Page 1 of 2

GO Seahawks, GO Eagles, GO Bucs

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 3:25 pm
by mofish
But most of all, GO SAINTS. WHODAT :kaos:

Re: GO Seahawks, GO Eagles, GO Bucs

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 4:47 pm
by Shannan
mofish wrote:But most of all, GO SAINTS. WHODAT :kaos:



:bowdown: Ditto

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 5:06 pm
by Tadpole
Beating the Falcon's w/o Michael Vick SURE is tough. :)

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 5:36 pm
by mofish
Every defensive starter played for the Falcons today. And we ripped that D a new one. Sure they were minus Vick, Im not saying the game wasnt easier because of that. But Saints are playing lights-out right now, Vick or no Vick. Our defense was on track to being one of the worst defenses in the history of the NFL. NOT ANYMORE BABY! Opponents averaging less than 15 pts a game last 4 games. Our linebackers are actually playing like real NFL players now.Mike McKenzie is playing incredibly, our D Line has finally come together, making huge plays. Charles Grant, Will Smith, Darren Howard = BEASTS. Joe horn = most catches, most yards in entire NFL. Deuce was running on one good ankle all year, it isnt 100% yet, but you can see the improvement. 5 100 yard games in a row now. So, go ahead and talk smack if you want, the way we played earlier in the year we deserve it. But we arent playing like that anymore. One team to go. We beat Carolina (granted tough game), we are in the playoffs.

WHODAT WHODAT WHODAT

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:05 pm
by Phlegm
Mofish, you really changed your tune lately. So now you dont think they should fire the coach anymore? It does really matter since Carolina will win next week anyhow.

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:10 pm
by mofish
Yeah, I have changed my tune, I admit it. But hey, I was steaming mad, like every Saints fan, earlier in the season. We keep winning ball games and playing like we give a shit, and Im all for a stay of execution for Haslett. Ive always been a Haslett supporter, and Saints optimist, but even a glass-half-full guy like me has a breakdown point lol.

And Carolina winning next week isnt a given. Thats why they play the games right :)

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:12 pm
by Phlegm
mofish wrote:And Carolina winning next week isnt a given. Thats why they play the games right :)


Yep, just ask Jacksonville about sure thing games. :wink:

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:16 pm
by mofish
Haha, man, what an ass whipping. With the playoffs on the line :eyecrazy:

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:18 pm
by Tadpole
When the offense struggles, as it did for Atlanta, the defense is on more, hence the offense being on more for the Saints, wearing down the Falcon's defense. That is why they "ripped that D a new one".

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:20 pm
by Phlegm
Well, Byron Leftwich got hurt and their backup qb suck.

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:22 pm
by Tadpole
Garrad is not that bad. He has the size compared to Leftwich.

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:23 pm
by mofish
Part of the reason maybe. But I dont buy it. Our entire team is playing improved ball, I dont care if were playing the Steelers or Harvard. Atlanta's time of possession was not horrible, although ours was better. So its not like their D was on the field for 60 minutes.

Time of Possession
Saints 33:05
Falcons 26:55

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:25 pm
by Tadpole
The Falcon's offense is complete and utter ass without Vick. Look at the Falcon's record over the past years without and with Vick, and you will see.

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:32 pm
by Phlegm
The steelers got Maddox playing now since Roethlisberger got hurt. Most likely Roethlisberger will sit out next week against the bills. That fucking suck. The steelers are rack with injuries but luckily keep on winning

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:34 pm
by Phlegm
With the loss today the sorry ass niners clinched first pick overall. Now the fish and the browns are playing for the second pick overall. Loser gets it. Most likely it will be the browns

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:34 pm
by Tadpole
They don't need a QB to win, they rely on pounding the ball with Duce and Jerome, and a stellar D.

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:41 pm
by Phlegm
Staley is hurt. He missed 5 out of the last 6 games. Their D is missing nose tackle Hampton, lb Bell and Haggan, cb Scott. Another cb Townsend broke his hand today and will miss next week's game.

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:43 pm
by Phlegm
Jesus Christ, the fucking Browns really bring suckage to whole new level. Almost at the niners' suckage level

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:43 pm
by Tadpole
They still have Jerome, and look how he has done filling in for Staley. They've been missing several players the whole year, and they've still been the best D in the NFL.

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:47 pm
by Phlegm
Yeah, Bettis is great this year only 60 yards from a 1k yards. And he restructured his contract and accept less money to stay with the team this year. Lucky for the steelers.

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:47 pm
by Tadpole
There is the reason Surtain, Madison, and Knight are not going to be with us next year.

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:49 pm
by Phlegm
Triple coverage and still touchdown

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2004 9:49 am
by Xaiveir
mofish wrote:Part of the reason maybe. But I dont buy it. Our entire team is playing improved ball, I dont care if were playing the Steelers or Harvard. Atlanta's time of possession was not horrible, although ours was better. So its not like their D was on the field for 60 minutes.

Time of Possession
Saints 33:05
Falcons 26:55



You do realize this is a big difference in ToP (time of possesion) right? Doesnt sound like much, but it is.

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2004 11:02 am
by Tacks
Saints are a lock for the Super Bowl...oh wait LAWLZ

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2004 4:05 pm
by mofish
Haha. SUPERBOWL BABY! Making the playoffs at 8-8 would be hilarious. Making the Superbowl at 8-8 regular season record would be the funniest thing ever.

SUPERBOWL SAINTS gogogogo