Page 1 of 1
Applause please.
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:49 pm
by Evermore
Okla. Governor Approves Executing Molesters
By TIM TALLEY, Associated Press Writer
1 hour ago
OKLAHOMA CITY - Oklahoma on Friday became the fifth state to allow the death penalty for repeat child molesters, although legal scholars questioned the constitutionality of the new state law.
Similar statutes already are in place in Florida, Louisiana and Montana, and South Carolina's governor signed a similar law on Thursday.
Oklahoma Gov. Brad Henry didn't discuss the measure Friday as he signed it into law.
The law makes the death penalty an option for anyone convicted of a second or subsequent conviction for rape, sodomy or lewd molestation involving a child under 14.
Defense attorneys and death penalty experts said the measure defies recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have scaled back the death penalty's application.
Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington, said the sex offender bills are a reaction to public outcry over the frequency and seriousness of sex offenses, and the attention they receive in the media.
No one convicted of a sex offense has been executed since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment 30 years ago, though one inmate is on death row in Louisiana following his 2003 conviction for raping an 8-year-old girl.
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:52 pm
by Tikker
why restrict to people who rape/sodomize/molest kids under 14?
should just be anyone who does it to anyone
ps, i'm all for death penalty for these types of offences
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:58 pm
by Captain Insano
I would say 15 and below....at 16 you should see the way parents these days are letting their daughters run around like whores. Hell I've been to parties in LA where most of the people were in their late 20's but there were girls there probably 17-18, drunk, blowin lines, out at 3 and 4 in the morning.
Should someone get the death penalty for scroggin one of these little whores? hell no.
15 and under... yah that should have serious consequences.
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:22 pm
by The Kizzy
Tikker wrote:why restrict to people who rape/sodomize/molest kids under 14?
should just be anyone who does it to anyone
/agree
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:53 pm
by Adivina
A step in the right direction! I agree though, something needs to be done about rapists in general as well.
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 4:23 pm
by 10sun
This should not apply to cases where the perpetrator is under the age of 18.
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 6:20 pm
by KaiineTN
I don't think they'd give the death penalty to anyone under 18, unless it was some crazy school shooting crap that was well planned and they were very close to 18~
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 7:26 pm
by Martrae
Occasionally, they will charge a kid as an adult...it's pretty rare though.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:57 am
by Minrott
Disagree Tikker. Too many women are raving cunt liars to be giving them the power to make baseless accusations that carry the weight of death for something society automatically gives them the benefit of the doubt for.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 10:15 am
by Harrison
Minrott wrote:Disagree Tikker. Too many women are raving cunt liars to be giving them the power to make baseless accusations that carry the weight of death for something society automatically gives them the benefit of the doubt for.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 2:34 pm
by Yamori
Minrott wrote:Disagree Tikker. Too many women are raving cunt liars to be giving them the power to make baseless accusations that carry the weight of death for something society automatically gives them the benefit of the doubt for.
I have to agree with this. Horrible as rape/molestation are - this is intensely abusable by women - and even children - who have an agenda or a grudge. Don't think it wouldn't happen: because it does and will. Cases are often reduced to one person's word against another - and a single person's word should not have the power of death over another.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 2:38 pm
by The Kizzy
Harrison wrote:Minrott wrote:Disagree Tikker. Too many women are raving cunt liars to be giving them the power to make baseless accusations that carry the weight of death for something society automatically gives them the benefit of the doubt for.
Someone watched too much Law and Order
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 2:45 pm
by Thon
Special Victims Unit
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 3:54 pm
by brinstar
Yamori wrote:Minrott wrote:Disagree Tikker. Too many women are raving cunt liars to be giving them the power to make baseless accusations that carry the weight of death for something society automatically gives them the benefit of the doubt for.
I have to agree with this. Horrible as rape/molestation are - this is intensely abusable by women - and even children - who have an agenda or a grudge. Don't think it wouldn't happen: because it does and will. Cases are often reduced to one person's word against another - and a single person's word should not have the power of death over another.
yamori has it right. i've seen it happen myself working in the criminal justice sector.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 4:54 pm
by Darcler
Minrott wrote:Disagree Tikker. Too many women are raving cunt liars to be giving them the power to make baseless accusations that carry the weight of death for something society automatically gives them the benefit of the doubt for.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 8:03 pm
by Trielelvan
Darcler wrote:Minrott wrote:Disagree Tikker. Too many women are raving cunt liars to be giving them the power to make baseless accusations that carry the weight of death for something society automatically gives them the benefit of the doubt for.
I hear where you're coming from Tikker, but the truth is, especially here in the USA, far too many women cry rape or molestation as a form of vengence, when in actuality, THEY were the ones who initiated the whole mess in the first place, and then regretted it after for whatever reason (or set it up on purpose).
However, where children are concerned, if it is proven beyond a doubt, a simple death penalty is still, IMO, too lenient for those bastards, but it's a good start. Combine it with a full castration (I am all for female clitoral castration as well) and I'll call it good.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 8:39 pm
by Captain Insano
I think the better solution to this problem is to disolve women's right to vote and to go to school.
Dumb and in the kitchen I sez. They cause a lot less trouble this way.
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:23 am
by Darcler
But you can still rape a person even though you are castrated.
You take away the parts but not the compulsion.
Same with chemical castration. You take away the ability to ejaculate (and I think to get a hardon) but not the compulsion.
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:10 am
by Trielelvan
Darcler wrote:But you can still rape a person even though you are castrated.
You take away the parts but not the compulsion.
Same with chemical castration. You take away the ability to ejaculate (and I think to get a hardon) but not the compulsion.
Reading comprehension...
I said
combine it... as in
with the death penalty? Not stand alone. Oh, and I am not talking about wuss chemical castration or just the hairy bean bag.
I am talking physical, jagged razor, no anesthesia, sheared off, no genitals left type castration... you know, effectively turning any male instantly into a full blown eunuch? Yeah, that.
And Ralf, eat me. I will stick that chicken pot pie up your poopchute and force feed you your own jizz boy.
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:48 am
by Minrott
hahahaha. You're spicy.
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 9:53 am
by Darcler
Trielelvan wrote:Darcler wrote:But you can still rape a person even though you are castrated.
You take away the parts but not the compulsion.
Same with chemical castration. You take away the ability to ejaculate (and I think to get a hardon) but not the compulsion.
Reading comprehension...
I said
combine it... as in
with the death penalty?
Yeah sorry. I didnt catch that the first time reading it. My bad.
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:05 am
by Narrock
Trielelvan wrote:
And Ralf, eat me
.
Wouldn't your boyfriend get jealous?
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:24 pm
by Adivina
Trielelvan wrote:Darcler wrote:But you can still rape a person even though you are castrated.
You take away the parts but not the compulsion.
Same with chemical castration. You take away the ability to ejaculate (and I think to get a hardon) but not the compulsion.
Reading comprehension...
I said
combine it... as in
with the death penalty? Not stand alone. Oh, and I am not talking about wuss chemical castration or just the hairy bean bag.
I am talking physical, jagged razor, no anesthesia, sheared off, no genitals left type castration... you know, effectively turning any male instantly into a full blown eunuch? Yeah, that.
And Ralf, eat me. I will stick that chicken pot pie up your poopchute and force feed you your own jizz boy.
The problem with this Trie is that many scientists have proven that for a good number of child molestors, the molestation is not sexual in nature for them, it is more of a power trip. So rather than molesting with a sexual organ, those people would just move on to other objects.
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 2:53 pm
by Naethyn
A man convicted of rape in roman times would simply get his scrotum crushed between two rocks.
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:53 pm
by Trielelvan
Narrock wrote:Wouldn't your boyfriend get jealous?
yeah, probably so if I had a boyfriend
Adivina wrote:the molestation is not sexual in nature for them, it is more of a power trip
I know, but again, I'm not talking
in lieu of the death penalty.
I am saying to
supplement the death sentence
with it. The sole purpose of the castration is torture, pure and simple.
No one who rapes/molests children is deserving of as easy a death as we provide to criminals in this country.