A good idea

Real Life Events.

Go off topic and I will break you!

Moderator: Dictators in Training

Post Reply
User avatar
Diekan
NT Deity
NT Deity
Posts: 5736
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am

A good idea

Post by Diekan »

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8064734/

I think that's a great idea, but how much do you wanna bet the porn industry will raise holy hell because it "violates" their First Amendment "rights?"
User avatar
Martrae
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
Posts: 11962
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:46 am
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Post by Martrae »

Good idea but I doubt many sites will switch since it costs more and they can't 'trap' you into going there.
Inside each person lives two wolves. One is loyal, kind, respectful, humble and open to the mystery of life. The other is greedy, jealous, hateful, afraid and blind to the wonders of life. They are in battle for your spirit. The one who wins is the one you feed.
User avatar
Gidan
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
Posts: 2892
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:01 am

Post by Gidan »

I highly doubt that they will pay more to be more controled. Think about it, would you pay more then somone else for the same product while at the same time making your product easier to be blocked from use?
For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.
Zanchief

Post by Zanchief »

Too me, you shouldn't get into censoring the internet in ANY way. Don't go if you don't want to be offended. It just seems like a real slippery slope(I know I sound like a conservative).

Maybe they should make a domain were people AREN'T aloud to put crap on it. Then they can censor the shit out of it and put a bunch of church group meet ups and shit.
dammuzis
NT Patron
NT Patron
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: my cubicle
Contact:

Post by dammuzis »

i see your poin zan, but conversely dont you think that a porn site with the url http://www.whitehouse.com should be allowed? (yes its no longer existant)
User avatar
Darcler
Saran Wrap Princess
Saran Wrap Princess
Posts: 7161
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by Darcler »

i remember typing that into the school computers when we were doing research on the electorial process during bush/gore. They didnt have the filters up for that one yet.
User avatar
Diekan
NT Deity
NT Deity
Posts: 5736
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am

Post by Diekan »

Zanchief wrote:Too me, you shouldn't get into censoring the internet in ANY way. Don't go if you don't want to be offended. It just seems like a real slippery slope(I know I sound like a conservative).

Maybe they should make a domain were people AREN'T aloud to put crap on it. Then they can censor the shit out of it and put a bunch of church group meet ups and shit.


I think part of the problem is that they intentionally misrepresent their URL's and or spam the shit out of you with pop up's if you happen across the wrong site by accident. As though you're suddenly going to pay for access to their site.

I like porn as much as the next guy, but when I am trying to do, or look for something in particular I don't want to see that shit.
Grymgroeth
NT Bixie
NT Bixie
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:31 am

Post by Grymgroeth »

From the article: "It will further help to protect kids," said John Morris, staff counsel at the Washington-based Center for Democracy and Technology.


Who the hell is this moron? Protect kids by gathering all the sites theyre trying to sneak onto into a convenient naming convention..... Yeah, makes good fucking sense to me. Here's a radical idea for all the bleeding ass liberals - instead of trying to "glass wall" the internet, develop a *mandatory* program that has to be completed to own a computer. Program would have "simple" shit like basic internet security, firewall filtering, spam blocking technology... ya know, how to use the internet like you have a fucking clue.
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Post by Harrison »

Yeah it worked out so well for driving vehicles as well!

Not to be a dick, but regulations do squat and we all know it. A dumbass with a license is no more qualified to drive than a 14 year old who has no license.

A dumbass is a dumbass.
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
User avatar
Captain Insano
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
Posts: 8368
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: SoCal

Re: A good idea

Post by Captain Insano »

Diekan wrote:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8064734/

I think that's a great idea, but how much do you wanna bet the porn industry will raise holy hell because it "violates" their First Amendment "rights?"



I think its a stupid fucking idea. Like parents need anymore help slacking off in their duties raising children.

If you don't want your kids surfing porn try being a parent for a fucking change or pop for a 99 dollar Norton Internet Security Suite. It takes about 2 mouseclicks to block 99.9 percent of all porn sites.
Tossica: No, you're gay because you suck on cocks.

Darcler:
Get rid of the pictures of the goofy looking white guy. That opens two right there.

Mazzletoffarado: That's me fucktard
Vivalicious wrote:Lots of females don't want you to put your penis in their mouths. Some prefer it in their ass.
Grymgroeth
NT Bixie
NT Bixie
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:31 am

Post by Grymgroeth »

Drivers license is an interesting comparison but I disagree on the effectiveness of a computer ownership program. Licensing has no true standard, the questions asked are of such a nature that any asstard with a 3rd grade education can answer them and unfortunately common sense goes completely to shit when most people close the car door. Given the prevalent threats of the internet (everything from spam to identity theft) a mandatory program would probably do wonders to curb the worst of the rampant stupidity on the web. Is the idea of parents actually knowing what their kids are doing really so frightening to so many people?
brinstar
Cat Crew
Cat Crew
Posts: 13142
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:45 pm
Location: 402

Post by brinstar »

Harrison wrote:Not to be a dick, but regulations do squat and we all know it. A dumbass with a license is more qualified to drive than a 20 year old who has no license.


i'm all for making driving tests much much harder

fewer people would earn licenses

which would cut down on necessary road maintenance and construction

which would free up public funding for more widespread mass transit programs

too stupid to get a license? no problem, get a 24/7 bus pass for $5 a month!

which is not even to mention the decreased exhaust emissions
compost the rich
User avatar
Jei
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: VA
Contact:

Post by Jei »

i like that idea actually
User avatar
Martrae
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
Posts: 11962
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:46 am
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Post by Martrae »

They really should raise the driving age to 18 at least. Too many kids get killed or kill someone else just because they are just too young and irresponsible.
Inside each person lives two wolves. One is loyal, kind, respectful, humble and open to the mystery of life. The other is greedy, jealous, hateful, afraid and blind to the wonders of life. They are in battle for your spirit. The one who wins is the one you feed.
User avatar
horendus
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
Posts: 1139
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 6:11 am
Location: FL
Contact:

Post by horendus »

The thing is, despite what people say - you can't globally regulate the intarweb, it easily evolves to move around regulations. Governments can somewhat control the flow of data into and out of their respective countries, but in the end if someone really wants something it doesn't take much (other than the know-how and sometimes the money) to get around it.

That said, providing "xxx" TLDs is a good idea - unfortunately i predict it will probably get used more by regular nerds that just want a hip new TLD for their domain. =p
<img src="http://images.station.sony.com/qfa/000/000/000/490.jpg">
<a href="http://eq2players.station.sony.com/en/pplayer.vm?characterId=115183108">Deykann Scalerot</a>
<a href="http://www.magelo.com/eq_view_profile.html?num=1091726" target="_blank">Horendus Gutwrencher</a> - Dark Knight of Cuteness
User avatar
Yamori
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
Posts: 2002
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:02 pm

Post by Yamori »

nm, misread.
Last edited by Yamori on Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
-Yamori
AKA ~~Baron Boshie of the Nameless~~
User avatar
Yamori
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
Posts: 2002
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:02 pm

Post by Yamori »

Btw, adding XXX domains seems pointless for the most part, as why would anyone pay more for no extra benefits --- aside from the very few who get key names (Sex.xxx ect) for extra traffic.
-Yamori
AKA ~~Baron Boshie of the Nameless~~
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Post by Lyion »

The problem is a simple matter of experience. A 17,18,19 year old guy has too much testosterone and too little driving experience.

The problem isn't the driving test, it's the people who do not comprehend they are driving a several thousand pound weapon at speeds that can easily kill.

Yeah, some adults drive stupidly, but once you've been driving for 20 years you understand driving and tend not to do the teenage things like stare at your radio or stop watching the road.

What's even scarier (or more darwin award material) are teenagers on crotch rockets.

I like .xxx but it'll never fly. Too easy for parents to block.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
Post Reply