Page 1 of 2

Then their were four

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:19 pm
by LostCause
AFC Championship Game

New England Patriots vs San Diego Chargers



NFC Championship Game

N.Y. Giants vs Greenbay Packers



At the beginning of the season I had made a 50 dollar bet that it would be a repeat of the 1996 Superbowl. I sure would like to have a extra 50 dollars Next Sunday =D


DEBATE.

PS. Giants you surprized me

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:23 pm
by Tikker
it'll be a packers vs patriots superbowl

chargers are just too banged up, and blew their wad against the colts (I think) to take out the pats

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:59 am
by Evermore
TO is a vagina.



I have to agree with TIkker. I dont think the Giants are gunna take the Pack at home thou they do have a very good road record this year

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:36 pm
by Lyion
Tikker wrote:it'll be a packers vs patriots superbowl

chargers are just too banged up, and blew their wad against the colts (I think) to take out the pats


Pat's still gotta win it. No doubt they are rightly heavily favored, but an offside Merriman hit placing Brady in the hospital is all it'll take. God, that'd be good to see.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:41 pm
by Zanchief
Lyion wrote:
Tikker wrote:it'll be a packers vs patriots superbowl

chargers are just too banged up, and blew their wad against the colts (I think) to take out the pats


Pat's still gotta win it. No doubt they are rightly heavily favored, but an offside Merriman hit placing Brady in the hospital is all it'll take. God, that'd be good to see.


I don't know shit about Football but I my dads a big Pats fan and I always root for anyone who plays them because I think Boston sports fans are among the worst in the world. He hates the Chargers so next weeks game could be interesting if we see an upset.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:32 pm
by Gaazy
Wait. What the fuck did you just say Chief? Boston fans are among the worst in the world?

Holy shit............I agree with you on something......did the world just end? They are top 3. If anything, just for their godamn accents. Then again, im sure my appalachia would annoy the shit outta all of you. Bwoooston and NYC fans both make me want to take a shit and eat it before putting up with them

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:34 pm
by Gaazy
Oh, and those godamn Duke basketball fans...fuckin yuppies...

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:33 pm
by Zanchief
The Celtics and the Pats blatantly cheated and we're supposed to be happy about it because their teams are doing well?

Fuck the city of Boston.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:25 am
by Evermore
Gaazy wrote:Wait. What the fuck did you just say Chief? Boston fans are among the worst in the world?

Holy shit............I agree with you on something......did the world just end? They are top 3. If anything, just for their godamn accents. Then again, im sure my appalachia would annoy the shit outta all of you. Bwoooston and NYC fans both make me want to take a shit and eat it before putting up with them




Gazz,

Come to Philly and wear an opposing teams jersey to an Eagles game...

Trust me Boston and NYC fans are amatures.

few years ago, i was at a birds game with my son. they were playing the lions. this kid, couldnt have been more then 12 was wearing a lions jersey walking thru the stands, His dad had to shelter him and run for the tunnel because of all the beers and sodas that were raining down on them. Eagles fans are probably the biggest assholes in football. Its funny thou cause that mostly centers on the eagles. the rest of philly teams fans dont really act that way.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:34 am
by Lyion
Zanchief wrote:The Celtics and the Pats blatantly cheated and we're supposed to be happy about it because their teams are doing well?

Fuck the city of Boston.


Hey, something Tikk, Zan, and I agree upon.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:52 am
by Kramer
wah wah wah.

the pats will win and they will all cry themselves straight to the bank and record books because of what you guys are saying.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:05 am
by Tikker
no, the pats will win because they probably have the best team with by far the fewest injuries of anyone left (except maybe the packers)

if the chargers were 100% healthy, I would say they have a comparable talent level to compete with the pats

with all their top players on offense nicked up, I think they'll be in tough against them

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:47 am
by Lyion
Plus the fact the Chargers have an entirely new coaching staff.

Although that may be a plus, since the Pat's can't break out the VCR collection to get inside info regarding signals and plays.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:57 am
by Evermore
yea but its Norv Turner.....

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:23 pm
by Tikker
yeah, and norv turner has never been on any superbowl winning teams before...

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:43 pm
by Harrison
Lyion wrote:Plus the fact the Chargers have an entirely new coaching staff.

Although that may be a plus, since the Pat's can't break out the VCR collection to get inside info regarding signals and plays.


:rolleyes: It didn't work for the other teams doing it. The Patriots are just the best football team out there, period.

I know people love to hate on who is on top. And it sure is fucking hilarious watching them whine.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:23 pm
by Lyion
The best team is the won who wins the Super Bowl. The #1 seed loses pretty frequently in Championship games. It'd be awesome if they lost!

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:30 pm
by Diekan
Lyion wrote:Plus the fact the Chargers have an entirely new coaching staff.

Although that may be a plus, since the Pat's can't break out the VCR collection to get inside info regarding signals and plays.


Yes, because all of that game film coaches watch each and every week in prep for up and coming games don't ever, ever show signals being sent back and forth.

You see, the ONLY way you could ever, ever catch the play signals is to use a magical camera placed at secret location on the sidelines.

You haters really need to get over this whole 'spygate' thing. EVERY TEAM has film on EVERY OTHER team. If you don't think for a second that [they] aren't studying the signals and every other aspect of their op, then you're a moron.

You ever wonder WHY several people send in plays at the same time? You kow.... two or three fake plays with one real play. Ever wonder why cords place their clipboard over their mouths when they call plays in?

Oh - that's right - the Pats are the *only* team to have ever dared try and capture the play calling/signals of the other team.

You're just pissed your shitty Browns - or whatever shitty team -- you live in Ohio now so I am guessing you've drop being a Falcons fan and jumped on an Ohio team -- doesn't matter because they're both complete shit teams -- didn't even make the play offs.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:47 pm
by Tikker
you're such a stupid fucker diekan

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:08 pm
by brinstar
all members of all boston-area teams should die

except papelbon, he's cool

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:40 am
by Evermore
Tikker wrote:yeah, and norv turner has never been on any superbowl winning teams before...



being on one and being the head coach on one is 2 different things....


http://www.pro-football-reference.com/coaches/TurnNo0.htm

a 69/87 record does not contsistute a winning coach. Norv is a good Coordinator he just sucks as a head coach

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:32 am
by Tikker
dude

he took a shitty fucking snyder redskins team from 3-13 up to 10-6 and won a playoff game with them, then inherited an abysmal raiders team and didn't get the chance to do more than maybe 2 drafts

that's a horrible example

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:48 am
by Evermore
Yes Tikk 1 playoff win makes him an awesome coach. Watch what happens with the Chargers. same shit as what is going to happen with the Cowboys. Wade Phillips sucks worse then Turner.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:43 am
by Phlegm
The Giants reminds me of the Steelers from two years ago. They could win it all.

Re: Then their were four

Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:05 am
by Lyion
Diekan wrote:Yes, because all of that game film coaches watch each and every week in prep for up and coming games don't ever, ever show signals being sent back and forth.

You see, the ONLY way you could ever, ever catch the play signals is to use a magical camera placed at secret location on the sidelines.

You haters really need to get over this whole 'spygate' thing. EVERY TEAM has film on EVERY OTHER team. If you don't think for a second that [they] aren't studying the signals and every other aspect of their op, then you're a moron.

You ever wonder WHY several people send in plays at the same time? You kow.... two or three fake plays with one real play. Ever wonder why cords place their clipboard over their mouths when they call plays in?

Oh - that's right - the Pats are the *only* team to have ever dared try and capture the play calling/signals of the other team.

You're just pissed your shitty Browns - or whatever shitty team -- you live in Ohio now so I am guessing you've drop being a Falcons fan and jumped on an Ohio team -- doesn't matter because they're both complete shit teams -- didn't even make the play offs.


Stop lashing out, just because you are an emo bandwagon fanbois. It's not like the real fans take you seriously, or you could get a joke.

I'm sure you can find another board full of Patriot fans just like yourself, although I'm sorry to say most would be 12 or chicks, but heck, given your postings, that seems to be your target demographic.