Harrison wrote:You can't make blanket statements about human beings and their emotions.
You did.
Moderator: Dictators in Training
Tossica wrote:There are natural ways to promote neurotransmitter production. If the "brain is not producing enough serotonin" it's usually because of a psychological rut the person is in. Are there some people with actual physical brain damage? Of course... meth, xtc, xanax, etc abuse can all cause permanant brain damage which may cause your brain to physically not be able to produce the right combination of neurotransmitters to make you feel "happy" but for the most part, people that are chronically unhappy due to tragic circumstances in their life have all the tools they need to "correct" their unhappiness.
Harrison wrote:Wow, I didn't know so many people were this clueless about chronic depression.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:Wow, I didn't know so many people were this clueless about chronic depression.
And where exactly does your wealth of knowledge come from cranberry boy?
Harrison wrote:They say depression is a chemical imbalance in the brain, and sure, it is, but you can change that chemical imbalance just by eating healthier, or exercising, or changing your environment.
Wrong.
Yamori wrote:Harrison wrote:They say depression is a chemical imbalance in the brain, and sure, it is, but you can change that chemical imbalance just by eating healthier, or exercising, or changing your environment.
Wrong.
I think the word 'just' is what makes this wrong.
There is no way that exercising, eating right, and getting more sun alone are going to cure serious clinical depression.
Can it help people who feel pretty crappy or lousy (especially if influenced from external rather than internal factors)? Sure, probably.
Can it make a little difference in worse cases? Maybe.
Can it shift the chemical imbalance in someone who is at suicidal risk and cant get themselves to get out of bed, let alone go to work or do much of anything to serious levels? Uh, no.
Diabetes is caused by a lack of production of a vital chemical
I know, Clakar WAY the fuck out in left field again. But if you truly think about that, does it not make "some" sense?
Phlegm wrote:Tikker wrote:it's been pretty much accepted for a long time that it was genetic
Tell that to the religious zealots.
Sorina S wrote:I completely disagree that homosexuality is genetic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests