My guild vs naxx video

Mudcrush Durtfeet · Post by **Mudcrush Durtfeet** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:52 pm

What not to do in Naxx.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 1410&hl=en

ybik gnome · Post by **ybik gnome** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 1:39 pm

Figured Mudcrush would play ezmode alliance.

Gargamellow · Post by **Gargamellow** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:09 pm

[smiley poster=grins]<3 Mudcrush[/smiley]

Tuggan · Post by **Tuggan** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:29 pm

my server must sux, cause horde dominate for the most part :-x

mofish · Post by **mofish** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:05 pm

ybik gnome wrote:ezmode alliance.

Horde cries cries cries. Why do you guys cry so much?

Ive got some horde alts on a pvp server. And its the same thing there, ezmode this ezmode that alliance whaahh cry cry cry :cry:

Tikker · Post by **Tikker** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:33 pm

play both to 60 and you'll understand

Biph_Dawgy · Post by **Biph_Dawgy** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:37 pm

Hey mudcrush you play on cenarius, i had acouple of mid level characters there, was apart of Pirate before they started raiding real hard.

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:02 pm

mofish wrote:
ybik gnome wrote:ezmode alliance.

Horde cries cries cries. Why do you guys cry so much?

Ive got some horde alts on a pvp server. And its the same thing there, ezmode this ezmode that alliance whaahh cry cry cry

It's probably more balanced out now but, it used to be hugely disproportionate content-wise.

Horde side felt "half done" throughout the progression of leveling.

Post by **Mop** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 10:05 pm

it still does, tho with expansion all the horde crying bout pali's can stop.

Gargamellow · Post by **Gargamellow** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 10:08 pm

If I ever played WoW..I would want to be evil. IS that what Horde is? Evil races?

Ya...I would.

Darcler · Post by **Darcler** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 10:16 pm

Gargamellow · Post by **Gargamellow** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 10:22 pm

hmm well I don't klnow then. If I can't be evil..then fuck it.

warcraft 3 is much funner anyway...at least my minions actually listen instead of dicking around organizing their bags or chatting with the latest cyberslut

I could be done with online gaming.

Zanchief · Post by **Zanchief** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:36 am

Horde isn't evil. Horde is like the free thinking liberals and alliance is like the fear mongering imperialist republicans.

ybik gnome · Post by **ybik gnome** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:12 am

Tikker wrote:play both to 60 and you'll understand

Correct.

Dont mean to pinch nerves here, since apparently Im crying, but some classes make a huge difference.

Id post a huge drawn out number crunch on how 4 paladins do more for the raid, and how it would need 8+ shamans to 1/2 of what they could. I will say though once horde gets paladin, I think the PVE edge will tip due to tauren now being a semi better tank, esp with orcs racial being nerfed a bit.

Guild has recently done some rebuilding so were going back through MC with alts and shit, and oh how I miss fear ward for the lazy ass tanks who dont want to stance dance.

If your referring to AV, for Pvp, and horde is winning, you have some shitty ass alliance players. We have people in our BG group now, dont even cap FW anymore, they just send 40 ppl strong back to our relief hut and take it in 5 minutes. I mean who the fuck designed AV....

Burgy99 · Post by **Burgy99** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:32 pm

Horde is as close to evil as you can get Garg

Atleast theres ogres, undead, trolls, and cow people...

I've never played an alliance character, but my friends that do have alliance alts all tell me theres like hundreds of more quest for them, and the quests are more thought out at that.

And, AV has been nerfed so many times its no longer fun. It's not even PVP anymore, its a PVE race to the opposing factions boss mob. They were awesome when they were still 15 hour epic battles that you stayed in to see who wins just out of principle.

Mudcrush Durtfeet · Post by **Mudcrush Durtfeet** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:08 pm

I've played horde to 58, I saw pretty much as many quests for them as for alliance. They tend to get better rewards too.

The 'horde side is less developed' thing is a myth from beta, when they WERE unfinshed etc etc. Right now nothing could be further from the case.

Horde (at least while leveling) have a MUCH better flight point network and zepp placement beats crap out of boat placement.

Raiding wise, well, yes. Pallys > shaman. /comfort

Zanchief · Post by **Zanchief** » Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:10 am

Mudcrush Durtfeet wrote:I've played horde to 58, I saw pretty much as many quests for them as for alliance. They tend to get better rewards too.

The 'horde side is less developed' thing is a myth from beta, when they WERE unfinshed etc etc. Right now nothing could be further from the case.

Horde (at least while leveling) have a MUCH better flight point network and zepp placement beats crap out of boat placement.

Raiding wise, well, yes. Pallys > shaman. /comfort

Now that's true but the game was live for about a year and a half before they added the extra horde FP to balance it out.

KaiineTN · Post by **KaiineTN** » Sat Oct 28, 2006 11:22 pm

I leveled a druid to 60 on Horde and had an easier time and more fun in the process than when leveling my rogue to 60 on Alliance. /shrug

10sun · Post by **10sun** » Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:07 am

KaiineTN wrote:I leveled a druid to 60 on Horde and had an easier time and more fun in the process than when leveling my rogue to 60 on Alliance. /shrug

Thats because druids are EZ mode OMG!

-Adam

ps. try leveling up a warrior on both sides. I'd imagine that horde warriors have it easier to be quite honest.

ybik gnome · Post by **ybik gnome** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:16 am

Undead warriors rock on downtime...Cannablism + most humanoids earlier on for horde side(least undead) which rocks for bandages/pure cash drops.

Hell an undead lock is quite a ez lvl up, grinding on humanoids.

Menlaan · Post by **Menlaan** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:00 am

I'm a relative newbie to WoW and have effortlessly leveled my undead shadow priest to 42 so far while playing VERY casually (though I'm usually rested which makes xp incredible when I do play). I've mostly solo-quested, but I've done a fair number of elite quests and instance runs with PUGs. I like the undead quests I've done, though I'm having a good time in Stranglethorn now.

Tikker · Post by **Tikker** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:01 am

who has a more interesting raiding role, druid, or shaman?

Post by **Arlos** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:37 am

As I understand it, both of them have pretty much the same raid role as the paladin: Healbot, with occasional slight modifications. Druids, you get to ennervate people. Shamen, you drop totems as they expire. Paladins, we cleanse a lot.

That's pretty much it...

-Arlos

KaiineTN · Post by **KaiineTN** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:08 pm

I'd drop my rogue in an instant and never look back if I could play a feral druid in a raiding guild.

ybik gnome · Post by **ybik gnome** » Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:12 am

Since we've backed out of nax(only downed anub so far), due to the expansion coming out and not wanting to spend 50+ gold a night on repair bills, we've let a majority of the guild respec. We still run the lower dungeons, although not as efficently.

Have some feral druids who tank, and actually tank better then some warriors.
Had 3 shadow priest + shaman in MT group on onyxia, and didnt even need to throw out heals with all the Vampiric embrace going around.