Abortion rate is lowest since 1976

Real Life Events.

Go off topic and I will break you!

Moderator: Dictators in Training

Abortion rate is lowest since 1976

Postby Phlegm » Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:47 am

An interesting article on abortion from the Washington Post:

WASHINGTON - A new analysis of the most recent abortion data shows that the number of U.S. women having the procedure is continuing its decade-long drop and stands at its lowest level since 1976.

In the year 2002, about 1.29 million women in the U.S. had abortions. In 1990, that number was 1.61 million.

The data, collected by the Alan Guttmacher Institute, a nonprofit group that collects information from abortion providers and public sources, show that for every 1,000 pregnancies that did not result in miscarriage in 2002, there were 242 abortions. This figure was 245 in 2000 and 280 in 1990. The institute's mission is to protect reproductive choice, but its reports are considered accurate across the political spectrum.

With President Bush preparing to nominate at least one new Supreme Court justice whose presence on the high court could produce new rulings on abortion, the data are already being interpreted differently by abortion rights advocates and antiabortion activists. But scientists say it is difficult to determine why the number of abortions has been dropping.

"There are so many things feeding into" the decline, said Lawrence Finer, associate director of domestic research at Guttmacher. Possible factors, he said, include changes in contraceptive technologies and use, changing ideas about family size and abortion, and reduced access to abortion services. Pregnancy clinics and abstinence programs may also have contributed to the declines, he said.

Who gets abortions?

Women with unintended pregnancies are those most likely to get abortions. According to the Guttmacher report, 47 percent of unintended pregnancies are aborted. Teenagers, unmarried women, black and Hispanic women, and those with low incomes are more likely than the population as a whole to have unintended pregnancies.


• Full health coverage

The report shows that non-Hispanic white women get about 40 percent of all U.S. abortions, black women 32 percent and Hispanic women, who can be of any race, 20 percent. Women of other races account for the other 8 percent. Black and Hispanic women have higher rates of abortion than non-Hispanic whites, the report states.

Other facts about U.S. abortions from the Guttmacher report:

Six in 10 women who had abortions in 2002 were mothers. "Despite the common belief, women who have abortions and those who have children are not two separate groups," said Finer.
A quarter of abortions occur among unmarried women who live with a male partner, putting this group at elevated risk of unintended pregnancy and abortion.
The majority -- 56 percent -- of women who terminate their pregnancies are in their twenties. Teenagers between 15 and 19 make up 19 percent of abortions, although this percentage has dropped substantially in recent years.
This drop may be due to use of longer-acting hormonal contraceptives and lower rates of sexual activity, said Joyce Abma, a social scientist at the National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

She added that there has been a decline in sexual activity reported by teenage males, which could be a contributing factor to lower pregnancy and abortion rates among teens.

The incidence of abortion spans the economic spectrum, but low-income women are overrepresented among those having the procedure. Sixty percent of women who had abortions in 2000 had incomes of less than twice the poverty level --below $28,000 per year for a family of three, for example. This is in part because "low-income women have lower access to family planning services" such as contraception and counseling provided by health departments, independent clinics or Planned Parenthood, Finer said.
Almost 90 percent of abortions are performed in the first trimester -- during the first 12 weeks after the first day of the woman's last menstrual period -- with most performed before nine weeks. Because of newer surgical and medical techniques, the proportion of abortions performed at six weeks or earlier has almost doubled in the past decade.
Less than 1 percent of abortions are done after 24 weeks.

The number of abortion providers declined by 11 percent between 1996 and 2000, to 1,800. In 2000, one-third of women aged 15 to 44 lived in a county that lacked an abortion provider.
About the data

There are two main sources of national data on abortion: the Guttmacher Institute and the CDC. While both are regarded as dependable by major groups on both sides of the abortion issue, their numbers are different, and less precise than some other health statistics.

Not all states require reporting of abortions. The District, Maryland, New Hampshire and New Jersey do not mandate abortion reporting. California does not collect abortion data at all. Alaska and New Hampshire have not released statistics since 1998. This affects CDC's data, which is assembled every year from reports received from state health departments.

Due to differing reporting requirements and data-gathering procedures, abortion information for the District, Maryland and Virginia does not permit meaningful comparisons.

Guttmacher produces its reports by contacting abortion providers nationwide; its reports are considered more comprehensive than the CDC's. But the institute publishes the data only every four or five years. Neither group has published data for years beyond 2002.

Despite the inconsistencies of methods, the trends reported by CDC and Guttmacher correspond closely to each other
Phlegm
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 6258
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:50 pm

Postby Lyion » Tue Jul 19, 2005 11:59 am

You're forgetting that some states, such as California won't release any abortion info so nobody really knows how many abortions are being performed.

If you take out a large chunk of the population quotient, of course the number of abortions will deteriorate regardless of the true facts.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Eziekial » Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:04 pm

How much of an increase do you think you would get from adding California? It's what? Only 10% of the population?
User avatar
Eziekial
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:43 pm
Location: Florida

Postby Narrock » Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:10 pm

They need to overturn Roe v. Wade.
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Narrock
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 16679
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Folsom, CA

Postby Tuggan » Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:29 pm

right, so more catholics can be denied the choice to adopt...but in your own little space cadet world its not a big deal cause a nice "christian" couple will come along 20 minutes later to pick the same children up.
Tuggan
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 3900
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 3:12 am
Location: Michigan

Postby Narrock » Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:38 pm

Catholics should be banned onto an island somewhere far away from us. That would actually solve a lot of problems.
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Narrock
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 16679
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Folsom, CA

Postby Lyion » Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:47 pm

Eziekial wrote:How much of an increase do you think you would get from adding California? It's what? Only 10% of the population?


California had 35 Million of the country's 290 Million.

The thing is, it is not the only state, so if 1/4 of the country doesnt report abortions and they decline by 10%, I personally wouldnt call it much of a gain.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Zanchief » Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:55 pm

But Lyion, how many people were using coat hangers in 76?
Zanchief

 

Postby xaoshaen » Tue Jul 19, 2005 2:10 pm

Eziekial wrote:How much of an increase do you think you would get from adding California? It's what? Only 10% of the population?


Yeah, but it's the liberal, tree-loving, pinko-commie, baby-killing 10%!
xaoshaen
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1378
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:00 am

Postby dammuzis » Tue Jul 19, 2005 2:53 pm

and they wont release how many people die a year due to complications from abortions
User avatar
dammuzis
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: my cubicle

Postby Wrath Child » Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:36 am

Zanchief wrote:But Lyion, how many people were using coat hangers in 76?


Anyone who used a coat hanger should have won a Darwin Award!
hntm s bac!
Wrath Child
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 3:57 pm

Postby Captain Insano » Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:02 am

Mindia wrote:Catholics should be banned onto an island somewhere far away from us. That would actually solve a lot of problems.



we can send the fagz their 2!~ lolZ


There are less abortions because more babies have their spines ripped out for stem cells mostly. Some are also used in cyborg experiments in area 51.
Tossica: No, you're gay because you suck on cocks.

Darcler:
Get rid of the pictures of the goofy looking white guy. That opens two right there.

Mazzletoffarado: That's me fucktard
Vivalicious wrote:Lots of females don't want you to put your penis in their mouths. Some prefer it in their ass.
User avatar
Captain Insano
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 8368
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: SoCal

Postby Jimmy Durante » Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:12 am

Captain_Insano wrote:Some are also used in cyborg experiments in area 51.


http://www.giger.com/FineArt/Originals/Originals11.jsp
Jimmy Durante
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1106
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 5:42 pm
Location: Otisburg

Postby Zormito » Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:28 am

lyion wrote:
The thing is, it is not the only state, so if 1/4 of the country doesnt report abortions and they decline by 10%, I personally wouldnt call it much of a gain.



If states don't report abortions now, they most likely didn't in the past. soooo the data pools, past and present, should be pretty similar. It should have no baring on the statistics, unless cali. and other non reporting states give out abortions as often as tiny american flags.
Zormito
NT Aviak
NT Aviak
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Ottawa

Postby Lyion » Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:01 am

Zormito wrote:
lyion wrote:
The thing is, it is not the only state, so if 1/4 of the country doesnt report abortions and they decline by 10%, I personally wouldnt call it much of a gain.



If states don't report abortions now, they most likely didn't in the past. soooo the data pools, past and present, should be pretty similar. It should have no baring on the statistics, unless cali. and other non reporting states give out abortions as often as tiny american flags.


Incorrect. States DID report abortion statistics in the past but do not now. Check the facts yourself.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio


Return to Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests