Moderator: Dictators in Training
"Jared's off the diet?!" a California woman said incredulously. "It's suicide for me!"
Zanchief wrote:Kizzy wrote:Those carbon based date testers are hardly accurate.
Actually, they are pretty accurate, Kizz.
Mindia wrote:I was wrong obviously.
kaharthemad wrote:Carbon dating is rather a subject that I dont understand fully. Can someone give a brief touch up. My field is in Military hardware and nerd shit like computers.
From what I gather it is the measuring of rate of absorbtion of atoms on a radioactive bombarded organic item. If someone can elaborate I would apreciate.
Langston wrote:Let's just say for a moment, that the carbon dating was 50% wrong. A FULL 50% off the mark.
That would make the fossil *ONLY* 500,000 years old.
See any difference in the basic premise of the article? Cuz I don't.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
Zanchief wrote:Well the popular belief (amongst morons) is that carbon dating is inaccurate, not wrong. So assuming that carbon dating is 50% inaccurate (which it isn’t) than the nothing has changed in the article.
IE Mindia is a douche.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 5 guests