Oil prices hit 65/barrel

Real Life Events.

Go off topic and I will break you!

Moderator: Dictators in Training

Postby kaharthemad » Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:23 am

Gidan wrote:
Tuggan wrote:Would be pretty nice to have some moneys invested in oil right now, with all the new high price and demand still high. huh.


I bet Bush and Cheney couldn't be happier about their oil invesments.

Strange I dont remember the same3 being said during the Carter administration. Or was that because of the big mean Arabs that time? Or are most of you too young to remeber gas rationing?
Image
User avatar
kaharthemad
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 8:47 am
Location: Somewhere South of Disorder

Postby mofish » Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:35 am

I sure am glad I didnt listen to those recruiters in high school. Then it might be my dad asking Bush why he got me killed in a deceptive, meaningless war.

Remember kids. Do NOT join the armed forces!
You were right Tikker. We suck.
mofish
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 8:53 pm

Postby xaoshaen » Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:42 am

mofish wrote:I sure am glad I didnt listen to those recruiters in high school. Then it might be my dad asking Bush why he got me killed in a deceptive, meaningless war.

Remember kids. Do NOT join the armed forces!


Of course, FDR was pure and innocent leading America into World War 2. Democrats always tell their constituents the truth, and the armed forces are just pawns in a political game.

There are five lights!
xaoshaen
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1378
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:00 am

Postby mofish » Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:46 am

Hey look at that, a neo-con deflecting criticism of the current administration onto a democrat! What a new and interesting tactic!

I will give you props for going all the way back to FDR though. Its usually Clinton, and sometimes Carter, that is used.
You were right Tikker. We suck.
mofish
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 8:53 pm

Postby xaoshaen » Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:52 am

mofish wrote:Hey look at that, a neo-con


I'm not a neo-con

deflecting criticism of the current administration onto a democrat! What a new and interesting tactic!


I wasn't deflecting any critiscism, just pointing out your hypocrisy. Political partisans never cease to amaze me.
xaoshaen
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1378
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:00 am

Postby Minrott » Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:06 am

Everyone who is not a liberal, I'm sorry, a progressive is a "neo-con." Didn't you get the memo?
Molon Labe
User avatar
Minrott
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4480
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Postby Zanchief » Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:16 am

You two are as much Neo-Cons as I hate America.
Zanchief

 

Postby Rust » Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:18 am

Ugzug wrote:OPEC sets the price for oil... not the oil companies, not George Bush, and not Iraq.


OPEC sets the price of oil?

--R.
Rust Martialis -- Spiritwatcher of War/Valorguard/The Nameless

"There are angels on our curtains; they keep the outside out.
And there are lions on our curtains; they lick their wounds, they lick their doubt." -- 'Curtains', Peter Gabriel
Rust
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1127
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Postby Phlegm » Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:20 am

Rust wrote:
Ugzug wrote:OPEC sets the price for oil... not the oil companies, not George Bush, and not Iraq.


OPEC sets the price of oil?

--R.


in a way they do since they control the output of oil.
Phlegm
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 6258
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:50 pm

Postby Rust » Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:23 am

Phlegm wrote:
Rust wrote:
Ugzug wrote:OPEC sets the price for oil... not the oil companies, not George Bush, and not Iraq.


OPEC sets the price of oil?

--R.


in a way they do since they control the output of oil.


The quotas aren't always meticulously followed, you know.

--R.
Rust Martialis -- Spiritwatcher of War/Valorguard/The Nameless

"There are angels on our curtains; they keep the outside out.
And there are lions on our curtains; they lick their wounds, they lick their doubt." -- 'Curtains', Peter Gabriel
Rust
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1127
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Postby Phlegm » Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:29 am

Rust wrote:
Phlegm wrote:
Rust wrote:
Ugzug wrote:OPEC sets the price for oil... not the oil companies, not George Bush, and not Iraq.


OPEC sets the price of oil?

--R.


in a way they do since they control the output of oil.


The quotas aren't always meticulously followed, you know.

--R.


Whether or not the quotas strictly enforced, the price of oil is still dependent on what OPEC does.
Phlegm
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 6258
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:50 pm

Postby Martrae » Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:42 am

Hmmm....trust in the UN that's right now being investigated for supplying items to Iraq in return for oil despite the embargo.

I'll have to think about that one!
Inside each person lives two wolves. One is loyal, kind, respectful, humble and open to the mystery of life. The other is greedy, jealous, hateful, afraid and blind to the wonders of life. They are in battle for your spirit. The one who wins is the one you feed.
User avatar
Martrae
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 11962
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:46 am
Location: Georgia

Postby Phlegm » Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:50 am

Martrae wrote:Hmmm....trust in the UN that's right now being investigated for supplying items to Iraq in return for oil despite the embargo.

I'll have to think about that one!


If it's the oil for food program, the UN is investigating the reported bribes and kickbacks that some of the high ranking officials were getting from companies wanting to participate in the program.
Phlegm
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 6258
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:50 pm

Postby Rust » Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:55 am

Martrae wrote:Hmmm....trust in the UN that's right now being investigated for supplying items to Iraq in return for oil despite the embargo.

I'll have to think about that one!


Oh, the leaky embargo the US knew all about?

--R.
Rust Martialis -- Spiritwatcher of War/Valorguard/The Nameless

"There are angels on our curtains; they keep the outside out.
And there are lions on our curtains; they lick their wounds, they lick their doubt." -- 'Curtains', Peter Gabriel
Rust
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1127
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Postby Eziekial » Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:28 pm

I am sure we sent a memo to the UN about it, and I bet it was a nasty memo at that.
User avatar
Eziekial
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:43 pm
Location: Florida

Postby Rust » Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:29 pm

Eziekial wrote:I am sure we sent a memo to the UN about it, and I bet it was a nasty memo at that.


No, when it was Turkey and Jordan raking in cash from Oil-for-Food deals, the US was all in favor of that part.

--R.
Rust Martialis -- Spiritwatcher of War/Valorguard/The Nameless

"There are angels on our curtains; they keep the outside out.
And there are lions on our curtains; they lick their wounds, they lick their doubt." -- 'Curtains', Peter Gabriel
Rust
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1127
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Postby Alyn » Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:41 pm

Alyn wrote:
Oil Companies pass on all costs to the consumer and are cleaning up in the current market. Take one look at Oil company stocks and you will see they are all way up.

The Bush Admin did not plan for Iraq to be less functional after the war than before it. They predicted Iraq Oil would pay for the whole clean up so the US taxpayers wouldn't have to.

Point is if things had gone according to the plans Bush had there would be a lot more oil coming out of Iraq. So they planned to lower oil prices they just failed to get the job done.


OPEC sets the price for oil... not the oil companies, not George Bush, and not Iraq.

Really - the ignorance and conspiracy theories just need to stop... it's getting ridiculous.


What conspiracy theory?

The Bushies said the war would pay for itself by pumping oil out of Iraq. More supply lower prices.

“Iraq, unlike Afghanistan, is a rather wealthy country. Iraq has tremendous resources that belong to the Iraqi people. And so there are a variety of means that Iraq has to be able to shoulder much of the burden for their own reconstruction.” – White House Spokesman Ari Fleischer, 2/18/03

“The oil revenues of Iraq could bring between $50 and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years…We're dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon.” – Paul Wolfowitz, [Congressional Testimony, 3/27/03]



If the US controlled wells in Iraq were pumping oil prices would come down and we wouldn't be paying for the damn reconstruction. (ok we aren't paying for it we are borrowing it but someday we will pay for it)

That's what they were planning on. That's what they told us.

OPEC influneces oil prices they don't control them. They control supply of some of the countries pumping oil. Often members cheat and over produce and some oil is produced by non OPEC countries.
Alyn
NT Aviak
NT Aviak
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 8:50 am

Postby Minrott » Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:50 pm

I'm a neo-con like Canada is a tropical resort.
Molon Labe
User avatar
Minrott
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4480
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Postby Parv » Fri Aug 12, 2005 8:20 pm

I pay about $50/month for my gas in my personal truck - God bless working for an oil service company that gave me a company vehicle and pays for the gas.

OPEC doesn't set prices. They only control production from their member nations. It's the speculators in the market and China/India's growth that are raising prices of oil. By the way most of our foreign oil comes from Canada and Venezuela - Middle East contributes reletively little.

Companies are posting record profits mainly because they're not investing that money into new projects. We're mostly scared of the bottom falling out like in the mid-80's, and don't want to be sitting on a ton of useless and costly infrastructure when it happens. It's been nearly 20 years since the industry has moved at the pace it's at now, and it's unsure how to proceed. My company just posted record sales and profits last quarter, but we did not expect it since our goal was about 20% lower. It screws things up because we're now wondering where we went wrong in our planning. Could we have invested more in designing and promoting a certain tool? Could we have hired more people to expand, or open more facilities? These things take time, and there's a gunshyness going around with the oldtimers (average age of people in the industry is over 50) about expanding and using our resources in new projects since they don't want to be left holding the bag. Looking at operators the situation is the same - they're just now beginning to look at exploration of new fields, GoM and North Sea will be getting a new start hopefully in the next few years. When it's a given that a new field will take several years of development before the first drop is produced though, companies are still playing it cautiously.

Personally, I say throw that money into better recovery methods, even if it's a loss initially. I'm all for moving ahead and displacing the risk-aversion that I see everyday and investing the money into long term projects. Yeah, we'll run out for all practical purposes someday. Rather than pissing and moaning though I'm working towards postponing that date. Hopefully we'll have adjusted our lifestyles and find practical alternative energy sources by then.
Parv
NT Aviak
NT Aviak
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 8:45 am

Postby Gaazy » Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:01 pm

we are at about 2.50, my new truck has a 26 gallon tank, sigh


what size tank is on yours Lyion?
User avatar
Gaazy
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 5837
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:32 am
Location: West by god Virginia

Postby Lyion » Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:10 pm

Parv wrote:
OPEC doesn't set prices. They only control production from their member nations. It's the speculators in the market and China/India's growth that are raising prices of oil. By the way most of our foreign oil comes from Canada and Venezuela - Middle East contributes reletively little.
.


I think your analysis is spot on, Parv, and you obviously know the industry, but I would argue the price is set by OPEC and their charges.

OPECS basket price is currently 58.28. I'd think that is setting worldwide prices a tad higher than when it was 25.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Themosticles » Mon Aug 15, 2005 1:35 pm

Never fear...Problem Solved!

WASHINGTON, DC—President Bush unveiled an aggressive initiative Monday that would make the U.S. free of petroleum dependence by the year 4920, less than three millennia from now.

"Our mission is clear," Bush said in a speech delivered at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. "We must free ourselves from dependence on fossil fuels within 85 generations. A cleaner, safer America is my vision. And it is our great, great—great-times-80 grandchildren who will realize that vision."

Bush promised a legislative package that would mandate severe cuts in oil-production subsidies and provide new funding for alternative-energy research and development. According to the timetable he presented, these bills could be introduced as early as 3219, and U.S. energy consumers could start to see radical changes by the early 42nd century.

"If we don't end our dependence on oil by 4920, when will we end it? 5580? By then, it may be too late," Bush said.

Bush called on both Democrats and Republicans living 1,200 years from now to work together to pass the program.

"It would be a shame if, by the 33rd century, these bills were still tied up in committee. I urge the 712th Congress to pass this legislation with minimal partisan gridlock," Bush said.

The president's science advisor, John Marburger, provided more details of the energy plan in a press release issued late Monday.

"It is the president's hope that hydrogen fuel cells, nanotechnology, or the recycling of human beings into fuel will hold the key," Marburger wrote. "Whatever the people of the 50th century feel is appropriate."

In a detailed policy statement, Bush elaborated on the plan, expressing the hope that a third party, perhaps one comprising robots or super-intelligent, genetically engineered man-beasts, will help reduce America's dependence on fossil fuels.

"I am calling on the popularly elected cyborgs of tomorrow to support this sensible measure to ensure the security of the nation," Bush said.

Some industrialists, particularly major auto manufacturers, expressed reservation over Bush's initiative.

"As admirable as Mr. Bush's visionary pronouncement is, I worry that the timetable he proposes is far too ambitious," General Motors CEO Richard Wagoner Jr. said. "It is simply not realistic. The automotive industry would require an additional three or four thousand years to develop engines that can run effectively on renewable or cleaner-burning fuels."

Exxon Mobil CEO Lee Raymond said the petroleum-producing company shares Bush's hopes for a cleaner environment "well before the sun turns into a red giant and dies."

"Mobil Oil has already made great strides in protecting the precious air and water within the television-commercial environment. And we plan to golf closely with the U.S. Department of Energy and oil-industry lobbyists to ensure that President Bush's initiative comes to pass in the unimaginably distant future."

Responding to reporters' questions, Bush admitted that our progeny could face challenges in pursuit of the goal, such as the earth's degrading orbit and eventual destruction of the moon by tidal force, or the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

"Our distant relations will have some hard work to do," Bush said. "But hard work is what built this nation, and I have every faith that they will succeed."

The proclamation comes on the heels of Bush's plans to pay off the national debt by the early 6300s, and win the war on terror by 7450.


Article Found Here
"The war in Afghanistan is over." — Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
User avatar
Themosticles
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 12:50 pm
Location: Denver, Co

Postby Lyion » Mon Aug 15, 2005 2:39 pm

Gaazy wrote:we are at about 2.50, my new truck has a 26 gallon tank, sigh


what size tank is on yours Lyion?


Same. Over 60 dollars to fill up my truck today.. Ow, ow, Fking Ow.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Lyion » Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:16 pm

Just to spread the love, because I'm in a foul mood.. Here's state gas prices by grade

State Regular Mid Premium Diesel
Alaska $2.521 $2.669 $2.821 $2.552
Alabama $2.448 $2.617 $2.695 $2.478
Arkansas $2.436 $2.570 $2.733 $2.482
Arizona $2.535 $2.644 $2.796 $2.794
California $2.765 $2.943 $2.992 $3.129
Colorado $2.475 $2.647 $2.766 $2.598
Connecticut $2.563 $2.782 $2.855 $2.705
District of Columbia $2.631 $2.802 $2.886 $2.669
Delaware $2.559 $2.718 $2.838 $2.573
Florida $2.532 $2.743 $2.793 $2.583
Georgia $2.489 $2.676 $2.794 $2.477
Hawaii $2.740 $2.898 $2.952 $2.933
Iowa $2.446 $2.575 $2.698 $2.494
Idaho $2.449 $2.585 $2.656 $2.734
Illinois $2.627 $2.826 $2.914 $2.652
Indiana $2.536 $2.729 $2.806 $2.541
Kansas $2.500 $2.567 $2.667 $2.552
Kentucky $2.478 $2.658 $2.778 $2.449
Louisiana $2.432 $2.592 $2.713 $2.475
Massachusetts $2.547 $2.739 $2.843 $2.616
Maryland $2.582 $2.746 $2.815 $2.582
Maine $2.497 $2.694 $2.769 $2.563
Michigan $2.590 $2.742 $2.853 $2.601
Minnesota $2.480 $2.579 $2.646 $2.506
Missouri $2.444 $2.543 $2.692 $2.443
Mississippi $2.442 $2.576 $2.692 $2.454
Montana $2.439 $2.543 $2.666 $2.648
North Carolina $2.487 $2.639 $2.755 $2.504
North Dakota $2.522 $2.609 $2.703 $2.553
Nebraska $2.550 $2.607 $2.680 $2.553
New Hampshire $2.483 $2.689 $2.785 $2.550
New Jersey $2.463 $2.640 $2.740 $2.475
New Mexico $2.555 $2.721 $2.839 $2.597
Nevada $2.666 $2.810 $2.913 $2.901
New York $2.594 $2.775 $2.834 $2.725
Ohio $2.506 $2.673 $2.780 $2.568
Oklahoma $2.421 $2.503 $2.643 $2.422
Oregon $2.595 $2.738 $2.778 $2.818
Pennsylvania $2.507 $2.643 $2.760 $2.636
Rhode Island $2.596 $2.762 $2.853 $2.643
South Carolina $2.398 $2.550 $2.673 $2.423
South Dakota $2.545 $2.708 $2.819 $2.536
Tennessee $2.430 $2.573 $2.696 $2.433
Texas $2.477 $2.620 $2.714 $2.474
Utah $2.397 $2.528 $2.638 $2.724
Virginia $2.476 $2.598 $2.697 $2.474
Vermont $2.443 $2.628 $2.742 $2.634
Washington $2.642 $2.737 $2.873 $2.849
Wisconsin $2.594 $2.693 $2.817 $2.588
West Virginia $2.545 $2.661 $2.794 $2.579
Wyoming $2.377 $2.478 $2.640 $2.547

http://www.fuelgaugereport.com/sbsavg.asp
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Previous

Return to Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests