Page 1 of 1
Oops
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:09 am
by Lyion
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:58 pm
by Dimuza
too bad for him....that sucks to have it all end like that.
but, on the other hand, no mroe talk about T.O., so uh...yeah, baby
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:26 pm
by Phlegm
Don't bet on not hearing about TO this off season. That fucker always manage to stay in the news regardless.
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:05 pm
by Dimuza
I found myself feeling very happy every important game that came along where T.O. was either a non-factor or if they happened to throw to him - he dropped it. I probably felt a little too happy....that guy just irritates me

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:25 pm
by Arlos
I always love to see random bad stuff like this happen to the Cowpatties. Couldn't happen to a nicer team.
-Arlos
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:10 am
by brinstar
also i like that the eagles are doing fine without him
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 7:55 am
by Tikker
You mean, the Eagles led by Jeff Garcia, the first QB he fucked over
I can just imagine after the game that Garcia lead a chant of FUCK T.O. FUCK T.O. FUCK T.O.
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:12 am
by Xaiveir
Was quite the game! I feel bad for Romo, he came into a very tough situation in Dallas, and played well. Deffinatly one of the more memorable games i have ever seen. On to Chicago, beat the Bears!
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:09 pm
by Evermore
fuck dallas. and i bet Turd Owens will be traded/cut very soon.
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:13 pm
by Phlegm
Evermore wrote:fuck dallas. and i bet Turd Owens will be traded/cut very soon.
I think it may come down to either Owens or Parcells. One of them will be gone by next year.
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:15 pm
by Phlegm
Xaiveir wrote:Was quite the game! I feel bad for Romo, he came into a very tough situation in Dallas, and played well. Deffinatly one of the more memorable games i have ever seen. On to Chicago, beat the Bears!
Everyone were saying how great Romo was after the first 4 games or so. Then he sucked ass after that.
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:20 pm
by Xaiveir
Phlegm wrote:Xaiveir wrote:Was quite the game! I feel bad for Romo, he came into a very tough situation in Dallas, and played well. Deffinatly one of the more memorable games i have ever seen. On to Chicago, beat the Bears!
Everyone were saying how great Romo was after the first 4 games or so. Then he sucked ass after that.
The reason is, nobody had film on him. Once some film of him was available, teams were able to better prepare for him. Now its up to him to make adjustments coming into next year. I think he has enough talent to win in the NFL. Plus i cant put all the blame on him for the last few games of the season. The Defense of the Cowboys placed him into spots where he had to become one demensional, and TO had SO many drops that were catchable balls. Thats tough for me to say since i absolutly HATE the Cowboys, im a long time 49er fan.
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:40 pm
by Phlegm
Owens dropping passes or not, Romo should have done a lot better against that patchwork Seahawks secondary.
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:50 pm
by Xaiveir
Phlegm wrote:Owens dropping passes or not, Romo should have done a lot better against that patchwork Seahawks secondary.
By that rationale, LJ should have torn apart the colts.....
Romo didnt do "bad". He did what he was coached to do, take what the defense gives you. The Seahawks game plan was very good, and very simple. If you watch the game tape, the Seahawks didnt "blitz" very much, and when they did, they used zone blitzes and overload blitzes. TO was essenctially single covered when the seahawks blitzed, but they used an overload blitz on the side that TO was on. In doing this Romo was always forced out of the pocket, away from the single coverage, and was throwing into a zone coverage with 3-4 defensive players all night long.
The zone blitzes, wich really isnt that much of a "blitz" really because you are still rushing only 4 people. Winstrom, from his DE position would drop back into coverage, while tatupu would then rush from his linebacker spot. Result being still only 4 people rushing the quarterback, but just not a traditional rush with your 4 down lineman.
It was the inability of the cowboys offensive line to protect Romo, and their inability to run the ball effectively that was the downfall of the Cowboys, not necessarily Romo. When you have recievers that are dropping passes (To i think dropped 3 during the game, Glen dropped 2 "on target passes") that is a drive killer. The Seahawks forced the Cowboys into 3 and long situations all night long.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:08 pm
by Phlegm
Romo would had score or at least get the first down if he just took off right away instead of hesitating.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:13 pm
by Tikker
Phlegm wrote:Romo would had score or at least get the first down if he just took off right away instead of hesitating.
Lyion and I were bullshitting on IM while the game was on
If the cowboys had kept Vanderjagt(big guy for a kicker) instead of pint sized torador Gramatica, the kicker would have blocked the guy (#27) and romo would have scored
watch the replay, if gramatica had just fallen at the guys feet and slowed him down Romo scores
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:17 pm
by Alphonso
when its all said and done does it really matter what nfc team this year goes to the superbowl?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:18 pm
by Phlegm
Alphonso wrote:when its all said and done does it really matter what nfc team this year goes to the superbowl?
Chicago goes or Jay is going to cry.
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 4:56 pm
by Kaemon
Phlegm wrote:Evermore wrote:fuck dallas. and i bet Turd Owens will be traded/cut very soon.
I think it may come down to either Owens or Parcells. One of them will be gone by next year.
Parcells signed a 1 year extention, sooooooo.....
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:19 pm
by Phlegm
Kaemon wrote:Phlegm wrote:Evermore wrote:fuck dallas. and i bet Turd Owens will be traded/cut very soon.
I think it may come down to either Owens or Parcells. One of them will be gone by next year.
Parcells signed a 1 year extention, sooooooo.....
Are you sure it was Parcells? The only coach that got a 1 year extension today is Coughlin with the Giants.
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:35 pm
by Xaiveir
Parcells was under contract already for next year.....