by Gypsiyee » Mon Apr 21, 2008 10:14 am
The other question I would ask is what type of mother this girl is to the child if she can't even keep it in her pants. Judges almost always lean towards the side of the mother unless she's unfit. Does she love the child? Would she make a good single mother? Does she want to be a single mother or is she trying to come up with an excuse to get out of motherhood by causing conflict?
It's easy for an outsider, especially one who's never had a child, to say walk away from it - for people who form a bond like that with a child, it's generally not an option to them to just x the child out of their life.
No matter how you slice it, I think he needs to be out of the relationship with the mother - she's clearly not someone he, or anyone for that matter, needs to be with. However, after that part is done, it needs to be determined where the child needs to go. The biological father obviously isn't an option, though he will need to be involved in the case so he can go ahead and forget about the whole 'protect my marriage' bs.
If the mother is a good mother and is keen on being a single mother, well it might be in the child's best interest for her to raise the child on her own before anymore damage is done and let your friend grieve in his own time. First and foremost is obviously going to be the best interest of the child. If she's not a good mother, it'll depend on how the case goes but I think your friend would have a good defense in gaining custody if he would like it.
If it's his desire to stay in the child's life, it needs to go to court - bottom line. If he feels it's better for the baby to not have him in his life, then he needs to step out of it now while the child's at an age that it won't remember down the road the mess that this woman has made.
"I think you may be confusing government running amok with government doing stuff you don't like. See, you're in the
minority now. It's
supposed to taste like a shit taco." - Jon Stewart