If you play a Warrior...

Insanityfair · Post by **Insanityfair** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:25 am

Problem was you pretty much did make it sound like you were taking aggro, and were out aggroing the paladin. You didn't clarify your story by saying he wasn't the tank, just saying that you were doing more damage. So I wouldn't call it a mis read. You stated your opinion on ST citing an example. I merely stated what I saw wrong with the situation, as that was my opinion because I play a priest and I don't like people out aggroing a tank, which was what it looked like you were doing, and a caster is generally far squishier than a tank, unless the tank sucks.

The Kizzy · Post by **The Kizzy** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:36 am

Thanks for your opinion

Insanityfair · Post by **Insanityfair** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:42 am

The feeling is mutual.

Tikker · Post by **Tikker** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:48 am

I know how to use italics too!

The Kizzy · Post by **The Kizzy** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:49 am

But, can you BOLD????

Tacks · Post by **Tacks** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:52 am

Hurry change the subject before more pwnage occurs~

Darcler · Post by **Darcler** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:53 am

AoE, sheep, paladin, mana shield.

Continue.

The Kizzy · Post by **The Kizzy** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:54 am

I'm used to you and your e-friends berating me in and out of game. Someone has to be the grown up though, so I will just continue to do that. Good day to you sir.

Tacks · Post by **Tacks** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:57 am

Ok name ONE of my "e-friends" who has said ONE WORD to you in game. If ANYONE has said ANYTHING to you in game I want to know about it. I think you're full of shit. 99% of the people I talk to now don't have a clue who you are.

Explain how disagreeing with an opinion (one in which you yourself admit you typed incorrectly even!) is even remotely close to "berating" you. If you really want me to berate you about it I can work something out.

The Kizzy · Post by **The Kizzy** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:59 am

Tacks · Post by **Tacks** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:02 am

Yeah, I figured you were full of shit.

The Kizzy · Post by **The Kizzy** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:04 am

No, not full of shit, just not going to let you enjoy luring me into a fight on the internet.

Tacks · Post by **Tacks** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:05 am

Fine we can talk about it in PM's like adults then.

Zanchief · Post by **Zanchief** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:06 am

Taxx wrote:Fine we can talk about it in PM's like adults then.

I think it's too late for that.

Tacks · Post by **Tacks** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:06 am

The Kizzy · Post by **The Kizzy** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:12 am

Zanchief wrote:
Taxx wrote:Fine we can talk about it in PM's like adults then.

I think it's too late for that.

Yeppers.

Insanityfair · Post by **Insanityfair** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:12 am

For the record, my comment had nothing to do with who you are, if you meant that at me. If you did not mean that to me, my apology in advance. I only commented on what you said in your post, which was referring to skill/character etc. You were seemingly snide to me in regards to what you admitted was somewhat a mistype on your part, and thanked me for my opinion. I didn't find that very grown up.

The Kizzy · Post by **The Kizzy** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:22 am

Taxx wrote:Fine we can talk about it in PM's like adults then.

From our PM's:

Taxx wrote:Way to dodge the subject you stupid fucking cunt.

Way to be adult.

Tacks · Post by **Tacks** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:24 am

Taxx wrote:Way to dodge the subject you stupid fucking cunt.

And you just dodged the post right above yours.

Darcler · Post by **Darcler** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:30 am

You know, for not letting him drag you into an e-fight, you sure are responding in a condesending tone very often. I think you are e-fighting. Taxx took the high(er?) road and sent PMs. Though as juvenile as they were, you brought this thing back out into public. Unlike "adults".

I'm sure you have said time and time again to Mindia, as I have as well, to let this shit just roll off your back. Who cares what people on the INTERNET say? You have you opinion, they have theirs, if they start name calling, be an adult and ignore them. You know just as well as everyone else here that Taxx is a troll, he gets his rocks off by people getting flustered at what he says. You seem flustered.

That took for fucking ever, kidlet likes going to the front door after I tell her no

xaoshaen · Post by **xaoshaen** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:36 am

Insanityfair wrote:Problem was you pretty much did make it sound like you were taking aggro, and were out aggroing the paladin. You didn't clarify your story by saying he wasn't the tank, just saying that you were doing more damage. So I wouldn't call it a mis read. You stated your opinion on ST citing an example. I merely stated what I saw wrong with the situation, as that was my opinion because I play a priest and I don't like people out aggroing a tank, which was what it looked like you were doing, and a caster is generally far squishier than a tank, unless the tank sucks.

If a mage doesn't draw aggro in ST, they're not doing their job. No tank in the game can keep up with the aggro AE generates on a half dozen mobs. If you're not using AE in ST, you needn't bother bringing a mage along as they have mediocre single-target DPS and offer little crowd control there.

The Kizzy · Post by **The Kizzy** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:38 am

Thanks, Xao.

Tacks · Post by **Tacks** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:46 am

xaoshaen wrote:If a mage doesn't draw aggro in ST, they're not doing their job. No tank in the game can keep up with the aggro AE generates on a half dozen mobs. If you're not using AE in ST, you needn't bother bringing a mage along as they have mediocre single-target DPS and offer little crowd control there.

Zanchief did just fine holding agro when we went there so I guess you're wrong. As long as you have a competant healer, tank, and you assist well then others aren't going to get agro.

Zanchief · Post by **Zanchief** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:49 am

He's talking about the AE areas, Kezz. Which I couldn't hold agro on cause Skrum would constantly whine about me sundering ALL the mobs we were AEing, and I was like, yea I don't think so.

Good times.

Insanityfair · Post by **Insanityfair** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:50 am

xaoshaen wrote:
Insanityfair wrote:Problem was you pretty much did make it sound like you were taking aggro, and were out aggroing the paladin. You didn't clarify your story by saying he wasn't the tank, just saying that you were doing more damage. So I wouldn't call it a mis read. You stated your opinion on ST citing an example. I merely stated what I saw wrong with the situation, as that was my opinion because I play a priest and I don't like people out aggroing a tank, which was what it looked like you were doing, and a caster is generally far squishier than a tank, unless the tank sucks.

If a mage doesn't draw aggro in ST, they're not doing their job. No tank in the game can keep up with the aggro AE generates on a half dozen mobs. If you're not using AE in ST, you needn't bother bringing a mage along as they have mediocre single-target DPS and offer little crowd control there.

Perhaps, but in general, the tanks still should be trying (again I said trying) to keep aggro. There seemed to be quite a few holes in that story. There were other questions that seemed to be left unanswered to me also, like was the paladin supposed to be healing at the time? If so, why did he care about the his vs. hers ae factor? And if there was a priest, I would assume they did shackle and ae breaks shackle...but again, this whole thread turned away from the point of the dungeon and got kind of snide as I said above, which was why I stopped commenting. And Zan, you were still holding aggro very well in Strat over the warlock in ae areas.