Page 1 of 1

NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:35 pm
by Tikker
rofl @ bears

rofl @ baltimore

wtf is up with green bay? they haven't really beaten a really good team yet (not sure if eagles are really good anymore)

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:39 pm
by Diekan
rofl @Miami

isn't that ouchyfishead's team?

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:47 pm
by Tikker
miami wasn't supposed to be good tho ;)

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:52 pm
by Arlos
49ers are looking flat-out awful today. I mean just wretched. Ugh.


If San Diego loses to the Chargers, does the Norv firing death watch officially begin?

-Arlos

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 6:04 pm
by Tikker
I'd be really impressed if the chargers could beat san diego

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 6:45 pm
by Arlos
OOps. heh. I meant the Raiders.

-Arlos

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 6:52 pm
by Tikker
they really look like they're missing Marty and Wade Phillips

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:50 pm
by Lyion
Mcnabb is getting beat down by the Giants tonight.

San Fran looked awful against Seattle.

Pitt really missed Hines Ward, but Arizona outcoached them in that game.

Guess Rex wasn't the problem in Chicago. They looked even worse with Griese and his rubber band arm in there.

Spanos should fire AJ Smith today. He screwed up a playoff calibre team.

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:57 pm
by Tikker
I didn't get to see the game, but from the play by play, it seemed like arizona did a really good job of stuffing the run

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:20 pm
by Lyion
Arizona had 9 in the box and dared Roethlisberger to beat them. He made one killer throw, and that was pretty much it for their O, until late in the 4th.

I watched the game, it was a fun, physical game. However, Pitt played not to lose versus being aggressive. That usually works for them but today it backfired.

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:28 pm
by Ouchyfish
Diekan wrote:rofl @Miami

isn't that ouchyfishead's team?


I think it's time to sell the team to someone that can take care of it. It's like the pet owner that leaves their dog tied to a tree on a 2 foot rope with no water or food.

Maybe they can bribe Jimmy Johnson into coming back...
:dunno:

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:33 am
by Lionking

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:48 am
by Lyion
What's scary is Chicago's D with their second and third stringers in the secondary, and without a real QB or RB still can almost win games for them.

Chicago could've gotten Jon Kitna two years ago when nobody wanted him, after his stellar season at Cinci. Or Brady Quinn. or a number of other guys. It won't matter until they get better WRs. Mohammed is washed up and Berrian is completely unreliable.

What a complete bummer for Cadillac Williams. I really hated to see the replays of his injury. It made me wince...

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:18 am
by Tacks
lyion wrote:Arizona had 9 in the box and dared Roethlisberger to beat them. He made one killer throw, and that was pretty much it for their O, until late in the 4th.

I watched the game, it was a fun, physical game. However, Pitt played not to lose versus being aggressive. That usually works for them but today it backfired.


And once again Big Ben's line had him running all over the place.

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:44 am
by Evermore
eagles have seemingly taken a shit in their wheaties. they had some n00b LT in and mcnabb got sacked 12 times and they didnt really do anything about it...

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:01 am
by Lyion
Tacks wrote:
lyion wrote:Arizona had 9 in the box and dared Roethlisberger to beat them. He made one killer throw, and that was pretty much it for their O, until late in the 4th.

I watched the game, it was a fun, physical game. However, Pitt played not to lose versus being aggressive. That usually works for them but today it backfired.


And once again Big Ben's line had him running all over the place.


No they didn't. This is the NFL. Everyone gets pressure. Well, everyone sans the VCR laden Patriots.

You seem to <mistakenly> think Pitt has a bad O Line. This is not the case. Care to compare Roethlisberger's pressure with McNabbs last night, if you watched both games?

The reason Pitt lost last night wasn't due to pressure, it was because their best WR was out and the fact they were outcoached. Roethlisberger had a pretty damn clean jersey for a guy getting a lot of heat.

I have no idea what the hell was going on with Philly last night. I guess Coughlin recognized McNabb is still a bit gimpy and decided to blitzkrieg him. Seems that was a good plan.

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:31 am
by Tacks
lyion wrote: it was because their best WR was out



lol wut?

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:36 am
by Evermore
lyion wrote:I have no idea what the hell was going on with Philly last night. I guess Coughlin recognized McNabb is still a bit gimpy and decided to blitzkrieg him. Seems that was a good plan.



That and Tra Thomas is injured. William James was his replacement and could not handle the position. So McNabb spent 3/4 of the game looking at all the pretty stars

Re: NFL week 4

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:49 am
by Tikker
Tacks wrote:
lyion wrote: it was because their best WR was out



lol wut?


Ward is one of the better possession receivers in the league, and is by FAR the best blocking WR in the league