Page 1 of 1

No baseball or softball in the olympics as of 2012

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:19 pm
by Gidan
<b>SINGAPORE -- London will stage a reduced Olympic Games in 2012 after baseball and softball were wiped from the program in a controversial vote on Friday.</b>

London's showpiece will now feature 26 sports rather than 28.

This came after after International Olympic Committee members rejected proposals to replace the axed sports with two from rugby sevens, golf, squash, karate and roller sports.

Baseball and softball failed to win a majority of votes in a ballot of members at the IOC Session and became the first sports to be cut from the Games since polo in 1936.

IOC members went through seven rounds of voting to decide which two of the five would-be Olympic sports should be put up for a vote to give them Olympic status.

Having selected squash and karate, the members then overwhelmingly rejected their bids to join the Olympic program.

The last Olympics to be staged with just 26 sports was Atlanta in 1996.

Although London will have two less sports than Beijing in 2008, it is expected the IOC will tweak the program of events and boost numbers among the events so the Games will be no smaller than Beijing's.

"It's entirely a matter for the IOC. We're delighted to deliver a Games with 26 sports," said London 2012 communications director Mike Lee.

"There will be some savings through not having temporary venues in Regents Park but it is not a major consideration.

"We will deliver the Games the IOC want."

Lee said Regents Park will now likely be used to stage cultural events during the Games period.

In 2002 the IOC capped the number of sports at an Olympic Games at 28, the number of events at 301 and the number of athletes at 10,500.

At that same session in Mexico City, IOC president Jacques Rogge proposed that baseball, softball and modern pentathlon be dropped, and golf and rugby union added. However, IOC members resisted and no vote was taken.

"This is payback for Mexico City," a visibly shocked softball federation chief Don Porter said after his sport's rejection. "They wanted us out in 2002. It has taken them three years but they have got us.

"We didn't expect this at all. The discussions we have had all week led us to believe we were safe to assume the program would remain unchanged for 2012.

"I don't want to say it's an anti-U.S. thing, but they are two native American sports."

Baseball federation president Aldo Notari said: "The problem with baseball is that the best players are not going to the Olympics Games.

"But baseball is still in Beijing. It is still necessary to work for the future in 2016," the Italian added.

Rogge urged the two sports not to lose heart. "Needless to say, these sports will be disappointed," he said. "But this does not disqualify them forever.

"Olympic sports they are in Beijing, and Olympic sports they will remain. As such they will remain eligible for the Olympic program after 2012."

The sports program for 2016 will be voted on after the 2008 Beijing Games.

Once again all Olympics sports -- including softball and baseball who do not lose their status -- will be put to a vote one-by-one.

IOC members were shocked by the ejections. "I am very surprised," German member Thomas Bach said. "I did not expect this."

Australian Olympic Committee chairman John Coates was saddened by the result. "I'm shocked and disappointed. It is very sad to lose two of our member sports.

"Problems with doping in U.S. baseball probably cost the sport dearly. Softball was a bigger shock especially with the push within the IOC to further increase women's participation in the Olympics."

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:12 pm
by Tikker
it doesn't even really surprise me that much

same reason you don't see american football in the olympics


it's not a widely played sport (even if immensely popular)

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:27 pm
by Thon
they're are people out there that wan't bridge(the card game) to be an olympic sport

they need to cut some more of the shit they have

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:51 pm
by Tikker
I agree

anything that involves judges making subjective decisions should be gone

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 5:20 pm
by Emongmai
The only countries in the Olympics with competitive teams are the U.S, Japan, Taiwan, Cuba, and Austrailia. There really is no reason to give out medals in a five team competition. Also, without sending MLB players I have never really watched an olympic baseball game. Its not like basketball where we finally started sending professionals to represent the U.S. in '92. We could never send MLB players even if they were willing to go since the Olympics falls right in the middle of the MLB season.

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:23 pm
by Phlegm
Emongmai wrote: We could never send MLB players even if they were willing to go since the Olympics falls right in the middle of the MLB season.


Although it very unlikely that major league players would play in the Olympics. That point is now moot, but the NHL did sent players to the olympics that also occur during its season.

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:24 pm
by Phlegm
If they did add rugby, that would be fuck up. Since rugby probably have the same amount of participation as baseball.

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 9:24 pm
by Snero
hockey has the olympics in the middle of the season, and they worked it in. There was just less time between games, which didn't do the players a lot of good granted. This year they're going to turin and they're cancelling the all star game to work it in without any other major disruptions