God <3 Satanists (except fat ones)

Yamori · Post by **Yamori** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:02 pm

Lol, oh brinstar.

Foutty · Post by **Foutty** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:06 pm

I don't give a fuck what they do. It's one religion that peoople should not respect. As a Christian we are to respect other religions, but that is not one of them. They should be put to death just for what they believe in. Extreme u liberals say? U morons.

You sound like a very well adjusted member of society...no, really.

Markarado · Post by **Markarado** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:15 pm

Believing that stanism is ok is not adjusting to society, it's extreme liberalism.

mofish · Post by **mofish** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 9:25 pm

Markarado wrote:I don't give a fuck what they do. It's one religion that peoople should not respect. As a Christian we are to respect other religions, but that is not one of them. They should be put to death just for what they believe in. Extreme u liberals say? U morons.

You should be put to death.

Markarado · Post by **Markarado** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 9:30 pm

If you say so~

Tuggan · Post by **Tuggan** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:26 pm

fuckin' goddamn satan worshipping liberals. :darkangel:

Post by **Arlos** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:31 pm

We do, and our judgement is just as valid as yours, actually more valid, since there's more of us saying it about you.

What harm does it do to you, or anyone else, WHAT someone believes in, as long as what they're doing isn't causing harm to anyone?

Not that Anton LaVey isn't a loon, cause he is, but seems a pretty severe reaction from someone like Lyion, who has always claimed to be "Tolerant of all faiths".... Some tolerance, eh?

-Arlos

Markarado · Post by **Markarado** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:09 pm

Satanism is not a faith that calls for tolerism. It's simply wrong.

Post by **Arlos** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:34 pm

*shrug* There's lots of people that think Christianity is "simply wrong". I've heard *MANY* christians say that all other religions, or even other flavors of christianity are "wrong". That's just it, no faith is universally right, no faith is universally wrong, assuming that no one is committing harm on other people. (ie, sacrificing babies, etc.) It's all in what works for a given individual, even if what works best for them is no faith at all.

As I've said repeatedly: I couldn't begin to care less what faith someone is, as long as they keep it to themselves. It's when people try and legislate a faith, force it on others, or claim that faith is a substitute for science that I have an issue.

-Arlos

Witty · Post by **Witty** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:19 am

Wow you guys, I gotta dedicate one post here to quotes.

Arlos wrote:What harm does it do to you, or anyone else, WHAT someone believes in, as long as what they're doing isn't causing harm to anyone?

Yamori wrote:Thats just it though, it's not about being "Evil" - it's about showing that many things which have been considered evil for a thousand years are actually good things - mainly - questioning everything, selfishness, and hedonism. These are things that have been blamed on the devil - so I don't think it is an entirely illogical premise to build a quasi religion on that in response.

Harrison wrote:Yeah you fluffed that paragraph up with too much inane bullshit to be read with any sincerity.

Actually that was a pretty damn concise paragraph. I am trying to express my thoughts fairly delicately here, and without wasting 3 paragraphs of redundancies just so that I can avoid you saying such... so I am using the preview button. Please bear with me.

Yamori wrote:There really is no compact name for "rationally self interested humanist hedonists who perform occult rituals" aside from "Satanist

Foutty wrote:Church of Satan's brand of satanism, and what you see in the media are two different things.

I also suggest churchofsatan.com for a less aggressive view of Satanism.

Markarado wrote:Drel, you're not serious are you?

Not really, no. Sometimes things said in this forum strike a chord in me and it plagues my mind until I vomit it back to reshape it into some other digestible form. You always knew I am Athiest and still am. You should send me a PM sometime if you have a question about my beliefs before you outcast a friendship on such silliness.

mappatazee · Post by **mappatazee** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:43 am

Witty · Post by **Witty** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:46 am

ok, so... Outside of the Magick and Intolerance, I find Satanism to be a pretty apropriate & acceptable religion. It has a number of members who give it a bad name (like everything), but the Satanism suited for me is devoid of the qualities which would prompt someone to look upon a "Satanist" as a misguided teen and educate me how it's a mere social status symbol for shock value.

The 2 particular words I found to describe how I see a CoS would best function in my hedonistic views, which I mentioned, are concilation and eudemonism. To extol that and disregard magickal rites etc. would make for a strong church I think.

I had no idea how much The Devil's Notebook influenced me before re-reading it earlier this week. Within the 6 years it's been settling since my initial reading as a teen, I have found myself hesitantly agreeing with a huge percentage of it. This is shit I disregarded for the same reasons you all are claiming to. Yet somehow it imbedded itself as "logic" in my head.

And yes, Anton LaVey is a loon.

Jimmy Durante · Post by **Jimmy Durante** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:50 am

In addition to being a loon, the bulk of his "bible" is plagiarized.

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:02 am

brinstar wrote:
Yamori wrote:tell a person you're a satanist and see how they react--- if their reaction is immediately negative without any questions, they're probably very small minded.

Lyion wrote:Any smart, thoughtful person wouldn't give a proclaimed 'Satanist' the time of day.

Yamori wrote:tell a person you're a satanist and see how they react--- if their reaction is immediately negative without any questions, they're probably very small minded.

Lyion wrote:Any smart, thoughtful person wouldn't give a proclaimed 'Satanist' the time of day.

Yamori wrote:tell a person you're a satanist and see how they react--- if their reaction is immediately negative without any questions, they're probably very small minded.

Lyion wrote:Any smart, thoughtful person wouldn't give a proclaimed 'Satanist' the time of day.

That is of course if you're a fucking idiot and take the words of someone on a messageboard to be the model of which you base judgement on.

Oh....sorry Brinstar.

Captain Insano · Post by **Captain Insano** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:50 am

Satan's making me go to a strip club tonight with goosse.

Needless to say Jesus is furious about it.

Rust · Post by **Rust** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:02 pm

"The Bible, which is a very interesting and here and there very profound book when considered as one of the oldest surviving manifestations of human wisdom and fancy, expresses this truth very naively in its myth of original sin. Jehovah, who of all the good gods adored by men was certainly the most jealous, the most vain, the most ferocious, the most unjust, the most bloodthirsty, the most despotic, and the most hostile to human dignity and liberty - Jehovah had just created Adam and Eve, to satisfy we know not what caprice; no doubt to while away his time, which must weigh heavy on his hands in his eternal egoistic solitude, or that he might have some new slaves. He generously placed at their disposal the whole earth, with all its fruits and animals, and set but a single limit to this complete enjoyment. He expressly forbade them from touching the fruit of the tree of knowledge. He wished, therefore, that man, destitute of all understanding of himself, should remain an eternal beast, ever on all-fours before the eternal God, his creator and his master. But here steps in Satan, the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge." -- Mikhail Bakunin, God and the State

--R.

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:50 pm

brinstar · Post by **brinstar** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 4:27 pm

Harrison wrote:That is of course if you're a fucking idiot and take the words of someone on a messageboard to be the model of which you base judgement on.

Oh....sorry Brinstar.

do you try EXTRA HARD to be a retard? seriously, you are consistently the most idiotic poster around these days, and that's saying a LOT.

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 4:34 pm

You quoted 2 quotes over and over....and call me a retard?

You have real issues.

brinstar · Post by **brinstar** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 4:45 pm

hey i see you've kept your immaculate track record of idiocy intact

keep up the good work

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 4:51 pm

brinstar wrote:
Harrison wrote:That is of course if you're a fucking idiot and take the words of someone on a messageboard to be the model of which you base judgement on.

Oh....sorry Brinstar.

do you try EXTRA HARD to be a retard? seriously, you are consistently the most idiotic poster around these days, and that's saying a LOT.

You quoted 2 quotes over and over....and call me a retard?

You have real issues.

brinstar wrote:
Harrison wrote:That is of course if you're a fucking idiot and take the words of someone on a messageboard to be the model of which you base judgement on.

Oh....sorry Brinstar.

do you try EXTRA HARD to be a retard? seriously, you are consistently the most idiotic poster around these days, and that's saying a LOT.

You quoted 2 quotes over and over....and call me a retard?

You have real issues.

Narrock · Post by **Narrock** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:00 pm

hehe Harriwin :owned:

Binstart

Narrock · Post by **Narrock** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:01 pm

Rust wrote:"The Bible, which is a very interesting and here and there very profound book when considered as one of the oldest surviving manifestations of human wisdom and fancy, expresses this truth very naively in its myth of original sin. Jehovah, who of all the good gods adored by men was certainly the most jealous, the most vain, the most ferocious, the most unjust, the most bloodthirsty, the most despotic, and the most hostile to human dignity and liberty - Jehovah had just created Adam and Eve, to satisfy we know not what caprice; no doubt to while away his time, which must weigh heavy on his hands in his eternal egoistic solitude, or that he might have some new slaves. He generously placed at their disposal the whole earth, with all its fruits and animals, and set but a single limit to this complete enjoyment. He expressly forbade them from touching the fruit of the tree of knowledge. He wished, therefore, that man, destitute of all understanding of himself, should remain an eternal beast, ever on all-fours before the eternal God, his creator and his master. But here steps in Satan, the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge." -- Mikhail Bakunin, God and the State

--R.

That was seriously the dumbest and uninsightful thing I've read in a long time.

KILL · Post by **KILL** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:17 pm

Mindia wrote:
That was seriously the dumbest and uninsightful thing I've read in a long time.

quoted for funney

Narrock · Post by **Narrock** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:21 pm

KILL wrote:
Mindia wrote:
That was seriously the dumbest and uninsightful thing I've read in a long time.

quoted for funney

you are one unique individual, kill...