Shockingly enough, I know I've learned a few things from some of the more well read/spoken folks here
not necessarily enough to change a point of view, but I'm definately willing to concede that I don't know everything =P
That being said, Mindia is the missing link in evolution
Everything evolves from a lower form
Rocks evolved from Mindia
After death
Moderator: Dictators in Training
Yes, I am a Christian. I love Jesus and I worship Him. I don't know what you crack-addicts are jabbering on about.
Yes, I believe that the RCC is a wolf in sheep's clothing. The Bible has predicted the RCC. It is the great whore of Babylon.
Yes, I believe that the Apocrypha was placed in the Bible for furtherance of the Catholic agenda.
Yes, liberalism is a mental disorder.
Yes, Jesus was a conservative by our measure of political parties today.
Yes, you Catholics and former Catholics are like Ostrichs' and sheep. Ostrichs' because you have your heads buried in the sand, thus preventing you from learning truth and gaining knowledge, and sheep because you follow your RCC doctrine and dogma around like little blind sheep following their shepherd.
Remain in your ignorant ways... it's no skin off my nose. :P
Yes, I believe that the RCC is a wolf in sheep's clothing. The Bible has predicted the RCC. It is the great whore of Babylon.
Yes, I believe that the Apocrypha was placed in the Bible for furtherance of the Catholic agenda.
Yes, liberalism is a mental disorder.
Yes, Jesus was a conservative by our measure of political parties today.
Yes, you Catholics and former Catholics are like Ostrichs' and sheep. Ostrichs' because you have your heads buried in the sand, thus preventing you from learning truth and gaining knowledge, and sheep because you follow your RCC doctrine and dogma around like little blind sheep following their shepherd.
Remain in your ignorant ways... it's no skin off my nose. :P
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Mindia wrote:Yes, I am a Christian. I love Jesus and I worship Him. I don't know what you crack-addicts are jabbering on about.
Yes, I believe that the RCC is a wolf in sheep's clothing. The Bible has predicted the RCC. It is the great whore of Babylon.
Yes, I believe that the Apocrypha was placed in the Bible for furtherance of the Catholic agenda.
Yes, liberalism is a mental disorder.
Yes, Jesus was a conservative by our measure of political parties today.
Yes, you Catholics and former Catholics are like Ostrichs' and sheep. Ostrichs' because you have your heads buried in the sand, thus preventing you from learning truth and gaining knowledge, and sheep because you follow your RCC doctrine and dogma around like little blind sheep following their shepherd.
Remain in your ignorant ways... it's no skin off my nose. :P
Is that how Jesus spoke to Mary Magdelin? She was pretty much an ignorant crackhead for the times. There were no crackheads, but lepers and prostitutes were on par with today's standards of crackheadedness.
Not that I exemplify maturity or the Catholic manner, but I don't proclaim to be all that religious.
Next time you head into church Mindia, do me a favor. Just imagine how all your friends, the priest, the choir, all of them would act if a leper pawed the door open and sat down in their rags. Or better yet, a real, honest to God piss-in-his-pants homeless drunk. Probably not too WWJD in that reaction I bet.
labbats wrote:Mindia wrote:Yes, I am a Christian. I love Jesus and I worship Him. I don't know what you crack-addicts are jabbering on about.
Yes, I believe that the RCC is a wolf in sheep's clothing. The Bible has predicted the RCC. It is the great whore of Babylon.
Yes, I believe that the Apocrypha was placed in the Bible for furtherance of the Catholic agenda.
Yes, liberalism is a mental disorder.
Yes, Jesus was a conservative by our measure of political parties today.
Yes, you Catholics and former Catholics are like Ostrichs' and sheep. Ostrichs' because you have your heads buried in the sand, thus preventing you from learning truth and gaining knowledge, and sheep because you follow your RCC doctrine and dogma around like little blind sheep following their shepherd.
Remain in your ignorant ways... it's no skin off my nose. :P
Is that how Jesus spoke to Mary Magdelin? She was pretty much an ignorant crackhead for the times. There were no crackheads, but lepers and prostitutes were on par with today's standards of crackheadedness.
Not that I exemplify maturity or the Catholic manner, but I don't proclaim to be all that religious.
Next time you head into church Mindia, do me a favor. Just imagine how all your friends, the priest, the choir, all of them would act if a leper pawed the door open and sat down in their rags. Or better yet, a real, honest to God piss-in-his-pants homeless drunk. Probably not too WWJD in that reaction I bet.
My church would invite him right in, because that's the kind of kind-hearted people we are. We feed the homeless every Tuesday evening too.
Again, you and the retard crew who keep posting here, keep missing the point. My problem is not with Catholic people... it's with the RCC. But Catholics will defend the RCC because they get offended when the truth is presented.
Ce la vie!
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
-
10sun
- NT Drunkard
- Posts: 9861
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 10:22 am
- Location: Westwood, California
- Contact:
Mindia wrote:labbats wrote:Mindia wrote:Yes, I am a Christian. I love Jesus and I worship Him. I don't know what you crack-addicts are jabbering on about.
Yes, I believe that the RCC is a wolf in sheep's clothing. The Bible has predicted the RCC. It is the great whore of Babylon.
Yes, I believe that the Apocrypha was placed in the Bible for furtherance of the Catholic agenda.
Yes, liberalism is a mental disorder.
Yes, Jesus was a conservative by our measure of political parties today.
Yes, you Catholics and former Catholics are like Ostrichs' and sheep. Ostrichs' because you have your heads buried in the sand, thus preventing you from learning truth and gaining knowledge, and sheep because you follow your RCC doctrine and dogma around like little blind sheep following their shepherd.
Remain in your ignorant ways... it's no skin off my nose. :P
Is that how Jesus spoke to Mary Magdelin? She was pretty much an ignorant crackhead for the times. There were no crackheads, but lepers and prostitutes were on par with today's standards of crackheadedness.
Not that I exemplify maturity or the Catholic manner, but I don't proclaim to be all that religious.
Next time you head into church Mindia, do me a favor. Just imagine how all your friends, the priest, the choir, all of them would act if a leper pawed the door open and sat down in their rags. Or better yet, a real, honest to God piss-in-his-pants homeless drunk. Probably not too WWJD in that reaction I bet.
My church would invite him right in, because that's the kind of kind-hearted people we are. We feed the homeless every Tuesday evening too.
Again, you and the retard crew who keep posting here, keep missing the point. My problem is not with Catholic people... it's with the RCC. But Catholics will defend the RCC because they get offended when the truth is presented.
Ce la vie!
My friend was walking home drunk from a party on the OSU campus a couple years back.
He didn't make it back to my place til like 8am and everybody was like, "where the fuck were you?"
"God eggs man, God eggs."
Apparently some church group was driving around in a van and loaded him into it and drove him back to the church where they gave him breakfast which was scrambled eggs and shit.
Scarred him for life and we made sure to always do the buddy program when coming back from parties.
Good story about churchs taking people in regardless if they want to do so or not.
-Adam
ps. Wasn't Jesus a Jew? Correct me if I am wrong.
-
liquidstayce
- NT Veteran
- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:17 am
- Location: B-More
- Contact:
Collective Soul sort of...
This explains it for me exactly...
"when the body dies, if the person merits it, small portion of the soul remains with it to keep it connected with the soul's source, anticipating the general revival of the dead at the time that G-d decrees. Different parts of the remainder of the soul
may go to different places. One might be reincarnated into a new body in an attempt to rectify another of its spiritual aspects, or for other purposes. One part might go to a level of Paradise. Another might go to Gehinnom for a period, to remove the sins of that life and prepare it for a future one. Another part might join temporarily with an already living person, to assist it with its rectification and in the process gather more merit. The reassignments of the soul continues until the time that God decrees."
Most religious Jews tend not to focus to much time on this question but rather living life according to the Torah and being a good Jew. I am not very religious but along with religious Jews I try not to focus on it. I also have a hard time with the whole Christian thing where people live a certain way because they fear going to hell and want to go to heaven.
I rather just spend more time following my own path to enlightenment in the here and now and being a better person then spending time focusing on the afterlife or letting that motivate me to be a better person. God, Heaven, Hell, Collective Soul, etc really are not motivators for me on how I live my life at all or get to that enlightenment.
This explains it for me exactly...
"when the body dies, if the person merits it, small portion of the soul remains with it to keep it connected with the soul's source, anticipating the general revival of the dead at the time that G-d decrees. Different parts of the remainder of the soul
may go to different places. One might be reincarnated into a new body in an attempt to rectify another of its spiritual aspects, or for other purposes. One part might go to a level of Paradise. Another might go to Gehinnom for a period, to remove the sins of that life and prepare it for a future one. Another part might join temporarily with an already living person, to assist it with its rectification and in the process gather more merit. The reassignments of the soul continues until the time that God decrees."
Most religious Jews tend not to focus to much time on this question but rather living life according to the Torah and being a good Jew. I am not very religious but along with religious Jews I try not to focus on it. I also have a hard time with the whole Christian thing where people live a certain way because they fear going to hell and want to go to heaven.
I rather just spend more time following my own path to enlightenment in the here and now and being a better person then spending time focusing on the afterlife or letting that motivate me to be a better person. God, Heaven, Hell, Collective Soul, etc really are not motivators for me on how I live my life at all or get to that enlightenment.
~stacy
My church would invite him right in, because that's the kind of kind-hearted people we are.
Interesting - I didn't know "kind-hearted people" called people who disagreed with their views crack-addicts, ignorant, and sheep.
"I think you may be confusing government running amok with government doing stuff you don't like. See, you're in the minority now. It's supposed to taste like a shit taco." - Jon Stewart
Gypsiyee wrote:My church would invite him right in, because that's the kind of kind-hearted people we are.
Interesting - I didn't know "kind-hearted people" called people who disagreed with their views crack-addicts, ignorant, and sheep.
Well that is soley because you are a fucking sheep following the ignorant masses of NT who are crack addicts.
Find salvation with mindia.
Narrock wrote:I don't like rabbits. They remind me of this chick I met on teh internet like 5 years ago.
Oh, Mindia's self-ownage is BEAUTIFUL.
So, Mindia, you falsely accused me of being a liar. You've not given one shred of proof of your accusation, and indeed, you couldn't do so because I haven't lied, not once. Therefore, you have, in this thread, "darken another man's name", and have yet to apologize for doing so. Therefore, you have most assuredly joined the ranks of: "Men who sin against this Rule," as all can plainly see.
And amazingly enough, you certainly fit the description at the end of that, with your ego, jealousy, contempt and lack of self-discipline. You did, after all, as a condition of your banning being revoked, promise to stop making ad hominem attacks against people on this board. So far, at the very least, you've accused Gypsiee (a happily married woman) of being a slut, and me of being a liar, both accusations wildly untrue, and both breaking the rules YOU agreed to when you came back. That speaks to a definite lack of self-discipline, yes? I think we can ALL speak to your ego and contempt.
How's it feel having blatantly broken this rule, and then self-owned yourself by calling attention to it?
-Arlos
Mindia, in another thread wrote:Quote:
THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS AGAINST THY NEIGHBOR.
"All men must be aware that to gossip or to darken another man's name or way will most certainly be accountable to Me. Each man is accountable for himself and will have to stand solely alone on the merits he earned walking the human role. Men who sin against this Rule will most likely sin against several of the others, for to bear false witness says ego, pride, jealousy, contempt, and a lack of self-discipline."
So, Mindia, you falsely accused me of being a liar. You've not given one shred of proof of your accusation, and indeed, you couldn't do so because I haven't lied, not once. Therefore, you have, in this thread, "darken another man's name", and have yet to apologize for doing so. Therefore, you have most assuredly joined the ranks of: "Men who sin against this Rule," as all can plainly see.
And amazingly enough, you certainly fit the description at the end of that, with your ego, jealousy, contempt and lack of self-discipline. You did, after all, as a condition of your banning being revoked, promise to stop making ad hominem attacks against people on this board. So far, at the very least, you've accused Gypsiee (a happily married woman) of being a slut, and me of being a liar, both accusations wildly untrue, and both breaking the rules YOU agreed to when you came back. That speaks to a definite lack of self-discipline, yes? I think we can ALL speak to your ego and contempt.
How's it feel having blatantly broken this rule, and then self-owned yourself by calling attention to it?
-Arlos
Arlos wrote:Oh, Mindia's self-ownage is BEAUTIFUL.Mindia, in another thread wrote:Quote:
THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS AGAINST THY NEIGHBOR.
"All men must be aware that to gossip or to darken another man's name or way will most certainly be accountable to Me. Each man is accountable for himself and will have to stand solely alone on the merits he earned walking the human role. Men who sin against this Rule will most likely sin against several of the others, for to bear false witness says ego, pride, jealousy, contempt, and a lack of self-discipline."
So, Mindia, you falsely accused me of being a liar. You've not given one shred of proof of your accusation, and indeed, you couldn't do so because I haven't lied, not once. Therefore, you have, in this thread, "darken another man's name", and have yet to apologize for doing so. Therefore, you have most assuredly joined the ranks of: "Men who sin against this Rule," as all can plainly see.
And amazingly enough, you certainly fit the description at the end of that, with your ego, jealousy, contempt and lack of self-discipline. You did, after all, as a condition of your banning being revoked, promise to stop making ad hominem attacks against people on this board. So far, at the very least, you've accused Gypsiee (a happily married woman) of being a slut, and me of being a liar, both accusations wildly untrue, and both breaking the rules YOU agreed to when you came back. That speaks to a definite lack of self-discipline, yes? I think we can ALL speak to your ego and contempt.
How's it feel having blatantly broken this rule, and then self-owned yourself by calling attention to it?
-Arlos
Arlos, you wouldn't know truth if it slapped you upside the head. Your sources of "facts" are from biased sources. Mine are not. You sound like such a fool. I'm happy for you that you've found peace in ignorance and foolery.
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Ugzugz wrote:Mindia wrote:Who says Jesus was married to Mary Magdelene?
... and you dare call OTHER people ostriches?
So answer the question rainman. Which Christian denominations believe that Mary Magdalene was married to Jesus?
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Mindia, my last post had *NOTHING* to do with the Bible arguments. Though, I do find it amusing that you're calling Wikipidia biased, since that's where I got most of my information. You really think that Wikipidia is part of some grand Catholic Underground network? Anyway, that's neither here nor there. My last post, which you obviously failed to read, has to do with YOU making unfounded accusations and ad hominem attacks against my, and other people's characters.
Now, some more facts, since apparently I have to repeat them:
1) You called ME a liar. You have yet to demonstrate, anywhere, in any way, where I personally lied, in any form. You have thus accused me of being dishonest, which I flatly reject, and take great offense to. Since you have no proof of this allegation, it's obvious you ARE making a false accusation, ie, BEARING FALSE WITNESS, or, as your quote puts it, you attempted to "darken another man's name".
2) You called Gypsiee a slut. Last I checked, she's happily married, and yes, sleeps with her husband. Explain to me how a married woman sleeping with her husband equates to being a slut? Isn't that the absolute OPPOSITE of being a slut? Thus, again, you have BOURN FALSE WITNESS against her.
Now, whether or not you have any issue with violated that particular commandment is on your own conscience.
Now, in neither case have you apologized, despite multiple calls on my part for you to do so. In BOTH cases, you have violated the rules YOU FUCKING AGREED TO when you were unbanned. I expect either a full apology and retraction, with an admission you were wrong and out of line, or I work full time on getting you banned again, which shouldn't be hard, since your breaking of the conditions set forth to you for unbanning are clear as day for all to see.
Which is it going to be, Mindia?
-Arlos
Now, some more facts, since apparently I have to repeat them:
1) You called ME a liar. You have yet to demonstrate, anywhere, in any way, where I personally lied, in any form. You have thus accused me of being dishonest, which I flatly reject, and take great offense to. Since you have no proof of this allegation, it's obvious you ARE making a false accusation, ie, BEARING FALSE WITNESS, or, as your quote puts it, you attempted to "darken another man's name".
2) You called Gypsiee a slut. Last I checked, she's happily married, and yes, sleeps with her husband. Explain to me how a married woman sleeping with her husband equates to being a slut? Isn't that the absolute OPPOSITE of being a slut? Thus, again, you have BOURN FALSE WITNESS against her.
Now, whether or not you have any issue with violated that particular commandment is on your own conscience.
Now, in neither case have you apologized, despite multiple calls on my part for you to do so. In BOTH cases, you have violated the rules YOU FUCKING AGREED TO when you were unbanned. I expect either a full apology and retraction, with an admission you were wrong and out of line, or I work full time on getting you banned again, which shouldn't be hard, since your breaking of the conditions set forth to you for unbanning are clear as day for all to see.
Which is it going to be, Mindia?
-Arlos
Last edited by Arlos on Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:23 pm, edited 3 times in total.