namelesstavern.net

http://www.climatedepot.com/a/429/Repor ... al-Hearing


Algore is such a chicken-shit asshole. He KNOWS he was going to get his ass handed to him and to be made a fool of by the presentation of facts against his "global warming" bullshit.

I'm not sure which one of these clowns I can't stand more... algore or Barry.

^~~ I agree.

Why is it impossible for you to type out Al Gore (two words)? You aren't being witty, you're being annoying.

Darcler wrote:^~~ I agree.

Why is it impossible for you to type out Al Gore (two words)? You aren't being witty, you're being annoying.

Because typing it, "algore" instead of separated, is offensive and disrespectful to him. Anyway, "real" scientists have proven algore wrong over and over and over again. Now that somebody had an opportunity to invalidate algore's claims, right in front of him, and before Congress, he backs out and has Henry Waxman decline the debate. Doesn't that tell you something Darcler? Or are you afraid of hearing the truth about global warming? The truth doesn't come from algore's claims... it comes from the hundreds of accomplished scientists who will refute algore's claims before congress. It sounds more and more to me that algore struck up a deal with auto-makers and God knows who else, to get kickbacks for knowing that eventually, a socialist president would make the auto-makers build more "green" cars. It was a brilliant strategy by algore, but unfortunately for him, there are many of us regular folk who can see right through his deceit.

/yawn

Holy crap, you mean the democrats wouldn't want to have a very conservative journalist who receives a significant amount of funding from oil companies testifying?

Narrock wrote:

Darcler wrote:^~~ I agree.

Why is it impossible for you to type out Al Gore (two words)? You aren't being witty, you're being annoying.

Because typing it, "algore" instead of separated, is offensive and disrespectful to him.

yep, pretty much the same reason he says ol barry instead of barack or obama.

leah wrote:

Narrock wrote:

Darcler wrote:^~~ I agree.

Why is it impossible for you to type out Al Gore (two words)? You aren't being witty, you're being annoying.

Because typing it, "algore" instead of separated, is offensive and disrespectful to him.

yep, pretty much the same reason he says ol barry instead of barack or obama.

Yeah that one is pretty annoying too.

And no Mindia, that tells me nothing because I dont care. I have little to no clue what Al Gore has said about Global Warming or what other people have said about Al Gore saying something about Global Warming.

Darcler wrote:

Narrock wrote:

Darcler wrote:^~~ I agree.


Because typing it, "algore" instead of separated, is offensive and disrespectful to him.

yep, pretty much the same reason he says ol barry instead of barack or obama.

Yeah that one is pretty annoying too.

And no Mindia, that tells me nothing because I dont care. I have little to no clue what Al Gore has said about Global Warming or what other people have said about Al Gore saying something about Global Warming.

Basically, algore made claims at various summits and other meetings that "earth has a cold," and that it is man-made. Hundreds of scientists have invalidated this claim. Algore also claimed that "global warming" is man made. Hundreds of scientists also invalidated this claim with proof (scientific example after example), hence making algore looking like a fool with his dick in his hand. Global warming is cyclical. This is scientific fact.

Sorry, Mindia, but the vast majority of the scientific community disagrees with you. I know you don't believe it, but unfortunately, most of the world's climatologists, etc. do believe it.

Again, I'm not going to go into all of the scientific data and explanations that show this, but humans at least influencing global warming (ie, even if there is a cyclical effect going on, we're still impacting it and making things worse) is accepted as a given by most countries and the UN.

-Arlos

No way. Things are getting better. I hate cold weather.

Because typing it, "algore" instead of separated, is offensive and disrespectful to him.

Yes, because I am sure he is offended when a truck driver who spends his free time as an internet forum troll calls him "algore". You win Mindia!

Narrock wrote: Hundreds of scientists also invalidated this claim with proof (scientific example after example), hence making algore looking like a fool with his dick in his hand. Global warming is cyclical. This is scientific fact.

you don't get science on your side in one argument and religion in another

pick a side of the fence troll

Furthermore, I never understood why someone made to look like a fool would have his "dick in his hand". By that logic, would I be made a fool every time I went #1?

Ginzburgh wrote: went #1?

You're adorable.

Tikker wrote:

Narrock wrote: Hundreds of scientists also invalidated this claim with proof (scientific example after example), hence making algore looking like a fool with his dick in his hand. Global warming is cyclical. This is scientific fact.

you don't get science on your side in one argument and religion in another

pick a side of the fence troll

I refer back to why it's stupidity on a supreme level to say the two are mutually exclusive.

Is a climatologist who believes in a God, or Gods, any less competent than one who does not? Of course not...

So why does he have to "pick a side"? Troll.

you're missing the point again josh

fuckwit up there is trying to use science to discredit global warming in this thread, while in another thread he is ignoring science because he doesn't like the idea of evolution

tikker's point has nothing to do with exclusivity, it has to do with jumping the fence when the topic changes

not that there isn't already a vast backlog showing a tendency for waffling

Eh, tikker's frothing hate for everything that even leans towards religion is sickening lol

People who pull that shit irk me. I have a few friends who equate beliefs to stupidity as well. Ignorance like that annoys me.

This isn't in defense of Mindia or anything. It's just a constant annoyance.

fair enough, but that's the thing about sweeping generalizations-- they wouldn't happen if they weren't right once in a while

there are folks out there that choose their beliefs based on a very thorough and personal investigation, upon which they spend a lot of time and thought

then there are folks dumb as a sack of hammers that just use their beliefs as insulation from thinking

you're missing the point again josh

fuckwit up there is trying to use science to discredit global warming in this thread, while in another thread he is ignoring science because he doesn't like the idea of evolution

tikker's point has nothing to do with exclusivity, it has to do with jumping the fence when the topic changes

not that there isn't already a vast backlog showing a tendency for waffling

Mmm, waffles.

i made cheesy noodle casserole tonight, it was delicious. waffles would've been better though.

waffles, bacon and syrup...mmmmmmm