namelesstavern.net

by **Samboa** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:15 pm

The new M5's are expected to be in North America late 2005. PS. That stock M5 that ran the 12.8 had 394 horsepower and 368ft-lbs of torque. The new M5 has 500hp and 383ft-lbs of torque. So basically, it's going to run significantly faster than the 2002.

by **Tacks** » Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:36 am

What don't you understand about they've already done test runs? The numbers are right there.

by **Samboa** » Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:33 pm

Are you kidding me? What don't you understand? This is a luxury sedan with 5 seats that is going to give a high-end sports car with 2 seats some pretty serious competition. Oh, and have you been able to find any exact numbers for the 2005 M5? Because I sure haven't.

And in 2002, when the M5 was most recently released, it would in mocst cases beat a 2002 vette.

by **Tacks** » Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:51 pm

I JUST POSTED THE NUMBERS How many times more do I need to say it? here read this part once again

THEY HAVE TESTED AND COMPARED THE 2006 Z06 AND THE 2006 M5 What more do you want? I don't care if the thing had 50 seats, your arguement was that it would beat a corvette...it will not. Period end of story, goodnight.

by **PunePosse** » Thu Aug 18, 2005 4:14 pm

1966' Buick Riviera

I would post pic if i wasn't noob at HTML!~ GG
So here's the link!~

http://www.oldride.com/displayAd.html?sectionID=1&ViewItem=1837&ADVSearch=adv

by **Captain Insano** » Thu Aug 18, 2005 11:36 pm

Samboa wrote:Are you kidding me? What don't you understand? This is a luxury sedan with 5 seats that is going to give a high-end sports car with 2 seats some pretty serious competition. Oh, and have you been able to find any exact numbers for the 2005 M5? Because I sure haven't.

And in 2002, when the M5 was most recently released, it would in mocst cases beat a 2002 vette.

jesus fucking christ!

You and reading comprehension mix like black people and working for a living....

Read taxx's post rhinocerusballs.

by **Captain Insano** » Thu Aug 18, 2005 11:37 pm

PunePosse wrote:1966' Buick Riviera

I would post pic if i wasn't noob at HTML!~ GG
So here's the link!~

http://www.oldride.com/displayAd.html?sectionID=1&ViewItem=1837&ADVSearch=adv

are you mentally retarded seriously? I think the internet is way above your paygrade. Logoff life plz!1 ~ GG

by **Samboa** » Sun Aug 21, 2005 8:34 pm

.7 seconds difference. At the drags, .7 can easily be added on a bad run. Put an M5 against a Z06 on the street and I bet you the Z06 wouldn't win every time.

by **Lyion** » Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:49 pm

This owns an M5 in the most important space. It compensates for just about anything.

by **Captain Insano** » Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:50 pm

man that thing looks sweet!

by **mofish** » Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:39 pm

Captain_Insano wrote:rhinocerusballs.

I need to stop eating while i read the nt or im gonna choke to death. Laughing while eating is bad.

by **Narrock** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:41 am

I'm not a GM fanboi, but that Vette is pretty sweet...

by **Jimmy Durante** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:52 am

I've wrote this before in another thread, but the Vette has it's own dedicated team of engineers and really shouldn't be associated with other GM vehicular masterpieces.

And I agree, that Vette is volcanic.

by **kaharthemad** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:27 am

Yup my nipples are hard.

by **Tacks** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:56 am

Samboa wrote:.7 seconds difference. At the drags, .7 can easily be added on a bad run. Put an M5 against a Z06 on the street and I bet you the Z06 wouldn't win every time.

Wow you really ARE that stupid aren't you? Now you're comparing the fucking drivers of the cars...HELLO?

by **Arlos** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:46 pm

I'm not a vette fan either, normally, and I still probably would never buy one, even if I could afford it, but I too have to admit that he latest one looks pretty damn sweet.

-Arlos

by **Samboa** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:58 pm

A car isn't going to run 11.9, 11.9, 11.9, 11.9, 11.9 every damn time.

by **Narrock** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:59 pm

What the hell is that Vette doing parked in front of some ghetto-ass building? Looks like a chop-shop.

by **optimoz** » Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:10 pm

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/522069

by **labbats** » Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:16 pm

Tacks wrote:
Samboa wrote:.7 seconds difference. At the drags, .7 can easily be added on a bad run. Put an M5 against a Z06 on the street and I bet you the Z06 wouldn't win every time.

Wow you really ARE that stupid aren't you? Now you're comparing the fucking drivers of the cars...HELLO?

Taxx, unless you bold some letters, I can't follow you. At least you're still capping letters to simulate yelling. Kudos, my friend. Kudos.

by **DESX** » Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:54 pm

0-60 in 5 sec's isnt to bad for volvo S60R

by **DESX** » Sat Sep 10, 2005 10:04 pm

Ok ok far-fetched as hell but we can all dream that we might one day be able to own an 806 horse power car.

by **optimoz** » Sat Sep 10, 2005 10:35 pm

Fuck a volvo, fuck a vette. Cobra > vette

by **DESX** » Sat Sep 10, 2005 10:49 pm

optimoz wrote:Fuck a volvo, fuck a vette. Cobra > vette

Must agree with you actually.... especially if it's a fucking cobra with a damn turbine in it that I saw a few days ago.

by **Captain Insano** » Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:34 am

DESX wrote:
0-60 in 5 sec's isnt to bad for volvo S60R

LOL... soccer mom watches Fast and Furious ONE to many times and BAM! RICERVOLVO

namelesstavern.net

Post your dream car that is not too far-fetched

Who is online