Orgasm in a bottle?

Ginzburgh · Post by **Ginzburgh** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:23 pm

I also find that younger girls (pre 25) are more self conscious and are lamer in bed than the older girls (25+) who are more comfortable with their bodies and are more free-wheeling in bed.

ClakarEQ · Post by **ClakarEQ** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:32 pm

I can't comment since I'm loyal to my lady and now considered "old" (37) but to me it seems the young ladies today are more outgoing then some of the more resevered older ones.

I don't recall a lot of girls doing blow jobs, anal, etc at the age they do the shit now. I've got two boys and I can't wait for the stories they'll tell me when they're, hmm 10 LOL (seriously kidding of course, they'll be 12 or 13 before they get laid at todays rate, ok bad joke still, I hope they're 15-18 before they go there).

Ginzburgh · Post by **Ginzburgh** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:34 pm

I can't comment since I'm loyal to my lady and now considered "old" (37) but to me it seems the young ladies today are more outgoing then some of the more resevered older ones.

Don't be fooled, they just dress that way.

Tikker · Post by **Tikker** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:38 pm

it's not that more women now do oral/anal/whatever

it's just that more of them are willing to admit it now

Post by **Martrae** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:47 pm

Tikker wrote:it's not that more women now do oral/anal/whatever

it's just that more of them are willing to admit it now

Ginzburgh · Post by **Ginzburgh** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:55 pm

I've only had one girl that did anal and every girl I have ever gone out with has done oral and swallowed.

Alot of the "self conscious" ones I referred too in an earlier post would get to sex and only do it in one or two positions because they thought their asses were too big or what have you.

Like only "laying on back" and "on top". Never "doggy style", never "laying on side", never "on top of the guy reverse", never "on back with legs up".

"Missionary" and "girl on top" gets boring after awhile.

Giggity goo.

Post by **DangerPaul** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:29 pm

Ginzburgh wrote:I also find that younger girls (pre 25) are more self conscious and are lamer in bed than the older girls (25+) who are more comfortable with their bodies and are more free-wheeling in bed.

QFT

Also, I have my own orgasm maker, it is called my finger, tongue or on rare occasion my dick. Only time the women doesn't get off, is because I really don't give a shit about her

Prior to my recent love failure, Tiffany usually got an average of 5 orgasms before me. One night she lost count at 34, man, I need to meet another woman so easy to get off... where is Crielle? :devil2:

Post by **DangerPaul** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:31 pm

Ginzburgh wrote:I've only had one girl that did anal and every girl I have ever gone out with has done oral and swallowed.

Alot of the "self conscious" ones I referred too in an earlier post would get to sex and only do it in one or two positions because they thought their asses were too big or what have you.

Like only "laying on back" and "on top". Never "doggy style", never "laying on side", never "on top of the guy reverse", never "on back with legs up".

"Missionary" and "girl on top" gets boring after awhile.

Giggity goo.

I have noticed a huge upswing of women into anal but a depressing lack of women who swallow. I don't think I have been with a swallower in the last 4 years :cry:

Ginzburgh · Post by **Ginzburgh** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:38 pm

That's wild man. Must be different region of the country thing.

All the girls here swallow. A couple girlfriends ago she grimaced every time she swallowed and I said, "hey why do you do it if it tastes so bad?" and she she said, "because it's rude to not swallow"

Fuckin a right.

Ginzburgh · Post by **Ginzburgh** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:39 pm

The best is when they swallow but instead of your dick being totally in their mouth they open their mouth wide and rest it on their tongue so you can see it shooting in.

Post by **DangerPaul** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:02 pm

want to trade houses for a month? tired of anal and miss swallowers

I have almost 4000 sq ft finished space with a 40x40 theater with 18 speaker surround and 102" projection !

Insanityfair · Post by **Insanityfair** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:06 pm

DangerPaul wrote:I have noticed a huge upswing of women into anal but a depressing lack of women who swallow. I don't think I have been with a swallower in the last 4 years

ClakarEQ · Post by **ClakarEQ** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:12 pm

That last post Ginz was TMI LOL.

And DP, 34 times, I'm not saying it isn't possible but even my first wife who was 10' squirter couldn't get off 34 times, she'd turn into a raisin(sp).

I could see 34 minor little oooo's ahhhhh's that's it, but 34 full blown O's, naw, I can't belive that one /snicker

Shannan · Post by **Shannan** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:05 pm

DangerPaul wrote:I have noticed a huge upswing of women into anal but a depressing lack of women who swallow. I don't think I have been with a swallower in the last 4 years

LIES! I just hadnt exercised that ability, haha.

Post by **DangerPaul** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:26 pm

yeah, whose fault was that again? i know i sure tried

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:28 pm

Captain Insano · Post by **Captain Insano** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:56 pm

Agrajag wrote:
Tacks wrote:LOL, you suck at sex then. It's your job to do whatever you have to do to get her there. If you can't then maybe...well sounds like a personal problem!

Sex advice from you, Tacks? Laughable to say the least. You disappointed so badly that your last woman moved out of the state. I won't even bother defending myself against you, Jared.

Oh, by the way, congratulations on biting on that joke, Captain Obvious. What a dumbass you are sometimes. I thought you knew how to troll. How to pick and chose? I guess you ran out of good material. Maybe if you try harder someone will like you.

I didn't bite on anything Lieutenant Dong-Tonsils. I didn't even click on that click...I'm just here taking the thread in a more important direction...ie: Mine.

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 5:07 pm

Careful Ralf, never get inbetween two faggots fighting.

Ginzburgh · Post by **Ginzburgh** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 5:23 pm

want to trade houses for a month? tired of anal and miss swallowers smile

I have almost 4000 sq ft finished space with a 40x40 theater with 18 speaker surround and 102" projection !

I live in a three bedroom apartment that's probably the size of your bathroom. I have a 27inch trinitron with no surround sound and you can't cook here because the fire alarm goes off in my building when you do so much as preheat my oven over 300 degrees.

On the positive side, I live above an oriental spa which is usually frequented by 60+ year old drunk men that vomit in the alley right below my bedroom window after their visit.

Let me know when you want to make the switch.

Jay · Post by **Jay** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 5:32 pm

I'll switch with you. The plumbing in my house is completely fucked. Everytime I need to take a shit I have to drive down the road to Safeway and use theirs and I have to ninja foot over to the bushes to take a piss in the middle of the night. I wake up early in the morning so I can go to my gym just to shower. Hopefully that nightmare will be over next week though. Till then the place is all yours Ginz.

Ginzburgh · Post by **Ginzburgh** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 5:34 pm

Just remember, you're not poor, you're just living the bohemian lifestyle.

Minrott · Post by **Minrott** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 5:36 pm

Women can have what? Eh whocares.

Jay · Post by **Jay** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 5:38 pm

Not poor, just chose to invest into something that will require a lot of fixing up. Hopefully I'll make it back and then some when I sell this place one day. I will say it's in a nice neighborhood, great view of the hills and non existant crime rate.

Ginzburgh · Post by **Ginzburgh** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 5:41 pm

I can't buy a house in a decent neighborhood around here until I can spend at least $350,000. And that $350k will buy me a 1700 square foot home on 1/4 acre of property.

Minrott · Post by **Minrott** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 5:49 pm

lol that's insane. For $350,000 here I could build a brand new 2,500 square foot home with outbuildings on 80-120 acres of wooded land.