Hussein to be executed before January 27
Moderator: Dictators in Training
Harrison wrote:No, they do fucking not.Weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a term used to describe a munition with the capacity to indiscriminately kill large numbers of living beings. The phrase broadly encompasses several areas of weapon synthesis, including nuclear, biological, chemical (NBC) and, increasingly, radiological weapons.
ps, feel free to explain how a high explosive bomb does NOT fit your aforementioned description
Tikker has volunteered to be the pivot man.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
Tikker wrote:you go for it Lueyen
feel free to explain how they don't fit the bill~
I didn't argue that they didn't, I simply stated that if that was the given definition of WMD then there was irrefutable proof Iraq under Saddam possessed them and tried to obtain more.
The assertion was made that conventional weapons used in Iraq by the United States were by definition WMD, and that possession and use of these weapons warranted George Bush's execution in that he was just as guilty as Saddam. What those failing to address in this line of thought was that by that logic the smoking gun of WMD becomes irrefutably true. Note that WMD was only one of the many reasons for US military action, however the one that many here constantly harp on is the lack of discovery of WMD, often times to the point of turning a blind eye to the other reasons. I find it in no small way humorous that the assertions of some of these very same people fail a simple logical circle... so either you know you are spouting extreme bs and pretending you honestly believe that, or your positions and arguments when fitted together make absolutely no sense. So tell me, which is it? Spouting bullshit or just being moronic?
Tikker wrote:I know it hurts your giant american ego to find out that you're no better than the "terrorists" that you've taken down, but it doesn't make it any less true~
Lueyen wrote:So tell me, which is it? Spouting bullshit or just being moronic?
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
Dear god man I wasn't calling for Neo-Hitlers head, I was just pointing out how subjective the term WMD is. It has no definition, if it did you would have found it furiously slamming down on your bile filed keyboard with your fat little fingers, just to inevitably “win” something, thus keeping those razors just one step further on your nightstand.
