Page 1 of 2
USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:14 pm
by leah
that is all. :D
when my home team is losing (FUCK nebraska's defense SUCKS!!), it's nice to take comfort in the fact that an unranked team can take down JOHN DAVID BOOTY & co. gosh i hate that guy's name.
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 10:32 pm
by Diekan
Yes, yes!!!!
ROFL @ USC!!!
Notre Dame didn't lose, but they suck so bad this year it doesn't really matter now....
Our D sucks because Callahan is moron who should have been FIRED 3 years ago. The D doesn't tackle. They just throw their bodies at the receivers/backs and hope that knocks them down.
Why they wont fire that piss poor excuse for a coach is beyond me. I think in the past 5 years he's averaged roughly 6 wins per season... any other school would have fired his ass after year TWO.
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:13 pm
by leah
i am so disgusted with the outcome of tonight's game that i don't even know what to say.
tbqh, i was actually a little surprised at mizzou that they didn't pull their starters earlier, b/c for christ's sake, it's not like we were going to win.
i appreciate what callahan's been trying to do with our offense and everything, and i really think that keller's been doing a decent job, but GODDAMN we just suck and it's time to recognize that. maybe being knocked out of the top 25 will light a fire under our asses.
at least, i really hope so, because i have tix to next week's game vs. OSU, and i don't really want to watch us take it up the ass :\
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:54 pm
by brinstar
we're not a football school anymore
we're a volleyball school
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:35 am
by Harrison
brinstar wrote:we're not a football school anymore
we're a volleyball school
This promotes boobs. Promoting boobs is good.
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 6:12 am
by Reynaldo
Big 12 blows this year. OU is the only decent team.
LSU vs. South Florida for the national championship np.
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 8:07 am
by Kramer
The NCAA Football season so far has been a giant clusterfuck concerning the Ranking system (A.P. Top 25, etc) I mean it is seriously jacked, it doesn't seem like the top 15 have been so open to getting their asses handed to them by unranked teams...
oh and .... Volleyball is a very happy thing to promote...

Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:36 am
by Ouchyfish
Alabama squeaked by Houston and Auburn destroyed Vanderbilt by 4 touchdowns (unlike Bama beating them by 2.)
Florida almost beat the number one team and you know who just beat Florida...
Auburn 38, Alabama 10<---2007 Iron Bowl Prediction
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:35 pm
by brinstar
we'll let you know when the iron bowl matters
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 6:25 pm
by Ouchyfish
brinstar wrote:we'll let you know when the iron bowl matters
I'll let you know when nebraska matters...well...your grandkids maybe.
brinstar wrote:we're not a football school anymore
we're a volleyball school
You said it best.
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:35 pm
by Diekan
That will change when Callahan is gone, which can't happen soon enough.
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:52 pm
by brinstar
Ouchyfish wrote:brinstar wrote:we'll let you know when the iron bowl matters
I'll let you know when nebraska matters...well...your grandkids maybe.
swing and a miss. you must've missed the part about me not giving two shits about nebraska football

anyway, enjoy your iron bowl, the rest of the country has better things to do
like laundry
or crossword puzzles
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:54 pm
by Ouchyfish
Swing and a miss for you as well then. The ratings say otherwise.
And for someone who doesn't give two shits you sure whine like a bitch about them enough to potentially prove otherwise.
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:59 pm
by Tacks
rofl, what?
What's the iron bowl
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:07 pm
by brinstar
Ouchyfish wrote:Swing and a miss for you as well then. The ratings say otherwise.
And for someone who doesn't give two shits you sure whine like a bitch about them enough to potentially prove otherwise.
haha what the fuck, i don't whine about the huskers, i try to stifle laughter about them
and tacks, the iron bowl is some lameass backwoods hick game that no one outside of alabama cares about
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:41 pm
by Tacks
I know what it is, I was just playing along.
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:49 pm
by brinstar
i know you know what it is
i was just spiking your set
because we are a volleyball school

Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am
by Lyion
Man, Florida ALMOST beat LSU. That would've given OSU a good shot at #1 and the yokels here would've rejoiced.
College football SO needs a playoff system.
F the BCS.
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:59 am
by Ouchyfish
lyion wrote:Man, Florida ALMOST beat LSU. That would've given OSU a good shot at #1 and the yokels here would've rejoiced.
College football SO needs a playoff system.
F the BCS.
Amen..and think of all the crazy retarded money they could make off of more games! (Since that's the only way to get their attention with new ideas.)
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:43 am
by Arlos
They don't do it, because that'd kinda render the overall bowl system kinda useless, and they want to rake in all those advertising dollars from the "Corporation X Bowl!" x100.
Of course, they claim it's "FOR THE CHILDREN", er, "FOR THE ATHLETES!" cause they claim a playoff system would be an onerous burden to the "student"-athletes. Of course, all lower divisions of NCAA football have a playoff system, and it doesn't seem to be too much of a burden on THOSE players, so that explanation kinda pegs the BS-O-Meter.
-Arlos
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:55 am
by Ouchyfish
Couldn't the corporation bowls host the major playoff matchups towards the end?
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:07 pm
by Arlos
Yeah, but playoffs would be based on the top 8 teams, as there's no way in bloody hell you could do something like March Madness for football.
So, you go from what, 50+ bowls to 8? I am sure they could still hold other "bowl" games, but with the diversion of interest onto the playoff bowls, I doubt the NCAA could squeeze anywhere near as much money from the corporations for them.
-Arlos
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:10 pm
by Tikker
Arlos wrote:Yeah, but playoffs would be based on the top 8 teams, as there's no way in bloody hell you could do something like March Madness for football.
why not?
go back to last years national game
how long between their last game and that game? it was something retarded like 50+ days wasn't it?
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:53 pm
by Ouchyfish
Tikker wrote:Arlos wrote:Yeah, but playoffs would be based on the top 8 teams, as there's no way in bloody hell you could do something like March Madness for football.
why not?
go back to last years national game
how long between their last game and that game? it was something retarded like 50+ days wasn't it?
Exactly. Just use the lesser bowls to handle the lesser matchups in the playoff. Also, why just the top 8? Let's do Top 24! Set up seeds and lowest seeded can start with 3 Bowls on Saturday, maybe two or three during the week at night. I just eliminated 6 teams making it possible to have the whole shindig over with in 3-4 weeks, which is about what the damn post season amounts to now anyways. Some kinks need to be worked out about who platys who first, later, etc, but it could be done. Or fuck it, copy what AA does.
The lesser bowls go first, the bigger ones go later, alternating National Champ game like they do now.
Re: USC = LOSERS
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:26 pm
by Tacks
Go ahead and convince the sponsers that their bowl should be the "lesser bowl".