys and girls, for surely we shall never see its like again!

-Arlos

Naethyn9 wrote:that doesnt look like a 757 to me.

didn't look like a 757 to me either


my initial impression was that it was a much smaller plane, like a private jet or a cesna (something of the 10-14 passenger or smaller type)

in the 1st video all you acn really see is some sort of white tube
could be a plane, could just as easily be a missle


in the 2nd video it definately looks like you can see cockpit windows, but of a small plane

How close was the plane to the camera? That could explain that. I couldnt get a clear shot of the plane.

I think in both videos it appears like you see what is left of a plane AFTER it hit the ground, like it hit just before it came into camera veiw then what you see is what looks like the fusulage(sp) hit the building, like it bounced off the ground slightly then into the building.

Can you post in one single thread without being an ass? Just wondering.

How was I being an ass?

Looks quite similair to a tomahawk missle to me. Anyone, if anyone can find a picture of the wreckage of a plane in the aftermath of the Pentagon incident, I'd dearly love to see it. Planes don't disintegrate on impact.

Ginzburgh wrote:

Can you post in one single thread without being an ass? Just wondering.

How was I being an ass?

You had an opinion that was different than his. Duh. Quit being an ass.

Looked like a small plane to me. Maybe I saw it wrong, but it looked like it dragged a bit on the ground before impact. Missles don't do that.

You do know the plane penetrated to the ground floor of the third ring and damaged all five rings, right? The roof then collapsed upon whatever wreckage was left.

Here's a small pic though.

K, sure. Then why is the hole in the outer wall round like the wings sheared off outside? Yet no wings? No landing gear? Nothing? I'm not going as far as saying "We shot a missle into our own building." I'm saying it wasn't a plane, or at least not the plane they claimed it to be. You're believing what you were told, and I'm simply asking where is the evidence to back it up.

Martrae wrote:You do know the plane penetrated to the ground floor of the third ring and damaged all five rings, right? The roof then collapsed upon whatever wreckage was left.

The noses of airplanes are made of material that could NOT possibly grind through 5 layers of the pentagon. Look at any picture of airplane impacts and you'll see that they crumple just on straight-to-ground impacts alone.


Combined with what Minrott has already said... that planes cannot and do not disintegrate - and that the holes have no wing markings whatsoever --- it simply doesn't add up. Take a look at pictures of missile/plane impacts and compare... It was a missile.

Yamori wrote:

Martrae wrote:You do know the plane penetrated to the ground floor of the third ring and damaged all five rings, right? The roof then collapsed upon whatever wreckage was left.

The noses of airplanes are made of material that could NOT possibly grind through 5 layers of the pentagon. Look at any picture of airplane impacts and you'll see that they crumple just on straight-to-ground impacts alone.


Combined with what Minrott has already said... that planes cannot and do not disintegrate - and that the holes have no wing markings whatsoever --- it simply doesn't add up. Take a look at pictures of missile/plane impacts and compare... It was a missile.

I really tempted to agree