refused to join the effort in Iraq, believing that jihadists would honor such fine distinctions
I don't think he really knows the first thing about Canada, or the Canadian political climate. He must have read a couple editorials and decided to write this piece of crap
I like Lyion's absolute hypocrisy with his article postings. If I (or anyone else) were to post an article from MoveOn, George Soros, Air America, or any other outlet as unabashedly liberal as the National Review is unabashedly rabidly right-wing, he'd attempt to verbally tear us a new one. Look at all of his previous posts of disdain about MoveOn and suchlike. Yet he feels no qualms about quoting sources equally as rabid on his side of the political spectrum.
Aye, Cap'n, the Hypocrisy-ometer is readin offa the charts! The message boards, they cannot take much more a this egocentric overload!
So Zanchief, can you disprove some of the assertions and allegations the author made? Or is the extent of your rebuttal going to be limited to profoundly insightful comments such as, "the author has no factual basis?" Just curious.
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Mindia wrote:So Zanchief, can you disprove some of the assertions and allegations the author made? Or is the extent of your rebuttal going to be limited to profoundly insightful comments such as, "the author has no factual basis?" Just curious.
I didn't say "the author has no factual basis", because that doesn't make sense. I said his assumptions have no factual basis. It's pretty clear if you read it. I don't know what else you'd like me to say.
Last edited by Zanchief on Fri Jun 09, 2006 11:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Because they show that large industiralized nations can be liberal and still be successful, so it ruins his argument against liberalism in the united states.
Mindia wrote:So Zanchief, can you disprove some of the assertions and allegations the author made? Or is the extent of your rebuttal going to be limited to profoundly insightful comments such as, "the author has no factual basis?" Just curious.
I didn't say "the author has no factual basis", because that doesn't make sense. I said his assumptions have no factual basis. It's pretty clear if you read it. I don't know what else you'd like me to say.
In other words you have no solid rebuttal. Ok then.
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Mindia wrote:So Zanchief, can you disprove some of the assertions and allegations the author made? Or is the extent of your rebuttal going to be limited to profoundly insightful comments such as, "the author has no factual basis?" Just curious.
I didn't say "the author has no factual basis", because that doesn't make sense. I said his assumptions have no factual basis. It's pretty clear if you read it. I don't know what else you'd like me to say.
In other words you have no solid rebuttal. Ok then.
people who rely on "goddidit" don't ever get to complain about anyone else's rebuttal quality
Hey, Canadians make some killer chocolate too. Stay away from Canuck choco factories.