Page 1 of 1

My guild vs naxx video

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:52 pm
by Mudcrush Durtfeet

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 1:39 pm
by ybik gnome
Figured Mudcrush would play ezmode alliance.

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:09 pm
by Gargamellow
[smiley poster=grins]<3 Mudcrush[/smiley]

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:29 pm
by Tuggan
my server must sux, cause horde dominate for the most part :-x

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:05 pm
by mofish
ybik gnome wrote:ezmode alliance.


Horde cries cries cries. Why do you guys cry so much?

Ive got some horde alts on a pvp server. And its the same thing there, ezmode this ezmode that alliance whaahh cry cry cry :cry:

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:33 pm
by Tikker
play both to 60 and you'll understand

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:37 pm
by Biph_Dawgy
Hey mudcrush you play on cenarius, i had acouple of mid level characters there, was apart of Pirate before they started raiding real hard.

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:02 pm
by Harrison
mofish wrote:
ybik gnome wrote:ezmode alliance.


Horde cries cries cries. Why do you guys cry so much?

Ive got some horde alts on a pvp server. And its the same thing there, ezmode this ezmode that alliance whaahh cry cry cry :cry:


It's probably more balanced out now but, it used to be hugely disproportionate content-wise.

Horde side felt "half done" throughout the progression of leveling.

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 10:05 pm
by Mop
it still does, tho with expansion all the horde crying bout pali's can stop.

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 10:08 pm
by Gargamellow
If I ever played WoW..I would want to be evil. IS that what Horde is? Evil races?

Ya...I would.

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 10:16 pm
by Darcler
No.

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 10:22 pm
by Gargamellow
hmm well I don't klnow then. If I can't be evil..then fuck it.

warcraft 3 is much funner anyway...at least my minions actually listen instead of dicking around organizing their bags or chatting with the latest cyberslut

I could be done with online gaming.

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:36 am
by Zanchief
Horde isn't evil. Horde is like the free thinking liberals and alliance is like the fear mongering imperialist republicans.

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:12 am
by ybik gnome
Tikker wrote:play both to 60 and you'll understand


Correct.

Dont mean to pinch nerves here, since apparently Im crying, but some classes make a huge difference.

Id post a huge drawn out number crunch on how 4 paladins do more for the raid, and how it would need 8+ shamans to 1/2 of what they could. I will say though once horde gets paladin, I think the PVE edge will tip due to tauren now being a semi better tank, esp with orcs racial being nerfed a bit.

Guild has recently done some rebuilding so were going back through MC with alts and shit, and oh how I miss fear ward for the lazy ass tanks who dont want to stance dance.

If your referring to AV, for Pvp, and horde is winning, you have some shitty ass alliance players. We have people in our BG group now, dont even cap FW anymore, they just send 40 ppl strong back to our relief hut and take it in 5 minutes. I mean who the fuck designed AV....

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:32 pm
by Burgy99
Horde is as close to evil as you can get Garg :) Atleast theres ogres, undead, trolls, and cow people...

I've never played an alliance character, but my friends that do have alliance alts all tell me theres like hundreds of more quest for them, and the quests are more thought out at that.

And, AV has been nerfed so many times its no longer fun. It's not even PVP anymore, its a PVE race to the opposing factions boss mob. They were awesome when they were still 15 hour epic battles that you stayed in to see who wins just out of principle.

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:08 pm
by Mudcrush Durtfeet
I've played horde to 58, I saw pretty much as many quests for them as for alliance. They tend to get better rewards too.

The 'horde side is less developed' thing is a myth from beta, when they WERE unfinshed etc etc. Right now nothing could be further from the case.

Horde (at least while leveling) have a MUCH better flight point network and zepp placement beats crap out of boat placement.

Raiding wise, well, yes. Pallys > shaman. /comfort

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:10 am
by Zanchief
Mudcrush Durtfeet wrote:I've played horde to 58, I saw pretty much as many quests for them as for alliance. They tend to get better rewards too.

The 'horde side is less developed' thing is a myth from beta, when they WERE unfinshed etc etc. Right now nothing could be further from the case.

Horde (at least while leveling) have a MUCH better flight point network and zepp placement beats crap out of boat placement.

Raiding wise, well, yes. Pallys > shaman. /comfort


Now that's true but the game was live for about a year and a half before they added the extra horde FP to balance it out.

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 11:22 pm
by KaiineTN
I leveled a druid to 60 on Horde and had an easier time and more fun in the process than when leveling my rogue to 60 on Alliance. /shrug

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:07 am
by 10sun
KaiineTN wrote:I leveled a druid to 60 on Horde and had an easier time and more fun in the process than when leveling my rogue to 60 on Alliance. /shrug


Thats because druids are EZ mode OMG!

-Adam

ps. try leveling up a warrior on both sides. I'd imagine that horde warriors have it easier to be quite honest.

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:16 am
by ybik gnome
Undead warriors rock on downtime...Cannablism + most humanoids earlier on for horde side(least undead) which rocks for bandages/pure cash drops.

Hell an undead lock is quite a ez lvl up, grinding on humanoids.

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:00 am
by Menlaan
I'm a relative newbie to WoW and have effortlessly leveled my undead shadow priest to 42 so far while playing VERY casually (though I'm usually rested which makes xp incredible when I do play). I've mostly solo-quested, but I've done a fair number of elite quests and instance runs with PUGs. I like the undead quests I've done, though I'm having a good time in Stranglethorn now.

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:01 am
by Tikker
who has a more interesting raiding role, druid, or shaman?

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:37 am
by Arlos
As I understand it, both of them have pretty much the same raid role as the paladin: Healbot, with occasional slight modifications. Druids, you get to ennervate people. Shamen, you drop totems as they expire. Paladins, we cleanse a lot.

That's pretty much it...

-Arlos

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:08 pm
by KaiineTN
I'd drop my rogue in an instant and never look back if I could play a feral druid in a raiding guild.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:12 am
by ybik gnome
Since we've backed out of nax(only downed anub so far), due to the expansion coming out and not wanting to spend 50+ gold a night on repair bills, we've let a majority of the guild respec. We still run the lower dungeons, although not as efficently.

Have some feral druids who tank, and actually tank better then some warriors.
Had 3 shadow priest + shaman in MT group on onyxia, and didnt even need to throw out heals with all the Vampiric embrace going around.