USC = LOSERS

Where everyone discusses football, and two dorks try to pretend people actually like the NBA and spam what should be in PMs.

Moderators: Mop, Dictators in Training

User avatar
leah
Preggers!
Preggers!
Posts: 6815
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: nebraska
Contact:

USC = LOSERS

Post by leah »

that is all. :D

when my home team is losing (FUCK nebraska's defense SUCKS!!), it's nice to take comfort in the fact that an unranked team can take down JOHN DAVID BOOTY & co. gosh i hate that guy's name.
lolz
User avatar
Diekan
NT Deity
NT Deity
Posts: 5736
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am

Re: USC = LOSERS

Post by Diekan »

Yes, yes!!!!

ROFL @ USC!!!

Notre Dame didn't lose, but they suck so bad this year it doesn't really matter now....

Our D sucks because Callahan is moron who should have been FIRED 3 years ago. The D doesn't tackle. They just throw their bodies at the receivers/backs and hope that knocks them down.

Why they wont fire that piss poor excuse for a coach is beyond me. I think in the past 5 years he's averaged roughly 6 wins per season... any other school would have fired his ass after year TWO.
User avatar
leah
Preggers!
Preggers!
Posts: 6815
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: nebraska
Contact:

Re: USC = LOSERS

Post by leah »

i am so disgusted with the outcome of tonight's game that i don't even know what to say.

tbqh, i was actually a little surprised at mizzou that they didn't pull their starters earlier, b/c for christ's sake, it's not like we were going to win.

i appreciate what callahan's been trying to do with our offense and everything, and i really think that keller's been doing a decent job, but GODDAMN we just suck and it's time to recognize that. maybe being knocked out of the top 25 will light a fire under our asses.

at least, i really hope so, because i have tix to next week's game vs. OSU, and i don't really want to watch us take it up the ass :\
lolz
brinstar
Cat Crew
Cat Crew
Posts: 13142
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:45 pm
Location: 402

Re: USC = LOSERS

Post by brinstar »

we're not a football school anymore

we're a volleyball school
compost the rich
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Re: USC = LOSERS

Post by Harrison »

brinstar wrote:we're not a football school anymore

we're a volleyball school


This promotes boobs. Promoting boobs is good.
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
Reynaldo
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
Posts: 1035
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 10:15 am

Re: USC = LOSERS

Post by Reynaldo »

Big 12 blows this year. OU is the only decent team.

LSU vs. South Florida for the national championship np.
Kramer
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 10:50 pm
Location: tha doity sowf

Re: USC = LOSERS

Post by Kramer »

The NCAA Football season so far has been a giant clusterfuck concerning the Ranking system (A.P. Top 25, etc) I mean it is seriously jacked, it doesn't seem like the top 15 have been so open to getting their asses handed to them by unranked teams...


oh and .... Volleyball is a very happy thing to promote...

Image
Mindia is seriously the greatest troll that has ever lived.
    User avatar
    Ouchyfish
    NT Patron
    NT Patron
    Posts: 4744
    Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:57 am

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Ouchyfish »

    Alabama squeaked by Houston and Auburn destroyed Vanderbilt by 4 touchdowns (unlike Bama beating them by 2.)

    Florida almost beat the number one team and you know who just beat Florida...

    Auburn 38, Alabama 10<---2007 Iron Bowl Prediction
    Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.


    Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
    brinstar
    Cat Crew
    Cat Crew
    Posts: 13142
    Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:45 pm
    Location: 402

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by brinstar »

    we'll let you know when the iron bowl matters
    compost the rich
    User avatar
    Ouchyfish
    NT Patron
    NT Patron
    Posts: 4744
    Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:57 am

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Ouchyfish »

    brinstar wrote:we'll let you know when the iron bowl matters


    I'll let you know when nebraska matters...well...your grandkids maybe.

    brinstar wrote:we're not a football school anymore

    we're a volleyball school


    You said it best.
    Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.


    Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
    User avatar
    Diekan
    NT Deity
    NT Deity
    Posts: 5736
    Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Diekan »

    That will change when Callahan is gone, which can't happen soon enough.
    brinstar
    Cat Crew
    Cat Crew
    Posts: 13142
    Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:45 pm
    Location: 402

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by brinstar »

    Ouchyfish wrote:
    brinstar wrote:we'll let you know when the iron bowl matters


    I'll let you know when nebraska matters...well...your grandkids maybe.



    swing and a miss. you must've missed the part about me not giving two shits about nebraska football :)

    anyway, enjoy your iron bowl, the rest of the country has better things to do

    like laundry

    or crossword puzzles
    compost the rich
    User avatar
    Ouchyfish
    NT Patron
    NT Patron
    Posts: 4744
    Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:57 am

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Ouchyfish »

    Swing and a miss for you as well then. The ratings say otherwise.

    And for someone who doesn't give two shits you sure whine like a bitch about them enough to potentially prove otherwise.
    Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.


    Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
    User avatar
    Tacks
    NT Legend
    NT Legend
    Posts: 16393
    Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:18 pm
    Location: PA

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Tacks »

    rofl, what?

    What's the iron bowl
    brinstar
    Cat Crew
    Cat Crew
    Posts: 13142
    Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:45 pm
    Location: 402

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by brinstar »

    Ouchyfish wrote:Swing and a miss for you as well then. The ratings say otherwise.

    And for someone who doesn't give two shits you sure whine like a bitch about them enough to potentially prove otherwise.



    haha what the fuck, i don't whine about the huskers, i try to stifle laughter about them

    and tacks, the iron bowl is some lameass backwoods hick game that no one outside of alabama cares about
    compost the rich
    User avatar
    Tacks
    NT Legend
    NT Legend
    Posts: 16393
    Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:18 pm
    Location: PA

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Tacks »

    I know what it is, I was just playing along.
    brinstar
    Cat Crew
    Cat Crew
    Posts: 13142
    Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:45 pm
    Location: 402

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by brinstar »

    i know you know what it is

    i was just spiking your set

    because we are a volleyball school :)
    compost the rich
    User avatar
    Lyion
    Admin Abuse Squad
    Admin Abuse Squad
    Posts: 14376
    Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
    Location: Ohio

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Lyion »

    Man, Florida ALMOST beat LSU. That would've given OSU a good shot at #1 and the yokels here would've rejoiced.

    College football SO needs a playoff system.

    F the BCS.
    What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
    C. S. Lewis
    User avatar
    Ouchyfish
    NT Patron
    NT Patron
    Posts: 4744
    Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:57 am

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Ouchyfish »

    lyion wrote:Man, Florida ALMOST beat LSU. That would've given OSU a good shot at #1 and the yokels here would've rejoiced.

    College football SO needs a playoff system.

    F the BCS.


    Amen..and think of all the crazy retarded money they could make off of more games! (Since that's the only way to get their attention with new ideas.)
    Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.


    Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
    User avatar
    Arlos
    Admin Abuse Squad
    Admin Abuse Squad
    Posts: 9021
    Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:39 pm
    Contact:

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Arlos »

    They don't do it, because that'd kinda render the overall bowl system kinda useless, and they want to rake in all those advertising dollars from the "Corporation X Bowl!" x100.

    Of course, they claim it's "FOR THE CHILDREN", er, "FOR THE ATHLETES!" cause they claim a playoff system would be an onerous burden to the "student"-athletes. Of course, all lower divisions of NCAA football have a playoff system, and it doesn't seem to be too much of a burden on THOSE players, so that explanation kinda pegs the BS-O-Meter.

    -Arlos
    User avatar
    Ouchyfish
    NT Patron
    NT Patron
    Posts: 4744
    Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:57 am

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Ouchyfish »

    Couldn't the corporation bowls host the major playoff matchups towards the end?
    Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.


    Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
    User avatar
    Arlos
    Admin Abuse Squad
    Admin Abuse Squad
    Posts: 9021
    Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:39 pm
    Contact:

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Arlos »

    Yeah, but playoffs would be based on the top 8 teams, as there's no way in bloody hell you could do something like March Madness for football.

    So, you go from what, 50+ bowls to 8? I am sure they could still hold other "bowl" games, but with the diversion of interest onto the playoff bowls, I doubt the NCAA could squeeze anywhere near as much money from the corporations for them.

    -Arlos
    Tikker
    NT Legend
    NT Legend
    Posts: 14294
    Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Tikker »

    Arlos wrote:Yeah, but playoffs would be based on the top 8 teams, as there's no way in bloody hell you could do something like March Madness for football.


    why not?


    go back to last years national game

    how long between their last game and that game? it was something retarded like 50+ days wasn't it?
    User avatar
    Ouchyfish
    NT Patron
    NT Patron
    Posts: 4744
    Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:57 am

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Ouchyfish »

    Tikker wrote:
    Arlos wrote:Yeah, but playoffs would be based on the top 8 teams, as there's no way in bloody hell you could do something like March Madness for football.


    why not?


    go back to last years national game

    how long between their last game and that game? it was something retarded like 50+ days wasn't it?


    Exactly. Just use the lesser bowls to handle the lesser matchups in the playoff. Also, why just the top 8? Let's do Top 24! Set up seeds and lowest seeded can start with 3 Bowls on Saturday, maybe two or three during the week at night. I just eliminated 6 teams making it possible to have the whole shindig over with in 3-4 weeks, which is about what the damn post season amounts to now anyways. Some kinks need to be worked out about who platys who first, later, etc, but it could be done. Or fuck it, copy what AA does.

    The lesser bowls go first, the bigger ones go later, alternating National Champ game like they do now.
    Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.


    Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
    User avatar
    Tacks
    NT Legend
    NT Legend
    Posts: 16393
    Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:18 pm
    Location: PA

    Re: USC = LOSERS

    Post by Tacks »

    Go ahead and convince the sponsers that their bowl should be the "lesser bowl".
    Post Reply