Page 1 of 2

Because of Ann Coulter

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:38 pm
by Narrock
saying that all Jews should convert to Christianity... I've removed my sig.



edit: p.s. thanks Arlos ;)

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:49 pm
by Ouchyfish
Isn't that what every good Christian should think? "Let's convert the whole world!!!!!" "Praise JESUS!!!!!!"

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:51 pm
by Narrock
Ouchyfish wrote:Isn't that what every good Christian should think? "Let's convert the whole world!!!!!" "Praise JESUS!!!!!!"


I have too much respect for Judaism to do that, and besides... if Christians really did think that way then they wouldn't be any better than terrorists trying to convert everybody to Islam.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:00 pm
by Zanchief
Narrock wrote:saying that all Jews should convert to Christianity... I've removed my sig.


Good on you Mindia. Just for that I'm not going to say one bad thing about Christianity for an entire week.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:02 pm
by araby
she has definitely helped herself to a hefty portion of her own words.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:24 pm
by Tikker
Narrock wrote:
Ouchyfish wrote:Isn't that what every good Christian should think? "Let's convert the whole world!!!!!" "Praise JESUS!!!!!!"


I have too much respect for Judaism to do that, and besides... if Christians really did think that way then they wouldn't be any better than terrorists trying to convert everybody to Islam.



well that, and Jesus was a jew

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:16 am
by Jay
...that was killed by Jews.

Sugartits.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:18 am
by Tikker
Jay wrote:...that was killed by Jews.

Sugartits.



no, it was the romans who killed jesus

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:23 am
by araby
Tikker wrote:
Jay wrote:...that was killed by Jews.

Sugartits.



no, it was the romans who killed jesus


I thought he got hung up at a stones concert.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:23 pm
by Yamori
I don't get why saying that Jesus is the only way to avoid eternal hellfire is ok but saying that jews should all convert isn't. :dunno:

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:39 pm
by Ouchyfish
It's all in the way you hold your head while you beat your bible.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 4:06 pm
by Kramer
i am convinced that only men watch ann coulter and only because they hope that one day the pretty blonde chick who talks about politics will show her tits....

that is the ONLY reason i can imagine people pay any attention to her...

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 4:15 pm
by Harrison
Tikker wrote:
Jay wrote:...that was killed by Jews.

Sugartits.



no, it was the romans who killed jesus


Semantics...

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 4:16 pm
by Tikker
Kramer wrote:i am convinced that only men watch ann coulter and only because they hope that one day the pretty blonde chick who talks about politics will show her tits....

that is the ONLY reason i can imagine people pay any attention to her...



with the amount of stupid shit she says, I'm convinced she's a NT regular

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:25 pm
by Trielelvan
Narrock wrote:saying that all Jews should convert to Christianity... I've removed my sig.

I'm so glad a light was finally shone bright enough to be a beacon of logic to draw you away from that psycho harlot.
:angel3:

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:04 pm
by Lueyen
DEUTSCH: Let me ask you a question. We're going to get off strengths and weakness for a second. If you had your way, and all of your — forget that any of them —

COULTER: I like this.

DEUTSCH: — are calculated marketing teases, and your dreams, which are genuine, came true having to do with immigration, having to do with women's — with abortion — what would this country look like?

COULTER: UMMMMM (pause) ... It would look like New York City during the Republican National Convention. In fact, that's what I think heaven is going to look like.

DEUTSCH: And what did that look like?

COULTER: Happy, joyful Republicans in the greatest city in the world.

DEUTSCH: No, no, no, no, but I'm talking about this country. You don't want to make this country — it's not about Republicans. I'm saying, what would the fabric of this country look like? Forget that the Republicans would be running the show.

COULTER: Well, everyone would root for America, the Democratic Party would look like Joe Lieberman, the Republican Party would look like Duncan Hunter —

DEUTSCH: No, no, no, I don't want — I'm not talking about politically the landscape. What would our — would we be safer? Would people be happier? Would they be more —

COULTER: We would be a lot safer.

DEUTSCH: Would there be more tolerance? Would there be — would women be happier, would the races get along better? The Ann Coulter subscription — prescription. What — tell me what would be different in our fabric of country, because —

COULTER: Well, all of those things.

DEUTSCH: I can give — I can give you an argument there would be more divisiveness, that there would be more hate —

COULTER: Oh, no.

DEUTSCH: That there would be a bigger difference between the rich and the poor, a lot of other — tell me what — why this would be a better world? Let's give you — I'm going to give you — say this is your show.

COULTER: Well, OK, take the Republican National Convention. People were happy. They're Christian. They're tolerant. They defend America, they —

DEUTSCH: Christian — so we should be Christian? It would be better if we were all Christian?

COULTER: Yes.

DEUTSCH: We should all be Christian?

COULTER: Yes. Would you like to come to church with me, Donny?

DEUTSCH: So I should not be a Jew, I should be a Christian, and this would be a better place?

COULTER: Well, you could be a practicing Jew, but you're not.

DEUTSCH: I actually am. That's not true. I really am. But — so we would be better if we were — if people — if there were no Jews, no Buddhists —

COULTER: Whenever I'm harangued by —

DEUTSCH: — in this country? You can't believe that.

COULTER: — you know, liberals on diversity —

DEUTSCH: Here you go again.

COULTER: No, it's true. I give all of these speeches at megachurches across America, and the one thing that's really striking about it is how utterly, completely diverse they are, and completely unself-consciously. You walk past a mixed-race couple in New York, and it's like they have a chip on their shoulder. They're just waiting for somebody to say something, as if anybody would. And —

DEUTSCH: I don't agree with that. I don't agree with that at all. Maybe you have the chip looking at them. I see a lot of interracial couples, and I don't see any more or less chips there either way. That's erroneous.

COULTER: No. In fact, there was an entire "Seinfeld" episode about Elaine and her boyfriend dating because they wanted to be a mixed-race couple, so you're lying.

DEUTSCH: Oh, because of some "Seinfeld" episode? OK.

COULTER: But yeah, I think that's reflective of what's going on in the culture, but it is completely striking that at these huge megachurches — the idea that, you know, the more Christian you are, the less tolerant you would be is preposterous.

DEUTSCH: That isn't what I said, but you said I should not — we should just throw Judaism away and we should all be Christians, then, or —

COULTER: Yeah.

DEUTSCH: Really?

COULTER: Well, it's a lot easier. It's kind of a fast track.

DEUTSCH: Really?

COULTER: Yeah. You have to obey.

DEUTSCH: You can't possibly believe that.

COULTER: Yes.

DEUTSCH: You can't possibly — you're too educated, you can't — you're like my friend in —

COULTER: Do you know what Christianity is? We believe your religion, but you have to obey.

DEUTSCH: No, no, no, but I mean —

COULTER: We have the fast-track program.

DEUTSCH: Why don't I put you with the head of Iran? I mean, come on. You can't believe that.

COULTER: The head of Iran is not a Christian.

DEUTSCH: No, but in fact, "Let's wipe Israel" —

COULTER: I don't know if you've been paying attention.

DEUTSCH: "Let's wipe Israel off the earth." I mean, what, no Jews?

COULTER: No, we think — we just want Jews to be perfected, as they say.

DEUTSCH: Wow, you didn't really say that, did you?

COULTER: Yes. That is what Christianity is. We believe the Old Testament, but ours is more like Federal Express. You have to obey laws. We know we're all sinners —

DEUTSCH: In my old days, I would have argued — when you say something absurd like that, there's no —

COULTER: What's absurd?

DEUTSCH: Jews are going to be perfected. I'm going to go off and try to perfect myself —

COULTER: Well, that's what the New Testament says.

DEUTSCH: Ann Coulter, author of "If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans," and if Ann Coulter had any brains, she would not say Jews need to be perfected. I'm offended by that personally. And we'll have more "Big Idea" when we come back.

(BREAK)

DEUTSCH: Welcome back to "The Big Idea." During the break, Ann said she wanted to explain her last comment. So I'm going to give her a chance. So you don't think that was offensive?

COULTER: No. I'm sorry. It is not intended to be. I don't think you should take it that way, but that is what Christians consider themselves: perfected Jews. We believe the Old Testament. As you know from the Old Testament, God was constantly getting fed up with humans for not being able to, you know, live up to all the laws. What Christians believe — this is just a statement of what the New Testament is — is that that's why Christ came and died for our sins. Christians believe the Old Testament. You don't believe our testament.

DEUTSCH: You said — your exact words were, "Jews need to be perfected." Those are the words out of your mouth.

COULTER: No, I'm saying that's what a Christian is.

DEUTSCH: But that's what you said — don't you see how hateful, how anti-Semitic —

COULTER: No!

DEUTSCH: How do you not see? You're an educated woman. How do you not see that?

COULTER: That isn't hateful at all.

DEUTSCH: But that's even a scarier thought. OK —

COULTER: No, no, no, no, no. I don't want you being offended by this. This is what Christians consider themselves, because our testament is the continuation of your testament. You know that. So we think Jews go to heaven. I mean (Jerry) Falwell himself said that, but you have to follow laws. Ours is "Christ died for our sins." We consider ourselves perfected Christians. For me to say that for you to become a Christian is to become a perfected Christian is not offensive at all.

DEUTSCH: We will let the audience decide then, won't we? Ann Coulter. New book. More "Big Idea" straight ahead.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:17 pm
by Arlos
What a bigoted, conceited ho-bag.

What about all the other religions that are constitutionally protected? She forget about those? Or just wants to ignore that little factoid? I'm sure the over 1 billion Hindus in the world would LOVE to thank her for being even lower on the totem pole than Jews that need "perfecting"....

-Arlos

PS. Mindia, my english-pedantry speaking here, but "In lieu of" basically means as a substitution for. (ie, "in lieu of steak, we shall have chicken".) More properly, it should be "As a consequence of..."

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:44 pm
by Lueyen
COULTER: No, we think — we just want Jews to be perfected, as they say.


The "as they say" part is because Coulter didn't coin the term, although I believe she misspoke, I think the actual term was "perfected Jew", not "perfected Christian". Early "Christians" didn't consider themselves Christians, but Jews that believed Christ was the messiah. In modern day with the definitive division of Christianity and Judaism we think about it differently and frankly because the base of Christianity is no longer really Judaism, as it once was.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:10 pm
by Tikker
COULTER: No. In fact, there was an entire "Seinfeld" episode about Elaine and her boyfriend dating because they wanted to be a mixed-race couple, so you're lying.

DEUTSCH: Oh, because of some "Seinfeld" episode? OK.



haha, what dumb fucking cunt

i mean, typical right wing christian

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:18 am
by Yamori
She's just mouthing the rather explicit concepts of christianity. Only one religion gets you into heaven, and that's believin' in jesus and the bible. Jews only believe in half of the bible and don't see jesus as the big guy, and are therefore misguided and religiously imperfect in christian eyes.

Where is the shock coming from? It's not like this is radical. If you're a serious christian, that's what you HAVE to believe. She's just saying it out loud in a mainstream forum instead of silently being snooty about spiritual superiority like most do.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:37 am
by Sithos
Someone please shove a cock in her mouth to shut her up.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:28 am
by Gypsiyee
she's certainly one to talk about tolerance and a chip on someone's shoulder. basing her facts on an episode of seinfeld, what a fucking idiot.

good for you mindia, Im glad you were able to finally shake any respect you had.

Re: In lieu of Ann Coulter

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:51 pm
by Narrock
Gypsiyee wrote:she's certainly one to talk about tolerance and a chip on someone's shoulder. basing her facts on an episode of seinfeld, what a fucking idiot.

good for you mindia, Im glad you were able to finally shake any respect you had.


I do agree with a lot of what she has to say, but these latest comments from AC were even too "over-the-top" for me.

Re: Because of Ann Coulter

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:08 pm
by Eziekial
i don't see it as over the top. She didn't say anything that I would regard as needing to be censored so why all the hate? Aren't we free to express ourselves in this country? :angel4:

Re: Because of Ann Coulter

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:40 pm
by Arlos
Of course she has the right to say whatever she wants (as long as it isn't an incitement to violence or some other equivalent to yelling 'fire' in a crowded theatre).

However, being free to say whatever you wish does NOT mean you are immune to all repercussions of said speech.

-Arlos