Bush takes responsibility for failures after Katrina

Real Life Events.

Go off topic and I will break you!

Moderator: Dictators in Training

Post Reply
User avatar
Phlegm
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
Posts: 6258
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:50 pm

Bush takes responsibility for failures after Katrina

Post by Phlegm »

From CNN:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush said Tuesday he takes responsibility for the federal government's failures in responding to Hurricane Katrina.

"Katrina exposed serious problems in our response capability at all levels of government and to the extent the federal government didn't fully do its job right, I take responsibility," Bush said during a joint news conference with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani.

Earlier in the day, the White House said the president will address the nation Thursday night about the Hurricane Katrina disaster.

The 9 p.m. ET address is the latest administration reaction to Katrina, which roared ashore on August 29, flooding most of New Orleans and forcing evacuations across much of the Gulf Coast.

"The president will talk to the American people about the recovery and the way forward on the longer-term rebuilding," White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters, according to Reuters.

Bush is expected to make his address from storm-wracked Louisiana, where the president toured damaged New Orleans neighborhoods on Monday.

News of Bush's televised address comes a day after the resignation of Federal Emergency Management Agency Director Mike Brown, who quit after questions were raised about his qualifications and for what critics call a bungled response to Katrina's destruction.

Bush chose David Paulison, director of FEMA's preparedness division, as interim director.

Paulison said Tuesday he planned to focus on getting people out of shelters "and into some type of either semi-permanent or permanent housing."

Speaking at a news conference, he also pledged to help victims by working with state and local officials.

"This has to be a partnership, because ultimately the communities are entitled to take responsibility and empower themselves," Paulison said.

Paulison, who is also administrator for the U.S. Fire Administration, was a former fire chief in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Brown's resignation came three days after Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff recalled him to Washington and replaced him as point man for Katrina relief efforts.

Since then, Vice Adm. Thad Allen, the Coast Guard's chief of staff, has been leading FEMA's mission along the Gulf Coast.

Chertoff said he expects to make other appointments to FEMA in coming days, "including a permanent deputy director to augment the resources available to assist with FEMA's vital mission."

Asked Monday about the resignation as he toured the devastated city of Gulfport, Mississippi, Bush said he had not talked with Chertoff and could not comment.

Brown's fall came quickly. On September 2, Bush told the 50-year-old lawyer, "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job."

Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Massachusetts, applauded the latest development. "I think it is clearly in the country's interest," Kennedy said.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said he was not surprised.

"Things didn't go as well as it should have," said the Tennessee Republican. But Frist added, "Now, I am very pleased where we are."
Tuggan
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
Posts: 3900
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 3:12 am
Location: Michigan

Post by Tuggan »

well thats definately a first.
User avatar
Langston
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
Posts: 7491
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 4:07 pm

Post by Langston »

I like seeing this kind of stuff.

Reagan, I believe, was the last President that stood up and said that he took responsibility for the government's failings. It's a rare person that takes their responsibilities so seriously.
Mindia wrote:I was wrong obviously.
User avatar
kaharthemad
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 8:47 am
Location: Somewhere South of Disorder

Post by kaharthemad »

can you hear the jackals calling for impeachments?
Image
User avatar
Phlegm
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
Posts: 6258
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:50 pm

Post by Phlegm »

kaharthemad wrote:can you hear the jackals calling for impeachments?


then Cheney would be president
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Post by Harrison »

That's a scary thought
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
User avatar
Tacks
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 16393
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:18 pm
Location: PA

Post by Tacks »

Newsflash, Bush admits to being a moron, something most of the nation knew already.
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Post by Harrison »

Newsflash:

Bush took responsibility for something largely out of his control.

Morons cry "Told you so"
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
brinstar
Cat Crew
Cat Crew
Posts: 13142
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:45 pm
Location: 402

Post by brinstar »

Harrison wrote:That's a scary thought


i agree!

cold calculating evil is always scarier than idiotic bumbling evil ;)
compost the rich
User avatar
leah
Preggers!
Preggers!
Posts: 6815
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: nebraska
Contact:

Post by leah »

well at any rate, being impeached =/= being thrown from office (clinton, duh) so i think we'd pry be okay..
lolz
Zanchief

Post by Zanchief »

Of all things to admit he's wrong about...
User avatar
Kaeerwen
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
Posts: 1103
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 10:35 am
Location: cardboard box in your backyard

Post by Kaeerwen »

brinstar wrote:cold calculating evil is always scarier than idiotic bumbling evil ;)


Seconded. Also lol.
"Jared's off the diet?!" a California woman said incredulously. "It's suicide for me!"
User avatar
Gidan
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
Posts: 2892
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:01 am

Post by Gidan »

Even if he desirved to be impeached, which he doesn't in any way. In this country or partasin polotics it would never happen. Republicans out number Democrats in the house and the votes would never be there regardless of what the representatives actually thought. Just look at the clinton impeachment, how many people actually voted against party lines? Those few who did I have great respect for however because they were not bullied by their party to vote a specific way, they viewed that facts and made a decision.
For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.
Post Reply