But it is biologically wrong to do that with someone of the same gender! It offers nothing to society or procreation. When a man and man or woman and woman have a sexual relationship there is no child production. Child production is the main biological reason for sexual intercoarse, yes?
So, by your logic, anyone who's sterile, either because of the result of disease or because they had it done deliberately, shouldn't be having sex either, huh? And the ONLY time you EVER have sex is when you're trying to have a kid?
Somehow, I don't think so, in which case: STFU hypocrite.
-Arlos
..Worst counter-statement ever.
It never ceases to amaze me that you people try that each and every time.
Next you'll note how "homosexual behavior" is present in more than just humans, therefor making it natural
You can't expect people to be tolerant of a culture that screams bloody murder for things most people accept as a good solid ribbing. People make fun of bald people, fat people, dumb people, goofy people, < insert group here >. That's life. You can get a sense of humor about life, or alternatively, you can scream homophobe and sue everyone. The course of action seems to be following the latter. If that's the case, homosexual prejudice will only get worse, as more and more people become pissed off at the double standard that arises (see racial threads).
As an example:
My girlfriend's brother and wife decided to have a party at their house for some reason. A few people there started trashing the house a little bit, basically acting all wild like normal partygoers. A few people also happened to be making out on their couch. My girlfriend's brother and wife obviously didn't want their house trashed, and people feeling each other up on their furniture, and told them. Their response: OMGZBBQ HOMOPHOBE, followed by a heated exchange between some guy and my girlfriend's brother's wife. When my girlfriend's brother intervened, he pinned the guy against the wall and was about to beat the shit out of him, but didn't. The guy was gay. He knew he'd be sued, called more epithets like homophobe, sexist, or arrested as a hate crime/gay basher. If the guy was a heterosexual he would have gotten his ass beat right there, but he didn't. It's wrong.
Also as another devil's advocate point of view, I'm interested since I used to discuss this question with other people:
If all of the human population of the world engaged in < insert whatever here >, which resulted in the eventual annihilation/extinction of the human species, is it an acceptable behavior?
This of course could be anything, but in this case it'd be homosexuality.
You could argue that the world could all be homosexual, but with modern science, you could in-vitro everyone that wanted kids. But that's a very recent discovery, and if everyone was homosexual 100 years ago that point would be moot.
You could also argue that people could just have a single heterosexual encounter solely for procreation. This would be more along the lines of where I would probably argue it, although if you're having heterosexual sex you're not fully homosexual. I couldn't get aroused for another man, even if it meant having a child, for example, because I'm heterosexual.
It's interesting to discuss I think. The problem comes when you can't talk about it at all for fear of being labeled homophobe, like what has already occured in this thread.
Please explain to me why if you're born with a twitchy leg - you have "restless leg syndrome." If you do this or that - you have this or that "syndrome." But, if you're a dude who likes to snack on cock - you're normal. LOL.
BTW Arlos should stick to what he knows best - which isn't biology.
Sex is a means to reproduce - if you really think it evolved to serve as a form of entertainment you're a moron. Society has turned into that. Everyone likes sex - but let's not pretend that it's nature's way of saying, "have fun!"
A man and woman getting it on is normal - it IS what nature intended despite it's use for simple pleasure. A man playing pitcher and catcher with his buddy is NOT normal.
Diekan wrote:BTW Arlos should stick to what he knows best - which isn't biology.
Sex is a means to reproduce - if you really think it evolved to serve as a form of entertainment you're a moron. Society has turned into that. Everyone likes sex - but let's not pretend that it's nature's way of saying, "have fun!"
A man and woman getting it on is normal - it IS what nature intended despite it's use for simple pleasure. A man playing pitcher and catcher with his buddy is NOT normal.
Who gives a shit? Half the stuff we do to get off isn't natural. Point being peopled only make a stink about the gay stuff. Why don't you devote as much time to writing up an essay on how unnatural blow jobs are?
Zan just because you smoke sausage with your gay ass french candaian fagbois does not mean everyone here
A)should be Subjected to it on a daily basis.
B) Wants to raise their kids telling them it is ok
C) believes that a childrens game should be choked full of "Zanchief swallows" conversations in a guild that he might inadvertantly sign up with.
kaharthemad wrote:Zan just because you smoke sausage with your gay ass french candaian fagbois does not mean everyone here A)should be Subjected to it on a daily basis. B) Wants to raise their kids telling them it is ok C) believes that a childrens game should be choked full of "Zanchief swallows" conversations in a guild that he might inadvertantly sign up with.
Man you should have heard some of the hetero smut that used to be said in the Nameless guild. I was sooo afraid of the children that might have potentially heard it.
I wouldn’t want to go into your closet, Kahar. Is this all some deep repressed memory of a night you just couldn’t score enough cash for a fix that you had to go the extra mile?
Diekan wrote:BTW Arlos should stick to what he knows best - which isn't biology.
Sex is a means to reproduce - if you really think it evolved to serve as a form of entertainment you're a moron. Society has turned into that. Everyone likes sex - but let's not pretend that it's nature's way of saying, "have fun!"
A man and woman getting it on is normal - it IS what nature intended despite it's use for simple pleasure. A man playing pitcher and catcher with his buddy is NOT normal.
In that case, I sure hope you don't like fucking a girl in the ass, either - I can conclude from a majority of posts by male members of this board that most do - that's as unnatural as what gay men partake in - you sure aren't getting any babies out of colonjizz, so what's the logic about being au natural there?
"I think you may be confusing government running amok with government doing stuff you don't like. See, you're in the minority now. It's supposed to taste like a shit taco." - Jon Stewart
Diekan wrote:BTW Arlos should stick to what he knows best - which isn't biology.
Sex is a means to reproduce - if you really think it evolved to serve as a form of entertainment you're a moron. Society has turned into that. Everyone likes sex - but let's not pretend that it's nature's way of saying, "have fun!"
A man and woman getting it on is normal - it IS what nature intended despite it's use for simple pleasure. A man playing pitcher and catcher with his buddy is NOT normal.
In that case, I sure hope you don't like fucking a girl in the ass, either - I can conclude from a majority of posts by male members of this board that most do - that's as unnatural as what gay men partake in - you sure aren't getting any babies out of colonjizz, so what's the logic about being au natural there?
It's tight and also it does produce children. They just get dropped off at the pool and never get seen again =P
What some of you aren't understanding is that I'm not saying you can't be gay. Like I've said several times - if you're gay - be gay. Just stop flaunting it and making it a point to cram it in everyone's face.
Also, just because Ben and Jerry stopped making your favorite flavor of ice cream doesn't mean there's some evil religious republican conspiracy to "get you." If you get turned down for a job, it's probably because you weren't qualified - not because you're gay.
Stop using the fact you're gay as crutch and an excuse every time something doesn't go your way. Stop making it a point to show the whole world how gay you are. Stop calling yourself a minority - lifestyle choices are not grounds for minority status.
And no, nailing some chick in the ass isn't anymore natural than singing karaoki with your buddies meat rod. They are societal constructs, not products of biological evolution. But, if that's YOUR thing - than have at it. Personally, I've never had a desire to do a chick in the ass - that comes with being big enough to get satisfied with vaginal sex I guess.
blowjobs are the most natural way to get a women to STFU and everyone knows they are always talking about stupid shit that no one wants to actually hear.
I mean what women wants to chit chat about the most recent hair products after she just got done choking for 10 minutes and has an eyeful of splooge?
Tossica: No, you're gay because you suck on cocks.
Darcler:
Get rid of the pictures of the goofy looking white guy. That opens two right there.
Mazzletoffarado: That's me fucktard
Vivalicious wrote:Lots of females don't want you to put your penis in their mouths. Some prefer it in their ass.
Diekan wrote:What some of you aren't understanding is that I'm not saying you can't be gay. Like I've said several times - if you're gay - be gay. Just stop flaunting it and making it a point to cram it in everyone's face.
and that's all good and well; but at the same token, stop flaunting your love of boobies and a tight ass in my face.
"I think you may be confusing government running amok with government doing stuff you don't like. See, you're in the minority now. It's supposed to taste like a shit taco." - Jon Stewart
Personally, I've never had a desire to do a chick in the ass - that comes with being big enough to get satisfied with vaginal sex I guess.
Some chicks get off on it and say the orgasms are different. I like to be a complete lover. if there's a different way to get a girl off, I want to employ it and see what happens.
Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.
Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
captain_insano wrote:I mean what women wants to chit chat about the most recent hair products after she just got done choking for 10 minutes and has an eyeful of splooge?
If she is getting an eyeful of splooge, most likely she would get some on her hair also. Therefore, she will talk about the most recent hair products that get rid of splooge.
kaharthemad wrote:Zan just because you smoke sausage with your gay ass french candaian fagbois does not mean everyone here A)should be Subjected to it on a daily basis. B) Wants to raise their kids telling them it is ok C) believes that a childrens game should be choked full of "Zanchief swallows" conversations in a guild that he might inadvertantly sign up with.
Youre a dipshit, like most of the guys posting in this thread.
Subjected to it on a daily basis? Do you hang out with Diekan at The Rawhide? The only thing Im subjected to on a daily basis are the intolerant assholes screaming about how wrong homosexuality is.
How about a little less ranting on the internet and a little more 'Mind Your Own Fucking Business' mixed in with a dash of 'I Accept That People Arent All Alike And Its OK'?
But it is biologically wrong to do that with someone of the same gender! It offers nothing to society or procreation. When a man and man or woman and woman have a sexual relationship there is no child production. Child production is the main biological reason for sexual intercoarse, yes?
So, by your logic, anyone who's sterile, either because of the result of disease or because they had it done deliberately, shouldn't be having sex either, huh? And the ONLY time you EVER have sex is when you're trying to have a kid?
Somehow, I don't think so, in which case: STFU hypocrite.
-Arlos
I don't believe that I ever said you shouldn't have sex for the sheer pleasure of it. What I was stating is that the basic act of sexual intercoarse is to create offspring. That can only be accomplished sexually with a man and a woman. Correct? You with me so far? Now, since the act of sex is biologically created for a man and a woman, people who deviate from that are sexual deviants. Still with me? As I see it, it is the norm for a man to penetrate a woman. To penetrate a man is abnormal. It just isn't what nature intended.
Hypocrite? Not me. I have sex the way sex was intended to be had. With a woman because I am a man.
But it is biologically wrong to do that with someone of the same gender! It offers nothing to society or procreation. When a man and man or woman and woman have a sexual relationship there is no child production. Child production is the main biological reason for sexual intercoarse, yes?
So, by your logic, anyone who's sterile, either because of the result of disease or because they had it done deliberately, shouldn't be having sex either, huh? And the ONLY time you EVER have sex is when you're trying to have a kid?
Somehow, I don't think so, in which case: STFU hypocrite.
-Arlos
I don't believe that I ever said you shouldn't have sex for the sheer pleasure of it. What I was stating is that the basic act of sexual intercoarse is to create offspring. That can only be accomplished sexually with a man and a woman. Correct? You with me so far? Now, since the act of sex is biologically created for a man and a woman, people who deviate from that are sexual deviants. Still with me? As I see it, it is the norm for a man to penetrate a woman. To penetrate a man is abnormal. It just isn't what nature intended.
Hypocrite? Not me. I have sex the way sex was intended to be had. With a woman because I am a man.
My official statement on this matter is: Love whoever the hell you want. As long as it is consensual and doesn't involve children or animals, I am totally cool with it.
Donnel wrote:
Erodalak wrote:Who needs an education when you are hawt like advina