Matrix is near?
Moderator: Dictators in Training
Matrix is near?
Scientist at the University of Texas have developed a nanobot-size fuel cell that produces electricity directly from the glucose-oxygen reaction in human blood. Called a "vampire-bot" by commentators, the cell produces electricity sufficient to power conventional electronics and could be used for future blood-borne nanobots. Japanese scientist pursuing a similar project estimated that their system had the theoretical potential to produce a peak of one hundred watts from the blood of one person, although implantable devices would use far less.
גם זה יעבור
Narrock wrote:Yup, I ... was just trolling.
Narrock wrote:I wikipedia'd everything first.
- kaharthemad
- NT Traveller

- Posts: 3768
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 8:47 am
- Location: Somewhere South of Disorder
- kaharthemad
- NT Traveller

- Posts: 3768
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 8:47 am
- Location: Somewhere South of Disorder
Yeah, but the potential benefits are huge too. Think about it: actual powered prosthetic limbs, so that people who've had amputations can really function again almost completely normally. Pacemakers that never need to be removed and replaced cause of the battery running out.
Not to mention, Ralf would have loved it, as it would be one step further on his path of becoming a Combat Cyborg...
-Arlos
Not to mention, Ralf would have loved it, as it would be one step further on his path of becoming a Combat Cyborg...
-Arlos
10sun wrote:Yamori wrote:What are the malevolent alternative uses?
Well it certainly would be a good replacement for RFID chips for starters.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
ClakarEQ wrote:As RFID in people?
Pretty much, there would be some issues to overcome. Antenna would be the first thing to come to mind, size would be the second.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
10sun wrote:Lueyen wrote:ClakarEQ wrote:As RFID in people?
Pretty much, there would be some issues to overcome. Antenna would be the first thing to come to mind, size would be the second.
Well you wouldn't do it with just one nanobot, but several thousand of them working together would work.
Include it in standard immunizations, and now big brother can track everyone!!!

Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
Yeah but doesn't that seem a bit overboard.
For feasability though, your body is an antenna so I doubt you'd even need one at all. Just enough bots to make a circuit with some logic.
Wouldn't that be an awesome system to hack after it is implemented? I mean you could probably find a way to mind control or push a button to buckle people over in pain, the power would be undeniable.
For feasability though, your body is an antenna so I doubt you'd even need one at all. Just enough bots to make a circuit with some logic.
Wouldn't that be an awesome system to hack after it is implemented? I mean you could probably find a way to mind control or push a button to buckle people over in pain, the power would be undeniable.
- 10sun
- NT Drunkard

- Posts: 9861
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 10:22 am
- Location: Westwood, California
- Contact:
Lueyen wrote:10sun wrote:Lueyen wrote:ClakarEQ wrote:As RFID in people?
Pretty much, there would be some issues to overcome. Antenna would be the first thing to come to mind, size would be the second.
Well you wouldn't do it with just one nanobot, but several thousand of them working together would work.
Include it in standard immunizations, and now big brother can track everyone!!!
The difficulty would be the fact that nanobots would degrade within a matter of days at best.



