Page 1 of 7

If you play a Warrior...

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:35 am
by Zanchief
And go to instance groups without a shield, go shoot yourself right now so I don't ever have to deal with you.

Zanchief says "Hey Babyshoe, do you have a shield?"

Babyshoe says "I think it's in the bank."

The general WoW player has become so fucking awful you would be right to assume everyone you don't know personally is downright putrid at the game.

Hey Fin, you were looking for a challenge in WoW? Hit every instance with only random people. It's like the worst escort mission ever imagined.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:37 am
by Mop
i say hit a random group in LBRS for wyrm - that is a fucking challenge.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:42 am
by Zanchief
Back in the day we would run into morons, but they would at least listen to you.

Now they're twice as stupid and petulant. You think its special it took you 10 months to get all the way to 51? Fuck off and taunt for once bitch.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:47 am
by Mop
i was running maraduron the other day ( I need the fuckign dagger ok? lay off) and 3 warr in the group ( ya i know ) and none brought their shield I was like wtf

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:51 am
by Zanchief
Our warrior last night in ST would attack the normal mobs while I (Rogue) would tank all the elites.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:59 am
by Tacks
quit pulling agro, jerk

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:22 am
by Zanchief
Hard to keep off agro when the tank is off in the corner tanking a Whelp.

Fuck your brother for bailing on us to jerk off with you in WSG for 193340980942 night in a row.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:55 am
by Jeddas
How about this?



----------My Team---------------------Stupid Faggots-
51 Shaman + 49 Rogue (vs) 49 Paladin + 50 Paladin.

The fight was absolutly straight, and we won. How fucking bad did those paladins have to be? I'm still not sure.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:09 am
by Tacks
Zanchief wrote:Hard to keep off agro when the tank is off in the corner tanking a Whelp.

Fuck your brother for bailing on us to jerk off with you in WSG for 193340980942 night in a row.


I didn't do WSG with him thx

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:12 am
by Zanchief
You should have come with us anyways.

Bitch.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:22 am
by kaharthemad
Im starting to see points to your side of thinking Zan. As I play Alliance I have noticed when I group with guild memebr they know what the hell they are doing. When I find a pickup group none can fight. Other day there was a level 20 Shammy in duskwood. Noticing that a flagged level 20 in duskwood was prolly a trap I shadowmeld and sat around to watch. I counted 5 horde using the level 20 shaman as Bait. Out of the 5, 3 of them were Rogues 1 hunter and the Gimp Shammy. of the 20 people that showed up 18 of them took it in the head because they would see this guy and immediately attack him. of the 18 12 of them were level 50 or higher and should have known better.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:30 am
by Zanchief
I don't know what I'm gonna do when my rogue hits 60 and needs to clear LBRS...

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:53 am
by The Kizzy
Did 10sun use a sheild when he played? I can't remember, because he duel weilded, and could tank and keep aggro on 3-4 mobs. Best warrior ever in my opinion.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:12 am
by Zanchief
Kizzy wrote:he duel weilded...Best warrior ever in my opinion.


Something doesn't add up.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:52 am
by Tacks
lmao, thats what happens when you know nothing about game mechanics

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:04 pm
by The Kizzy
I'm entitled to my opinion.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:29 pm
by Jazendar
I was on my mage alt, doing SM Cathedral with a pickup the other day. It was 2 shamans 2 warriors and I.

Man these guys must have been 12, they wiped twice getting to SM, once going in the wrong instance looking for me, and 2 more times in the cathedral itself aggroing mobs (one of which was whitemane). It was horrible, i told this guy to stop acting like an idiot, he replied "did u just call me an idiot?" I replied "no, I said stop acting like one." And he promtly leaves the group...These 4 were guildies btw. Another responds "hey u no name calling!"

I left the group, but I ask myself, why can't these kids stay on Warcraft 3? Why do they have to suck enough to go buy World of Warcraft. I'm glad I made horde, I hear that every alliance player is fucking horrible, and judging by how bad they are in WSG, I wouldn't doubt it.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:34 pm
by Zanchief
Jazendar wrote:I'm glad I made horde, I hear that every alliance player is fucking horrible, and judging by how bad they are in WSG, I wouldn't doubt it.


I haven't spent any time in WSG yet, but I plan on owning some noobs once I hit 60 with my rogue.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:44 pm
by Arlos
All depends on the warrior's gear, Zan. You get a MC + Ony + BWL geared warrior in any 5-man instance, and they can tank as well or better than 99% of non-raiding warriors do with a shield. Hell, I as a paladin using a 2h'er can tank better than a lot of shield-using warriors who are still all in greens and a few blues.

-Arlos

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:51 pm
by Zanchief
Arlos wrote:All depends on the warrior's gear, Zan. You get a MC + Ony + BWL geared warrior in any 5-man instance, and they can tank as well or better than 99% of non-raiding warriors do with a shield. Hell, I as a paladin using a 2h'er can tank better than a lot of shield-using warriors who are still all in greens and a few blues.

-Arlos


1) He was lvl 51.
2) My retired Warrior (Unless asshole Kezz wants to get me killed in Strath) has 0 drops from MC and I tank better than any Warrior with MC gear and a 2 hander. Plus I tank better than most WITH a shield and MC gear.

But that's not my point. I hate these leet dudes who are all about the big dmg and the PVP builds who solo most of the game than can't do shit in a group. I see it all the time. I grouped with a warrior at 60 who did DM in it's entirety with a 2 handed axe and kept giving me updates on how his crit % was. Great job fuck head, what’s your dmg mitigation? There are classes for DPS, and Warrior aint one of em.

Know your class. I'm sure a warrior can perform adequately with a 2 hander. And they can do BETTER with a shield.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 2:36 pm
by Insanityfair
Sounds like someone wants to do another 5-man Baron run~

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 4:04 pm
by TStorm
Zanchief wrote:
Arlos wrote:All depends on the warrior's gear, Zan. You get a MC + Ony + BWL geared warrior in any 5-man instance, and they can tank as well or better than 99% of non-raiding warriors do with a shield. Hell, I as a paladin using a 2h'er can tank better than a lot of shield-using warriors who are still all in greens and a few blues.

-Arlos


1) He was lvl 51.
2) My retired Warrior (Unless asshole Kezz wants to get me killed in Strath) has 0 drops from MC and I tank better than any Warrior with MC gear and a 2 hander. Plus I tank better than most WITH a shield and MC gear.

But that's not my point. I hate these leet dudes who are all about the big dmg and the PVP builds who solo most of the game than can't do shit in a group. I see it all the time. I grouped with a warrior at 60 who did DM in it's entirety with a 2 handed axe and kept giving me updates on how his crit % was. Great job fuck head, what’s your dmg mitigation? There are classes for DPS, and Warrior aint one of em.

Know your class. I'm sure a warrior can perform adequately with a 2 hander. And they can do BETTER with a shield.



What???!?! You mean I'm not supposed to be the main tank for Warlords command with my 2hander and Bezerker stance!!

I was a duel-wielder in instances back in the day up until about level 40. At that point the damage mitigation far outweighed my ability to dps. Of course at 60 I'm still fury spec'd and tank just fine outside of MC.

-T

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 4:37 pm
by Tikker
My favourite was doing strat in a pickup group

the warrior was a retard, so we just kicked him out, and let my pet tank, since the warrior couldn't hold agro anyways


the pet needed a lot more healing, but could hold agro, so it was preferable (which is kind of sad)

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:07 am
by Langston
Jeddasbard wrote:How about this?



----------My Team---------------------Stupid Faggots-
51 Shaman + 49 Rogue (vs) 49 Paladin + 50 Paladin.

The fight was absolutly straight, and we won. How fucking bad did those paladins have to be? I'm still not sure.


I'm missing something there... you actually expected the two paladins should win that? That's like a guaranteed win for the shaman/rogue - as long as the shaman isn't stupid and blowing his mana early.

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 6:11 am
by Mop
they made lbrs easier if that makes you feel any better zan =D