namelesstavern.net

Why are there soooooooooooooooooooooo many big girls out there on the dating scene? Why won't they just stop macking down on ice cream, sodas, milkshakes, pizzas and french fries 5x a day? I don't get it. So, 80% of the single women out there have a slow metabolism and/or thyroid problems? Or are they just lazy?

diekan got reincarnated into mindia or..?

and there's fat chicks in the dating scene because there's a reason single people are single.

Gypsiyee wrote:diekan got reincarnated into mindia or..?

and there's fat chicks in the dating scene because there's a reason single people are single.

I'm just seeing more and more fatties out there than ever before. It's getting ridiculous. I'm not talking about 10 or 12 pounds... I'm talking 30 to 50+ pounds overweight. There's no such thing as a "BBW" so I wish that term would just disappear.

you're also closer to being a senior citizen than a teenager now

ps, there's a reason you're still single too

I don't even know what BBW means.

at any rate, turning into a judgmental dickhead and acting like diekan certainly won't score you a chick

as you've seen in past experience, your perfect little cute chicks haven't done you much good.

bbw= big beautiful women

there are honestly guys out there who prefer fat chicks

my ex had a complex where he just thought every man in the universe had the same taste he did.. i find that most stereotypical chauvinist type men think the same thing. not every man wants a teeny waste and huge tits. majority sure, but not all

Some women are happy with the way they look and don't see the need to have to fit into the "male vision" of what a woman should be. What you may think is 40-50 pounds overweight may be considered healthy. I just looked it up on line and it said a person (not a male or female) of my heigth should be between 160-200 pounds. I vary depending on the time of the month between 200-210 But everyone here thinks I'm fat. Super Skinny Calista Flockheart women are just plain nasty in my opinion

160-200 is a pretty big range~

that being said, I much much prefer women who are carrying a bit extra weight compared to women where you can count their ribs or see their fucking spine from 20 feet away

My rule is, if the chick weighs less than half of what I do, gtfo.

I weigh 200-210 at 6'1", if you are half of that, gtfo.

This is of course a generalization...

Well, Janet being so tall is acceptable to be around the 160 range. And Gyps... I'm not being a judgmental dickhead. I just don't understand how some of these herefords can just let themselves go like that. It's sad more than anything.

Tikker wrote:you're also closer to being a senior citizen than a teenager now

ps, there's a reason you're still single too

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic.

Just remember, fat chicks try harder.

well at your age, a lot of them are probably single moms etc - in your late 30s early 40s, of course your metabolism is going to slow and it's going to be a lot harder to keep weight off. believe it or not it's simply not as easy to lose weight as a woman as it is for a man

I'm sure the chicks you're looking at don't look at it as 'letting themselves go' - they just don't care because they're happy with who they are

having a few extra pounds is one thing - the people who disgust *me* are the ones who let themselves get to a point where they need a wheelchair in walmart because they're too lazy to walk around the store

I just don't want a woman to weigh more than me. I hope that isn't too much to ask for, especially since I am not by any means a small guy, but I am healthy. Though, I'm right around 200 now, and I probably would not be attracted to a 200 pound woman. 160 is probably my realistic limit now, and that's only if she's on the tall side.

Know what I really hate? Big women that think they're the shit because they've been with one or two "attractive" men that were into the fat thing. Fat women that think they deserve what they themselves are obviously unwilling to work for. Same goes for men.

that's a pretty sad generalization kaiine.. the 'fat women think they deserve blahblah' - it depends on the woman just like anything else

at 200 lbs that's completely understandable that you wouldn't want someone to weigh as much as you, that's pretty hefty.. when I weighed that much I disgusted myself - at my height 200 lbs is quite a lot.

i won't bother to lie, i weigh a pound more than Jonathan - but he's a rail.

Here's the proper height:weight ratios for women:

5' 0" - 85
5' 1" - 90
5' 2" - 95
5' 3" - 100
5' 4" - 105
5' 5" - 110
5' 6" - 115
5' 7" - 120
5' 8" - 125
5' 9" - 130
5' 10" - 135
5' 11" - 140


The only allowance is +/- 5 pounds for each height listed as long as it's lean muscle mass, and not cellulite.
Anything after that... I'm not interested in

You're a tool.

Harrison wrote:You're a tool.

Thanks buddy. Much appreciated. I'm very into slender women, sorry. Not anorexic, just slender and healthy-looking.

Those height to weight ratios are damned near unhealthily frail.

I wonder how I'd look at 110. When I'm down to 140 @ 5'5 I look skeletal. I think men and woman all have different frames as in shoulder width and stuff. Someone told me once I'm a typical old world German girl. I can look rail thin and sick @ 140 but at 160-170, I look damn good.

If teeny girls are what you like though, that's fine, whatever floats yer boat.

Jennay wrote:I wonder how I'd look at 110. When I'm down to 140 @ 5'5 I look skeletal. I think men and woman all have different frames as in shoulder width and stuff. Someone told me once I'm a typical old world German girl. I can look rail thin and sick @ 140 but at 160-170, I look damn good.

If teeny girls are what you like though, that's fine, whatever floats yer boat.

Awesome, sensible post

Don't get hung up on numbers, Eric. Just go by whether the girl looks healthy or not.

I always found the women i found the most attractive were the ones who were willing to put out for me