Page 1 of 2

Al Qaeda promises more UK, US attack

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:01 am
by Phlegm
From CNN.com:

Osama bin Laden's No. 2 man in al Qaeda has threatened more destruction in London, saying that British Prime Minister Tony Blair would be to blame.

In a video broadcast Thursday on Arabic-language TV station Al Jazeera Ayman al-Zawahiri also issued a warning for the United States.

"To the British, I am telling you that Blair brought you destruction in the middle of London and more will come, God willing," he said.

He appeared to be referring to the two attacks on London's transit system on July 7 and July 21. The first bombings killed 52 commuters and the four bombers. No one was killed in the second attack, in which the bombs failed to detonate.

Al-Zawahiri, a 54-year-old Egyptian doctor, is bin Laden's closest adviser. After the September 11, 2001 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people, the U.S. State Department offered a $25 million award for information leading to al-Zawahiri's apprehension.

In the video, al-Zawahiri also issued several warnings for the United States.

"Our message is clear -- what you saw in New York and Washington (in 2001) and what you are seeing in Afghanistan and Iraq, all these are nothing compared to what you will see next."

He also warned the United States to "stop stealing our oil and wealth and stop supporting corrupt rulers."

"If you continue your politics against Muslims, you will see, God willing, such horror that you will forget the horrors of Vietnam."

Al-Zawahiri reminded the United States and its allies of the "hudna" (truce) that bin Laden offered last year in return for the withdrawal of foreign troops from Muslim lands.

"Didn't Osama bin Laden tell you that you would never dream of peace until we actually live it in Palestine and before all the infidel armies withdraw from the land of Mohammed?

"Instead (of accepting the truce), you spilled rivers of blood in our countries, and we exploded volcanoes of anger in your countries."

He told the American people that their leaders are lying to them about the Iraq war and called for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. forces.

"The truth that has been kept from you by (President) Bush, (Secretary of State Condoleezza) Rice and (Defense Secretary Donald) Rumsfeld is that there is no way out of Iraq without immediate withdrawal, and any delay on this means only more dead, more losses.

"If you don't leave today, certainly you will leave tomorrow, and after tens of thousands of dead, and double that figure in disabled and wounded."

A U.S. intelligence official told CNN the video was being analyzed, but quickly pointed out that "there has never been a false tape" from al-Zawahiri.

Another U.S. official did not read much into the fact that al-Zawahiri and not bin Laden made the videotape. The official said there have been few videotapes of bin Laden since the September 11 attacks, and most of the time it has been hard to determine when the tapes were made because there is either no audio or the message did not contain any timely references.

The last time bin Laden released a statement was in an audiotape late last December when he praised Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and designated him the al Qaeda leader in Iraq.

Al-Zawahiri made no mention of the July 23 bombings in the Egyptian resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh that killed at least 83 people and injured more than 200 others, which could indicate the tape was made before that date.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:09 am
by kaharthemad
2 words...tactical nuke.


we need to lay waste to the whole fucking area

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:20 am
by xaoshaen
kaharthemad wrote:2 words...tactical nuke.


we need to lay waste to the whole fucking area


Tactical nukes are expressly designed to not lay waste to the whole fucking area.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:32 am
by kaharthemad
true, but if you use enough of them


ok let me rephrase Trident Nuke.

one Trident sub should make that place glow

if we dont want the radiation I think getting out overstock of napalm from Korea and vietnam undercontrol.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:35 am
by Zanchief
kaharthemad wrote:2 words...tactical nuke.


we need to lay waste to the whole fucking area


Or maybe you should do something about it instead of dicking around in Iraq?

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:40 am
by kaharthemad
like you guys argueing with Denmark and about to go to war over a fucking rock in the middle of the Atlantic ocean?


BTW on a real note Zan.. I have heard the Denmark side of this. what is your take?

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:44 am
by Zanchief
That's on topic.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:45 am
by kaharthemad
point takene...Ill move it. anywho I would be interested to hear your side of it.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:59 am
by Langston
Strategic Nuke... I think is what you're looking for.

/agree

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 12:02 pm
by xaoshaen
Zanchief wrote:
kaharthemad wrote:2 words...tactical nuke.


we need to lay waste to the whole fucking area


Or maybe you should do something about it instead of dicking around in Iraq?


As long as the various terrorist groups keep sending their recruits to Iraq to die, they're not blowing up civilians over here.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 12:24 pm
by Zanchief
xaoshaen wrote:
Zanchief wrote:
kaharthemad wrote:2 words...tactical nuke.


we need to lay waste to the whole fucking area


Or maybe you should do something about it instead of dicking around in Iraq?


As long as the various terrorist groups keep sending their recruits to Iraq to die, they're not blowing up civilians over here.


Tell that to the English.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:05 pm
by Captain Insano
We should ban the islamic religion in this country and anyone who worships it.

We should then destroy the entire middle east and create new states out of it.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:31 pm
by Harrison
The United Middle East of America

I like that.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:06 pm
by veeneedefeesh
Why is it that they can publicize shit like this, every freaking radical muslim in the area is following on their word, and probably have a general idea where the fuggers are, but the USA with all our mighty power, and satellite surveilance and huge intelligence budgets, and armys and all the rest cant find them? I mean for christ sake Bin Laden is on KIDNEY DIALYSIS the man has to be hooked up to a machine every few weeks, and we can't lay our hands on him? WTF is that?

Personally I don't think we are actually trying to find Bin Laden, if we were we would have found his sorry goat sucking ass by now and served his head up on a silver platter to the Queen of England

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 10:46 pm
by labbats
I'm convinced that we need to find life on another planet. Then all religions would be put into question and this whole mess would unravel itself.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:26 am
by Captain Insano
God save the queen!

I agree with labbats... This whole organized religion thing is really fucking this planet up.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:53 am
by Ganzo
Harrison wrote:The United Middle East of America
Wouldn't it be United States of Middle East than? Or you planing to use so much nukes to change geography?

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:51 am
by Martrae
Did you guys see where the ACLU has filed suit to stop even the random searches they do of bags on New York City subways and busses? WTF are they thinking??? I swear they WANT terrorists to blow up some more people.

They SHOULD be profiling. They SHOULD do head to toes searches of anyone that looks Arabic. I don't care if that means that Mohammad from the corner deli gets searched over and over, maybe if enough of them get fed up with being suspected they'll do something about the ones that are blowing themselves up for Allah.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:45 am
by Ganzo
I give it 5 more years till we have security checks at entrance to all public places like Israel has

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:56 am
by Eziekial
Sadly, Ganzo, I think you are right in your prediction.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:13 pm
by Tuggan
Martrae wrote:Did you guys see where the ACLU has filed suit to stop even the random searches they do of bags on New York City subways and busses? WTF are they thinking??? I swear they WANT terrorists to blow up some more people.

They SHOULD be profiling. They SHOULD do head to toes searches of anyone that looks Arabic. I don't care if that means that Mohammad from the corner deli gets searched over and over, maybe if enough of them get fed up with being suspected they'll do something about the ones that are blowing themselves up for Allah.



land of the free, home of the brave.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 3:15 pm
by Martrae
It's not any worse than searching for a rapist based upon a description.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:02 pm
by Gidan
So what exactly does an arab look like? Is that any person who looks as though they share any bloodline with the middle east? Maybe anyone with a realy deep tan? Why limit this to just arab looking people? are you sayign that only arabs are terroists? If your going to search peopel because you think they look arab you may as well search everyone becasue anyoen could be a terrorist.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:46 pm
by Harrison
Gidan wrote:So what exactly does an arab look like? Is that any person who looks as though they share any bloodline with the middle east? Maybe anyone with a realy deep tan? Why limit this to just arab looking people? are you sayign that only arabs are terroists? If your going to search peopel because you think they look arab you may as well search everyone becasue anyoen could be a terrorist.


Why limit it to just middle eastern descent?

BECAUSE THAT'S WHO IS FUCKING KILLING PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD

Quite a simple notion really...

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:47 pm
by Harrison
Oh no, we might hurt some feelings...

Boo

Fucking

Hoo

If you're not a terrorist and get searched. You better feel fucking lucky. These searches might save your life one day. (If we can ever silence the whiny bitches long enough to get these done regularly)