Vick Indicted
Moderators: Mop, Dictators in Training
Actually, Tank was convicted. Goodell had to wait til he got out of jail to decide on his suspension. But both he and Pacman were hammered cause they'd been suspended by the league multiple times before, so they were "repeat offenders". Vick hasn't been suspended before for off-the-field behavior issues.
Now, if Vick gets convicted, he's fucked. I'll be surprised if he's ever let back in the league at all.
-Arlos
Now, if Vick gets convicted, he's fucked. I'll be surprised if he's ever let back in the league at all.
-Arlos
Tank had already served jailtime -- Pacman was suspended because he's been arrested about 50 times.
The new conduct policy supposedly deals out immediate suspensions for repeat offenders, and this is Vick's first. Although you could make the argument this is much worse than getting stopped for DUI a few times, since it went on for years, he just didn't get caught.
The new conduct policy supposedly deals out immediate suspensions for repeat offenders, and this is Vick's first. Although you could make the argument this is much worse than getting stopped for DUI a few times, since it went on for years, he just didn't get caught.
Well, from what CNN-SI is saying, even though the court handling the case is one of the fastest in the Federal system, the trial is not likely to start until 6+ months from now, which would be after the NFL season. You can't suspend someone based on allegations, no matter how bad, which means that Vick is almost certainly going to get to play out this season, unless he plea-bargains the charges, in which case who knows.
But if this goes to trial, it'll almost certainly start Jan/Feb time frame, so he'll play out the 07-08 season. NEXT year though, all bets are off.
-Arlos
But if this goes to trial, it'll almost certainly start Jan/Feb time frame, so he'll play out the 07-08 season. NEXT year though, all bets are off.
-Arlos
Due to the wonderful agreement the moron players union put in place, Goodel can suspend someone for just about anything. He has the end appeal rights for all decisions, remember?
The bigger question is what will Arthur Blank do. He's a shrewd businessman and doesn't want his brands, the Falcons or Home Depot tarnished. It'll be interesting to see how he handles this.. Whether he cuts his ties, or sticks with Vick
The bigger question is what will Arthur Blank do. He's a shrewd businessman and doesn't want his brands, the Falcons or Home Depot tarnished. It'll be interesting to see how he handles this.. Whether he cuts his ties, or sticks with Vick
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
– C. S. Lewis
– C. S. Lewis
lyion wrote:The bigger question is what will Arthur Blank do. He's a shrewd businessman and doesn't want his brands, the Falcons or Home Depot tarnished. It'll be interesting to see how he handles this.. Whether he cuts his ties, or sticks with Vick
I doubt Vick will get cut simply because of the salary cap implications. He signed a 10 year, $98 million contract in 2004. The falcons would take a $8 million cap hit in 2007 and $15 mil in 2008 if they cut him.
It's just a couple of dogs fighting. No before you go flaming me, I'm a pet owner (shelty named Lola) but there is a difference between someones pet and a random animal. It's not like he took some little girls pig and threw it on a bar-b-que. How many animals are killed everyday in this country by shelters???
Is it cruel? Absolutely and Vick should have to serve community time taking care of sick and injured animals, not lose his career over it.
Is it cruel? Absolutely and Vick should have to serve community time taking care of sick and injured animals, not lose his career over it.








