Texas - new BCS #1

Tacks · Post by **Tacks** » Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:50 am

The bowl games get the schools WAY too much money to do away with them without a bunch of drama.

xaoshaen · Post by **xaoshaen** » Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:55 am

Tacks wrote:The bowl games get the schools WAY too much money to do away with them without a bunch of drama.

You could replace the bowl income with playoff income, if you handled it correctly.

Tacks · Post by **Tacks** » Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:56 am

The problem is the sponsers. Every sponsor wants to be THE big game and they will all pay for it.

xaoshaen · Post by **xaoshaen** » Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:01 am

Tacks wrote:The problem is the sponsers. Every sponsor wants to be THE big game and they will all pay for it.

You can still have sponsorships for playoff games.

Phlegm · Post by **Phlegm** » Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:29 pm

I think if you going to have a playoff system then only the conference winners should get in. You win your conference.... you're in. No arguments ... no controversy... no dependence on polls.

Tacks · Post by **Tacks** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:38 am

So who is the Big East going to play? The BCS is going to have a realignment in 2007.

It's a fucking farce that Rutgers or Pittsburgh will get a BCS bid because they win the Big East. West Virginia is the only team in that division thats even ranked. We could see UCLA and Oregon with 1 loss and not get a BCS bid.

Phlegm · Post by **Phlegm** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:15 am

Tacks wrote:So who is the Big East going to play? The BCS is going to have a realignment in 2007.

It's a fucking farce that Rutgers or Pittsburgh will get a BCS bid because they win the Big East. West Virginia is the only team in that division thats even ranked. We could see UCLA and Oregon with 1 loss and not get a BCS bid.

Last year Cal had only one loss(to USC) and didnt go to a BCS bowl. The people around here were whining their asses off until Texas Tech kicked Cal's ass in one of the bowl. Shut those fucking whiners off quick.