Hussein to be executed before January 27

Post by **Martrae** » Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:09 pm

Boy...they didn't pussyfoot around did they?

Gaazy · Post by **Gaazy** » Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:38 pm

I would have liked to see it in person

Xaiveir · Post by **Xaiveir** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:33 am

Narrock wrote:Let's have a moment of silence to remember this great man...

.....................................................................................................................................K! :asshole:

Minrott · Post by **Minrott** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 5:15 am

I could almost feel myself getting safer as the life drained from his body. I'm safe safe safe now! Thank you war!

KaiineTN · Post by **KaiineTN** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 6:33 am

I bet Daddy Bush bought lil' Dubya a big ice cream sundae for such a fine achievement.

Jay · Post by **Jay** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:17 pm

Hangin with Mr. Hussein

Post by **Lueyen** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:27 am

Not for the squeamish

http://one.revver.com/watch/130549

This video has yet to be authenticated. Unlike most of the confirmed videos in the MSM, this one does not cut away when the trap door is released, if it is a fake... it was very elaborate.

Gypsiyee · Post by **Gypsiyee** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:53 pm

I'm not too squeamish and I kind of want to watch it but it isn't like I see hangings very often so I don't know if it's going to make me squeamish, how bad is it ><

Spazz · Post by **Spazz** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 1:01 pm

Its really crappy video. I dont think its really that grapic at all.

Post by **Lueyen** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:01 pm

Gypsiyee wrote:I'm not too squeamish and I kind of want to watch it but it isn't like I see hangings very often so I don't know if it's going to make me squeamish, how bad is it ><

There isn't anything really graphic, if it bothers you it won't so much be because of what you see, but because of the idea behind it. Honestly most people will be de-sensitized to it mostly because at some point they've been exposed to something much worse. The warning I put might be a bit exaggerated... but that's better then someone clicking the link with a young child in the room or something of that nature.

Jennay · Post by **Jennay** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:04 pm

It's not that bad...they show guards leading him to the contraption, putting the noose around his neck and there's some talking/shouting going on. He says his last words and then out of no where you see him drop but they don't show his body swinging. Then the camera goes up to the trap door looking downward at him and it's a close up of his face and you can see he's obviously dead. It's a really crappy video shot with someone's cell phone probably.

Post by **Lueyen** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:22 pm

Yes Jennay supposedly it was a cell phone video leak.

Narrock · Post by **Narrock** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:28 pm

I can't stand Apple Quicktime, so for those of you who also don't want that Apple crap on your computer you can see the google video of it here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... ging&hl=en

Post by **Tossica** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:05 am

I got no satisfaction in seeing him dead.

Post by **Lueyen** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:54 am

Me either really, however after inital reports not being confirmed and considering his history for popping back up I did want to see it myself to confirm it.

kinghooter00 · Post by **kinghooter00** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:38 pm

gayyyyy i wanted to see him hanging...
darn... coming soon...

Tikker · Post by **Tikker** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 4:16 pm

Maybe they can do Bush next

at least there's proof that Bush has WMD, and has used them on others

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 4:47 pm

Tikker wrote:Maybe they can do Bush next

at least there's proof that Bush has WMD, and has used them on others

has used WMD?

What in the fuck retarded shit do they tell you "people" up there?

Zanchief · Post by **Zanchief** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 4:57 pm

I'm not sure you know what WMD are, but I think those things that rained down on the Iraqis in the days after the "invasion" probably fit the bill.

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 5:02 pm

No, they do fucking not.

Weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a term used to describe a munition with the capacity to indiscriminately kill large numbers of living beings. The phrase broadly encompasses several areas of weapon synthesis, including nuclear, biological, chemical (NBC) and, increasingly, radiological weapons.

I am fairly sure (99% mind you) we used none of those in Iraq "the days after the invasion".

Again, I ask, what in the fuck does the Downs' Syndrome birdie look like that told you this shit?

Zanchief · Post by **Zanchief** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 5:26 pm

Random shit Finny Googled wrote:Weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a term used to describe a munition with the capacity to indiscriminately kill large numbers of living beings.

Sounds good to me. Let's all argue how subjective the term WMD is all day. That should fill up your lonely day.

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 5:36 pm

You are wrong. There is no argument.

Spazz · Post by **Spazz** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 6:45 pm

Your a fuckin idiot harrison. Say it with me WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. If you have a hard time with it the part you might need to repeat a few times is MASS DESTRUCTION.Sorry homie but huge bombs and cluster bombs do fit that description. Oh and how bout that depleted uranium??

Post by **Lueyen** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:01 pm

Harrison... don't argue it just go with it. Now by these new definitions of WMD lets take a look again at the question did Iraq under Sadam post Desert Storm have or attempt to obtain WMD.

Spazz, Zanhcief wanna continue this circle jerk?

Harrison · Post by **Harrison** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:26 pm

Of course they don't want to continue, they are so humiliatingly wrong.

The sheer fact they believe ordinary weapons such as fucking HIGH EXPLOSIVE BOMBS are Weapons of Mass Destruction speaks volumes of that vast well of ignorance held behind their skulls.

If you were to take into consideration the ignorance involved in your "argument", Zan and Spazz. We clearly had 100% valid reasons to go into Iraq under the pretense that Saddam Hussein had and/or was trying to obtain what is clearly defined in your "understanding" ( :rofl:

) as "Weapons of Mass Destruction".

You guys are so fucking stupid. (Zan sometimes, Spazz is never anything but)