namelesstavern.net

Mindia, this is taken from the Rudy Wiki:

<i>Giuliani is a Roman Catholic who is pro-choice, favors same-sex civil unions, gun control, and embryonic stem-cell research. Pro-life groups, such as the Republican National Coalition for Life, have already announced their intention to oppose Giuliani or any other pro-choice candidate,[43] though evidence suggests that even among these voters, he enjoys some support.</i>

1. You hate Catholics
2. You are Pro-Life
3. You are against same-sex civil unions
4. I - believe - you are against gun control
5. You are against embryo stem-cell research

Yet this is your choice for 2008? How do you justify the hypocrisy?

Actually, to be fair to Mindia, he has actually said he's in favor of gay civil unions, as I recall, or at least not rabidly opposed to them. What he's adamantly opposed to is calling such a union Marriage.

-Arlos

I don't hate Catholics.
I am pro life.
I'm pro same-sex unions.
I'm all for gun rights.
I'm against embryonic stem cell research.
and I like Rudi Giuliani.

I am by far in favor of Republican, however i would not be apposed to Guiliani winning the election.

Xaiveir wrote:I am by far in favor of Republican, however i would not be apposed to Guiliani winning the election.

I don't understand why people vote based on party, instead of individuals who are running

because it's far far easier and requires much less actual thought

Tikker wrote:

Xaiveir wrote:I am by far in favor of Republican, however i would not be apposed to Guiliani winning the election.

I don't understand why people vote based on party, instead of individuals who are running

Guiliani will likely run under a Republican ticket, however in quite a few areas his stances are not that of the Republican platform... so in essence people would be voting for the cantidate and not the party.

I dont vote based on their party affiliation at all. I look at the issues, and their stances. I could care less if they are republican, democrat or indipendant. Recently i have not seen a Republican that i agreed with their agenda, Guillini i think would change that.

Xaiveir wrote:I am by far in favor of Republican, however i would not be apposed to Guiliani winning the election.

I've now read this 3 times, and I have no idea what you're trying to say

Menlaan wrote:

Xaiveir wrote:I am by far in favor of Republican, however i would not be apposed to Guiliani winning the election.

I've now read this 3 times, and I have no idea what you're trying to say

lol me too

my guess is that he means he would rather have a more traditional republican, but despite rudy's untraditional stances he would still be a good candidate.