Moderator: Dictators in Training
Harrison wrote:No, they do fucking not.Weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a term used to describe a munition with the capacity to indiscriminately kill large numbers of living beings. The phrase broadly encompasses several areas of weapon synthesis, including nuclear, biological, chemical (NBC) and, increasingly, radiological weapons.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
Tikker wrote:you go for it Lueyen
feel free to explain how they don't fit the bill~
Tikker wrote:I know it hurts your giant american ego to find out that you're no better than the "terrorists" that you've taken down, but it doesn't make it any less true~
Lueyen wrote:So tell me, which is it? Spouting bullshit or just being moronic?
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
10sun wrote:I'm with the retard posse here.
WMDs are a different class of weaponary than a simple SCUD. I mean, high explosive warhead.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests