<i>Giuliani is a Roman Catholic who is pro-choice, favors same-sex civil unions, gun control, and embryonic stem-cell research. Pro-life groups, such as the Republican National Coalition for Life, have already announced their intention to oppose Giuliani or any other pro-choice candidate,[43] though evidence suggests that even among these voters, he enjoys some support.</i>
1. You hate Catholics
2. You are Pro-Life
3. You are against same-sex civil unions
4. I - believe - you are against gun control
5. You are against embryo stem-cell research
Yet this is your choice for 2008? How do you justify the hypocrisy?
Actually, to be fair to Mindia, he has actually said he's in favor of gay civil unions, as I recall, or at least not rabidly opposed to them. What he's adamantly opposed to is calling such a union Marriage.
I don't hate Catholics.
I am pro life.
I'm pro same-sex unions.
I'm all for gun rights.
I'm against embryonic stem cell research.
and I like Rudi Giuliani.
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Xaiveir wrote:I am by far in favor of Republican, however i would not be apposed to Guiliani winning the election.
I don't understand why people vote based on party, instead of individuals who are running
Guiliani will likely run under a Republican ticket, however in quite a few areas his stances are not that of the Republican platform... so in essence people would be voting for the cantidate and not the party.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
I dont vote based on their party affiliation at all. I look at the issues, and their stances. I could care less if they are republican, democrat or indipendant. Recently i have not seen a Republican that i agreed with their agenda, Guillini i think would change that.
my guess is that he means he would rather have a more traditional republican, but despite rudy's untraditional stances he would still be a good candidate.
