Page 1 of 1
Catholics were just as bad as Muslims
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:27 am
by Jay
Hello.
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:29 am
by Darcler
Slow day at work?
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:38 am
by Tikker
you're about to be moderated for telling the truth, hide
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:14 pm
by Lionking
Tikker wrote:you're about to be moderated for telling the truth, hide
I don't think Lyion is the Moderator here!

Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:20 pm
by Gidan
Technically the admins are moderators everywhere

In general though, we leave it to Ganzo to mod this forum how he pleases.
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:28 pm
by Tikker
Lionking wrote:Tikker wrote:you're about to be moderated for telling the truth, hide
I don't think Lyion is the Moderator here!

technically lyion isn't a moderator of any forum
he just has admin priviledges which equate to being able to delete posts he disagrees with and call it moderation
Re: Catholics were just as bad as Muslims
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:26 am
by Narrock
Jay wrote:Hello.
Troll. I lol'd anyway though. :P
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:13 pm
by Lueyen
I'd argue in some aspects they were worse. During the crusades the vast majority of catholics were not only supportive, but thought of the crusades of something along the lines of a heroic adventure, and I don't believe that in the Muslim community there is the same level of support for terroisim.
That being said.. really what difference does it make? The catholics now are not the catholics of old, the Catholic Church now is not the same as it was in medieval times. People speak out in condemnation of the perversion of Islam, and the actions of radical fanatics with twisted views because it's wrong in the here and now.
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:52 pm
by Tikker
Lueyen wrote:
That being said.. really what difference does it make? The catholics now are not the catholics of old, the Catholic Church now is not the same as it was in medieval times. People speak out in condemnation of the perversion of Islam, and the actions of radical fanatics with twisted views because it's wrong in the here and now.
it was wrong back then too~
it's more the hypocrasy of certain folks who put forth the evilness of 1 religion for certain acts, when their own religion has a history of doing the exact same
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:51 am
by Yamori
At least Catholics from the dark ages have the excuse of living in a time period where there was extremely little access to books and no real means of long distance communication.
The fact that contemporary fundamentalist Islamic culture exists in a world with television, radio, the internet, libraries, ect is what makes it so disturbing.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:07 pm
by Ganzo
Gidan wrote:Technically the admins are moderators everywhere

In general though, we leave it to Ganzo to mod this forum how he pleases.
I only delete topics that offend Judaism
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:43 pm
by Diekan
Damn Jews. Stop charging so much for everything.
Or I'll send Mel after you.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:37 pm
by Lionking
OK, so Muslims think they have a shot at 'paradise' but are going to end up burning in hell. Catholics think they have to suffer in 'purgatory' before having a shot at heaven but they are also going to burn in hell. So, what's the difference?

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:32 pm
by Markarado
The fact that contemporary fundamentalist Islamic culture exists in a world with television, radio, the internet, libraries, ect is what makes it so disturbing.
It could easily be argued that a large portion of these people don't exist in a world with television, radio, the internet, libraries, etc...
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:35 am
by Thon
am i the only one who thinks the 70 virgin harem seems like a better paradise than naptime with jesus?
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:22 am
by Markarado
Except that it doesn't exist. After a few hundred years I can see almost anyone getting bored with the virgins anyways.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 9:15 am
by Tossica
Thon wrote:am i the only one who thinks the 70 virgin harem seems like a better paradise than naptime with jesus?
I don't know man. I'd burn through those virgins in like a week and then all I'd have is a whole bunch of bitches nagging at me for eternity. I'd seriously consider kicking it with Jesus... at least I'd have someone to burn a J with and talk about serious shit instead of which purse matches which shoes and what was on Oprah today.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 9:25 am
by Tikker
Markarado wrote:Except that it doesn't exist. After a few hundred years I can see almost anyone getting bored with the virgins anyways.
muslim heaven is exactly as probable as your christian heaven
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:47 am
by The Kizzy
Did you see that Conan in the year 2000 skit he did with LArry King? SOmething like "The pope apologized after making comments to offend islam, he apologized saying "I'm sorry I acted like a real jew" Larry King could not keep a straight face afterwards, neither could that guy who sings for the skit.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:14 am
by Phlegm
Markarado wrote:Except that it doesn't exist. After a few hundred years I can see almost anyone getting bored with the virgins anyways.
After a few hundred years if there still are virgins left, you are a big fag.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:33 am
by Harrison
I would hope women aren't the only thing I have to look forward to in HEAVEN.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:39 am
by Tossica
Harrison wrote:I would hope women aren't the only thing I have to look forward to in HEAVEN.
No, I'm sure there will be some men there for you Finawin. Jesus loves fags too.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:43 am
by Harrison
I guess it's a good thing there is no heaven or hell.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:06 pm
by Tuggan
is this the same harrison that would run off at the mouth about how stupid people are for thinking they know if there is or isnt a god/devil/heaven/hell?
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 2:08 pm
by Jay
Wow I forgot I'd posted this. Anyways, back in the day Catholics were the terrorists. Only difference is that they had a lot more supporters.